TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 4:05 PM
July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
26.11.2008
Who Has Obama's Ear On India?

Obama's presidential foreign policy team is, of course, not yet filled out. And his spokespeople don't like to single out specific advisors. But based on the word of regional experts and published reports, it's possible to identify a few key figures who closely advised the campaign and are quite likely offering their input right now.

One is Jonah Blank, a former foreign correspondent (and author of a historically-based travelogue through India) who also served as the top South Asia specialist on the Senate Foreign Relations under Joe Biden.

Bruce Reidel of the Brookings Institution spent a long career at the CIA and State Department and National Security Council. Reidel advocates a new push to resolve the India-Pakistan dispute over Kashmir as a way of defusing tensions in the region.

And there's Karl Inderfurth, currently a professor at George Washington U's Elliott School of International Affairs, another veteran of the foreign policy bureaucracy who was assistant secretary of state for South Asian affairs in Bill Clinton's second term. His name is often mentioned in Indian media as a possible US Ambassador to New Delhi.

Biden, by the way, is a pretty good advisor on the region himself: Among other things he was the Senate steward of the controversial US-India nuclear cooperation bill earlier this year, which meant quite a lot to New Delhi. And with his usual hyperbole, he also told an online Indian outlet two years ago: "My dream is that in 2020 the two closest nations in the world will be India and the United States."

That said, it's Obama's top campaign foreign policy advisors, including Denis McDonough and Mark Lippert, who have been working overtime today and briefing the president-elect.

Even if the Mumbai attacks wind up being a tragic but passing event with no lasting consequences, these people are likely to play an important role as Obama reframes US policy in the region as part of a new focus on saving Afghanistan. All seem to support the pronounced move in recent years toward closer US ties with India, in part as a regional counterweight to China, as illustrated by the nuclear cooperation agreement, which many non-proliferation hardliners hated.

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 11:30 PM with 1 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

CAM2 said:

"All seem to support the pronounced move in recent years toward closer US ties with India, in part as a regional counterweight to China, as illustrated by the nuclear cooperation agreement, which many non-proliferation hardliners hated."

What does this mean?  What does it mean for the US to support India as a 'regional counter-weight to China'?  What does the nuclear deal do  to 1) lessen tensions in the region; 2) eliminate nuclear prolifiration; 3) move towards some solution to Kashmir and other Indian/Pakistani issues.

It's exactly that kind of chess-game politics that Obama was elected to overcome.  Many of us voted for Obama because he promised a new kind of politics on the international level where negotiation, diplomacy and SOLVING PROBLEMS takes precedent over 'realist' power plays and neocon dreams.

So you support the nuclear deal?  Please explain.  What will it get us?

(horribledictu.com)

November 28, 2008 12:05 AM