TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
22.12.2008
Obama and the Drug War

Is it possible that nowadays more people are beheaded in Mexico than in Iraq? I'm not aware that candidate Obama--perhaps not wanting to start a conversation about his biography--ever addressed the folly of the drug war in detail. In 2004 he did call the enterprise an "utter failure" and said it was time to "rethink" marijuana laws (short of legalization), but you didn't hear much of that during the campaign. It'll be interesting to see whether his administration changes American policy in any substantial way.

Update: Foreign Policy called the drug war one of the big unaddressed issues of the campaign:

Both McCain and Obama have praised Calderón’s crackdown. McCain visited Mexico in July and described the fighting as “a common struggle with a common enemy.” Obama has pledged to increase U.S. aid and focus on issues such as corruption. But if either candidate is open to rethinking the four-decade war on drugs that has done almost nothing to reduce U.S. demand or foreign supply, he hasn’t mentioned it during this campaign. 

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:11 AM with 10 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

GSpinks said:

God I freakin hope so! This country's efforts to criminalize recreational drugs out of existence is not only not working, its is creating new economic and social burdens associated with criminal justice and the penal system. This criminalization nonsense needs to stop.

Government needs to focus more on preventive education, which has been proven effective repeatedly over the last 30 or so years; this will actually help across the board because reducing the consumer base of recreational drugs will have more of an impact on the drug trade than any sting operation ever run. Reduced demand can destroy any industry, the drug trade is no different.

December 22, 2008 11:38 AM

nbarry said:

Repeat after me: a vice is not a crime. Spending billions to keep people from going to hell in their own handbasket through police action is a luxury the taxpayers can't afford.

December 22, 2008 1:23 PM

boneill said:

I don't think Obama is going to tackle this anytime soon, regardless of his personal feelings.   It will be (absurdly) controversial, and with everything going on I don't think he can afford to spend his political capital on it.  It sucks, because the drug war is such a hugely important issue, but I see this as more of a second-term thing.

December 22, 2008 1:51 PM

mcorey.geo said:

Boneill is right that this is NOT going to happen, but only partially right about the reasons. This is one of the VERY FEW cases in which Obama's race (sorry for pun!) colors his decisions. To wit: he has decided that his preferred role as a black family man and orator is to be a moral scold. To admit that recreational drug users are not monsters will interfere with the unanimity of this message.

December 22, 2008 3:46 PM

blackton said:

Since Calderon's crackdown, everything has gone to hell. It was a lot better before. When Calderon cracked down, he took down the management but this has only led to the leaderless staff to engage in open warfare. Even in my remote area of Mexico one drug kingpin hid out and a group of people died in the ensuing aftermath.

December 22, 2008 5:01 PM

jwl2672 said:

I love how liberals have twisted themselves into a pretzel justifying legalizing drugs while banning guns.  How are they any different? They both harm and kill and are subject to the prudence of the user.  The same arguments liberals use to justify drugs (don't harm anyone when used by a responsible user, reduces crime) can be used to justify guns.

December 23, 2008 12:43 PM

fclowney said:

It's hard not to think that part of the problem is the vast and permanent army gainfully employed in the War on Drugs.  They will do everything possible to keep the war going, even though they know better than anyone what a failure it is.  It's a job - a secure, well-paying job, and those are hard to come by these days. Sad..  

December 23, 2008 12:50 PM

GSpinks said:

Thats a very cute straw man, JWL, especially with the theoretically they're no different trope. But the universe of different between an ounce of home grown marijuana and a high calibre machine gun with belt feed mock your lack of perspective.

December 23, 2008 2:03 PM

jwl2672 said:

Gspinks

And yet surprisingly, not too many stories of criminals with belt-fed machine guns running wild in the streets are in the news too often.  On the other hand, had there been MORE people with legal heavy MG's in Bombay, they may have had a chance against those scum terrorists and their AK's.

December 23, 2008 4:50 PM

GSpinks said:

JWL

Even the sporadic revolver would have done worlds of good; the advantages of range and rate of fire for an AK are effectively negated inside buildings.

The problem I have with your post is that you accuse liberals of not being able to recognize the equivalency of guns and drugs, with the connotation that liberals want to legalize all recreational drugs and ban all forms of firearms, and yet I've never even heard of such a person (I'm sure they're out there, somewhere). The point of the weed to machine gun comparison was partly to highlight the absurdity of the connotation and partly to highlight that pretty much all recreational drugs are outlawed in America (an ounce of weed is a felony in most states, iirc), whereas firearms, even power fully automatic weapons are available and legal (some weaponsmithing maybe required, of course) (www.killsometime.com/.../Video.asp)

December 23, 2008 6:09 PM