TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
25.10.2008
Nicolle Wallace, Fall Gal

I wasn't aware of this tidbit from Ben Smith's juicy Palin v. McCain piece:

"These people are going to try and shred her after the campaign to divert blame from themselves," a McCain insider said, referring to McCain's chief strategist, Steve Schmidt, and to Nicolle Wallace, a former Bush aide who has taken a lead role in Palin's campaign. Palin's partisans blame Wallace, in particular, for Palin's avoiding of the media for days and then giving a high-stakes interview to CBS News' Katie Couric, the sometimes painful content of which the campaign allowed to be parceled out over a week.

"A number of Gov. Palin's staff have not had her best interests at heart, and they have not had the campaign's best interests at heart," the McCain insider fumed, noting that Wallace left an executive job at CBS to join the campaign.

It's not hard to imagine why the aide with the closest ties to CBS would take the rap for mismanaging Palin.

For what it's worth, I agree with those who say there was no way not to mismanage Palin. The flaw was in the conception (i.e., the veep pick), not the execution.

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Saturday, October 25, 2008 8:12 PM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

JEFF FREY said:

Wow, some people in the McCain campaign didn't have the campaign's best interests at heart? Since the McCain campaign tells us the other side is against America, that must mean that even some of McCain's closest advisers are are AGAINST AMERICA!! No wonder they are losing, this enormous conspiracy to undermine America has even infiltrated the McCain campaign.

October 25, 2008 8:25 PM

JEFF FREY said:

On a more serious note, I think Noam has it right. Palin was so woefully unready to be a VP candidate that there was no way to hide her shortcomings.

October 25, 2008 8:26 PM

Illuminismo said:

Silk purse from Saks Fifth Avenue that failed to impress only 'cause it was never taken outta the box?

Nah.

Sow's ear (but with some mighty fine diamond earrings from Neiman-Marcus).

October 25, 2008 9:41 PM

Lyn39 said:

True.  It's quite amusing that they pretend that Palin's been mismanaged.  Did they tell her it was best if she never googled "role of the VP"?  Did they encourage her to make an ass out of herself on national television - repeatedly?  When you're well-informed and steady, there are no "gotcha" questions - just tough interviews where you have to tread carefully.

The truth is that we have seen Palin for what she is and no amount of management could have provided her with intelligence or wisdom or insight.  The right wing continues to attempt to sell us piles of horseshit  and convince us that if we think it stinks it's because our olfactory receptors are defective (or - worse - un-American).

October 25, 2008 9:43 PM

psantillana said:

That's how I feel about the Iraq war, and also the Clinton campaign. flaw/conceptionwise. But then both those things, like the Palin thing, were screwed up even further by the brilliant minds that conceived them in the first place.

October 26, 2008 2:21 AM

BHLnyc said:

It's amazing how much the fingerpointing and off-the-record, backstabbing interviews are starting to sound like the final weeks of the Clinton campaign.

Penn = Schmidt.

Wolfson = Wallace.

McCain = Hillary.

Palin (in her rogue performance) = Bill.

It's deja vu all over again!

October 26, 2008 7:20 AM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

I really don't remember the Dole campaign sinking into a McCainish rat hole of finger pointing or recriminations one week before the elections. Same for Mondale, who at this time, had no hope of victory.

Something about the 2008 GOP really makes my skin crawl. It is almost as if this bedraggled collection of supply sides loons, flat earthers, and haters have no moral or ethical compass. I cannot imagine the GOP of my youth - Ike, Rockefeller, Ford, even Reagan - engaging in these kinds of antics Hell, even Nixon, who defined executive corruption, waited until after the votes were in to go postal in 62.

Naw, this GOP, like Charles Foster Kane, deserve this ass kicking and as Big Jim Geddes said, maybe a few more to really learn a lesson.

I am not suggesting that they will go the way of the Whigs - which was on the lips of almost every Repub when speaking about the Democrats in 04 - but they may go at least another election cycle before they start to regroup. And as political cycles go, they will regroup. But not for a while is my guess.

October 26, 2008 10:36 AM

blackton said:

I don't know, Dr. Frankenstein or the wizard of Oz could have done it, by giving her a brain.

BHLnyc, I like to call it the Obama zone, where other campaigns lose their minds.

Let us not forget the sex kitten actually winked, f-ing winked at the camera during her one and only debate. Unbelievable. She flirted during a debate. The woman is trash, a media whore who has no respect for the office she seeks. I gotta imagine her wink will go down in history as one of the most tasteless and crass events of any debate at such a high level.

Anything else, Bush I looking at his watch, Nixon's five o´clock shadow, McCain's angry glare, none of it comes close to our very own sex kitten.

Cookie, I voted for Kean and Whitman in NJ. In my mind Dems were best in the Legislature, and Republicans best managing the state. A kind of mommy and daddy theory of gov't. Now it is mommy vs. crazy, batshit uncle.

October 26, 2008 5:22 PM