TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
29.10.2008
Now John Judis Is Scaring *Me*

Judis makes a great point in his otherwise overly-optimistic post on the polls:

I mention the Bradley effect because I think, too, that McCain and Sarah Palin's attack against Obama for advocating "spreading the wealth" and for "socialism" and for pronouncing the civil rights revolution a "tragedy" because it didn't deal with the distribution of wealth is aimed ultimately at white working class undecided voters who would construe "spreading the wealth" as giving their money to blacks. It's the latest version of Reagan's "welfare queen" argument from 1980. It if it works, it won't be because most white Americans actually oppose a progressive income tax, but because they fear that Obama will inordinately favor blacks over them.

Agreed.

Worse, though I have no evidence for this (nothing new there), I worry that these insinuations are reinforced in the minds of working-class whites by the millions of African-Americans lining up early to vote for Obama. How sad for the country if McCain ends up jujitsuing something (i.e., record turnout) that should be a source of pride.

More agita this afternoon...

P.S. I think this stuff really underscores the wisdom of buying that half-hour block of television tonight. It's just hard to think "scary socialist" or, for that matter, scary anything when Obama addresses you directly.

Update: Ed Kilgore is also worried about a possible early-voting backlash. And he's actually got some evidence that it's happening (albeit highly circumstantial). 

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:41 AM with 10 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

jacobt1 said:

"and for pronouncing the civil rights revolution a "tragedy" because it didn't deal with the distribution of wealth "

Who was pronouncing that, Obama or Palin?

October 29, 2008 12:18 PM

BHLnyc said:

One of the truisms of the last year has been that greater exposure to Obama increases his popularity. It's no surprise that his poll numbers really began to rally just as the debates with McCain took center stage of the campaign. (The financial meltdown didn't hurt either, of course.) That's why I agree with you, Noam, that the half-hour ad buy is going to be a net positive and likely to reverse any erosion he's suffering because of the "socialist" tag. His steady, reassuring performance is definitely evocative of Ronald Reagan's in 1980, and this election is being fought on very similar terrain.

October 29, 2008 12:32 PM

anonevent said:

Well, then, make sure all of you go out and vote.  Because if this is what they are running on now, and somehow, other whites (not me) are susceptible to this kind of illogic, then these people would be won by any argument, such as:  Low black turnout means that blacks are just sitting back waiting for their handouts because whites who are voting for Obama must feel guilty.

If Americans are susceptible like this, then nothing can be done, because these people aren't voting on issues that affect them, they are just stuck in the past.  There just has to be more people voting for Obama than McCain.  Luckily for us, a number of conservatives have chosen to vote for Obama as well.

October 29, 2008 12:51 PM

ironyroad said:

The GOP's confidence in American democracy is clearly being shaken by long lines of people queuing up to vote.

October 29, 2008 1:21 PM

phargle said:

That backlash stuff is distressing.  This election was not turning on race, and both candidates did reasonable jobs of keeping it that way.  I will be a bit upset if my guy wins because whites got freaked out by seeing long lines of black voters.   I'm gonna be number-crunching those exit polls closely.

October 29, 2008 1:23 PM

virginiacentrist said:

I think the problem with this theory is that welfare is almost completely deracialized at this point.

October 29, 2008 1:43 PM

The Plank said:

My colleague John Judis is starting to show some concern about the election. Noam Scheiber blew past

October 29, 2008 2:06 PM

lsernoff said:

Who is opposed to a progressive income tax?  Who is opposed to the Earned Income Credit?  Stop the nonsense!  McCain is entirely within bounds in calling Obama for pretending to cut income taxes for people who don't pay income taxes.  As for FICA, if he wants to cut that tax for low earners (by indirect means of an income tax "credit", and finance it by imposing an additional FICA tax on high earners let him just say so.  And if his rationale is "fairness"  let him say so too.  My guess is the last thing we should expect to hear from Senator Obama on TV tonight is a candid, straightforward discussion of his views on income re-distribution, whether by the courts or the legislature.  "Every man a king" passed with Huey Long more than 70 years ago.

October 29, 2008 3:31 PM

ironyroad said:

I'm also getting sick of these folks who earn lower salaries being able to drive on the interstate.  Access to the highway should be restricted according to income.  Enough with this socialistic redistributive nonsense already!  People who pay a higher rate of tax should be able to drive without having these freeloaders changing lanes all the time!

October 29, 2008 4:19 PM

The Plank said:

Responding to John and Noam 's suggestion that McCain's "spreading the wealth" closing

October 30, 2008 10:43 AM