TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
19.11.2008
Is Rahm Proposing A Health Care Horse Trade?

Another quick thought on that WSJ article about Rahm's comments to business leaders yesterday. These portions of the Journal piece stood out for me:

He was asked his views on the push by labor unions to allow workplaces to be organized with the signing of cards attesting to union support rather than a secret ballot. Mr. Emanuel declined to say whether the White House would support the legislation, but he said the unions are addressing the concerns of a middle class that has seen U.S. median income slide over the past eight years, while health care, energy and education costs have soared.

He said business leaders should help find solutions to the middle-class squeeze or face a revolt. "We need a strategy as a country to make sure they have an opportunity to move up that ladder," he said. ...

He stressed that the new administration would "throw long and deep," taking advantage of the economic crisis to push wholesale changes in health care, taxes, financial re-regulation and energy. "The American people in two successive elections have voted for change, and change cannot be allowed to die on the doorsteps of Washington," Mr. Emanuel said.

Is it possible that Rahm's essentially saying to corporate America: Look, we have to help middle-class workers. We have a number of ways we'd like to do that--health care reform, tax cuts, green-energy investments, other infrastructure projects, education, on down to card check. But we also understand that card check is absolutely anathema to you. So work with us on our other priorities and maybe we can make card check go away for a while.

Am I over-reading here?

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:23 PM with 9 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

primwallflow said:

No, I think that's EXACTLY what they wanted to convey... and if indeed it was, they've certainly got their priorities straight.

Two things I wonder, though: 1) Is card-check such an anathema to corporate America that its irrelevance is worth cooperation on universal health care, to say nothing of the other policies Rahm mentioned? 2) Does corporate America really trust the Obama Administration to restrain a Democratic Congress from going rogue and acting on card check, especially as 2010 and 2012 approach? It's not like unions would be placated by universal health care... most if not all of their members already have health care, thanks, in no small part, to the unions themselves. Unions went all-in on Obama and spent a ton of money on his behalf, especially in Ohio and Indiana.

November 19, 2008 1:21 PM

benjamin81 said:

I have heard (was it in TNR? I can't remember) that better than card check would be keeping the secret ballot union vote, but mandating that the vote take place within two weeks, thus reducing the amount of time that corporations can use intimidation tactics. I don't know the law well, but it seems that this is the kind of thing that can be changed by an executive branch ruling. If so, perhaps Emanuel is offering a trade to corporations, and offering a consolation prize to unions. Hope that works.

November 19, 2008 1:37 PM

boxofrox said:

If I were running the offense on universal health care I would fashion the bridge loan /bail out of the Big 3 in such a way as to introduce cost saving efficiencies as a primary component of reorganization. Yes, hammer out all sorts of proviso and if then but nonetheless get that foot in the door. Leveraged thus proceed to strangle concessions from all those with their hands out for govt. rescue in a similar manner and then kick the door wide open.

I'm not saying I advocate such an arrangement. I'm saying that's what I'd attempt to do if my boss said make it so.

November 19, 2008 1:55 PM

The Ignorant Populist said:

What policies did Bush trade in his first term with a tenth of the mandate that Obama has? I can't think of one.

Stand firm Unity of Hope.

November 19, 2008 2:06 PM

boxofrox said:

primwallflow: Good thoughts. But given the choice between chapter 11 or 7 and the narrowing choices that presents to current benefit holders seems to me to offer a very real leverage. Is there any horse trading with an eye to the future? I think so.

November 19, 2008 2:06 PM

boxofrox said:

Ig: Yeah. Claim that righteousness. I guess you're kind of sad about the powers that be leaving Lieberman in his chairmanship, neh?

November 19, 2008 2:20 PM

ackyri said:

That sounds pretty good, Benjamin.

Am I the only one who feels massive internal conflict between my strong support of unions (at least as an ideal) and my aversion to what is, let's face it, a strongly anti-democratic proposal they're making in card check?

November 19, 2008 3:35 PM

The Ignorant Populist said:

Couldn't care less about Lieberman Boxo. Let him have it, take it off him. Means nothing to no one in the real world.

November 19, 2008 5:26 PM

jobeek2 said:

Good God, I hope not Noam. Now you have me worried.

Obama is arguably more progressive than Clinton ever was, making him the most progressive president in 28 or maybe 40 years. He got elected with the biggest share of the vote any Democrat got in 44 years. And he's got a Democratic majority in both the Senate and the House. If even he is supposed to give up something as simple as a return to card check, then you're really screwed.

For the last eight, and to some extent twentyeight years, big business and conservative politicians have worked together to disembowel union rights. Now you've finally got a centre-left President who has a big enough mandate to do something about stuff like this, and the first thing you do, even before the guy's taken office, is start talking about which long-overdue correction you're willing to give up first?

A little more audacity please. Both card check and health care reform are simple basics that you just need to get down to business with.

November 19, 2008 9:32 PM