TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
14.10.2008
Matt Dowd on McCain's Craven Veep Pick

Dowd, the former Bush pollster, had this to say on a panel of DC notables this afternoon (including Joe Klein, from whom I got this):

"They didn't let John McCain pick the person he wanted to pick as VP," Dowd declared during the Time Warner Summit panel. "When Sarah Palin got picked instead of Joe Lieberman, which I fundamentally believed would have given John McCain the best opportunity in this race... as soon as he picked Palin, that whole ready versus not ready argument was not credible."

Saying that Palin was a "net negative" on the ticket, he went on: "[McCain] knows, in his gut, that he put somebody unqualified on the ballot. He knows that in his gut, and when this race is over that is something he will have to live with... He put somebody unqualified on that ballot and he put the country at risk, he knows that."

What else is there to say but, "agreed"? (At least assuming Dowd means "conservatives" when he says "They didn't let...") 

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:50 PM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

icarusr said:

"They didn't let John McCain pick the person he wanted to pick as VP"

Now there's leadership for you.

What else did "they" force POWPOW to do?

October 14, 2008 7:01 PM

FWright said:

Well, I'm not sure that Joe Lieberman would have been the electoral draw that Dowd seems to think.  But McCain could certainly have picked a reliably conservative VP that would have appeased the base without making a mockery of the idea of readiness to serve as president.

October 14, 2008 7:05 PM

blackton said:

Actually, for Lieberman alone he would have been at least spared the ignominy of being the only VP candidate to be defeated on both parties ticket. 200 years from now (long after the reasons why) he would have been a laughingstock, now he will simply be a minor footnote.

I was a bit afraid of Pawlenty. At least he is not remotely an idiot, but would have been simply drab. I still think anyone of a number of Repub. women Senators would have been better if McCain had to go the woman route.

October 14, 2008 7:39 PM

jhunger said:

I'm pretty sure that McCain knows in his head, too, that he picked somebody unqualified for the presidency to be his potential VP.  Not just his gut.  And that he understood this all along.  

October 14, 2008 7:48 PM

fougasseu said:

Pawlenty was the one to fear. He's very smart, very good on his feet, and has the oddest way of being very mean in a mild-mannered way. He's not part of Washington, he's young, a family man with an attractive and successful wife, and fully vetted. He ran as Republican in a very liberal state, and won.

I can't imagine why he was overlooked, but fortunately for the Democrats, he was.

I believe Palin has been a surprise to everyone, including Palin. Have you watched her onstage when someone else is talking? She looks scared, exhillarated, more than a little off kilter. She's probably going mad. I expect her to go "Little Miss Sunshine" batshit one of these days.

Acting ordinary 24/7 takes a lot of effort.

October 14, 2008 8:22 PM

sullydog said:

This, for me, should be the gist of it for the electorate. In a desperate bid to solidify his base and pander to the XX half of the electorate, McCain put the entire nation at risk by choosing Sarah Palin.

"Country first," indeed.

"Honor," indeed.

Yes, McCain has bragged of being "the biggest deregulator you ever saw." His economic "plans" are disjointed and ad hoc at best. Unlike the thin gruel of the Ayers association, McCain's Keating Five involvement shows that he's been on the wrong side of issues that have tremendous currency. Even now, he continues to repackage the utter failure that is Reagonomics for the electorate. His obstinate subscription to the Bush foreign policy is a huge black eye, and his repeated references to some undefined, mystical "Victory" in Iraq hints at a disturbing Quixotic neurosis. His campaign has been disorganized, flat-footed, tactical (if you'll forgive) rather than strategic, and in some ways more malevant even than the Rove playbook. Last week his campaign had to pull back from incitations to violence.

And the man is fairly starting to dodder.

But forget all that. Palin alone disqualifies McCain, at the most fundamental level, to be Commander in Chief. In a crunch, at a time of crisis, HE PUT HIMSELF AHEAD OF HIS COUNTRY, and showed that he could not be trusted to make decisions for the nation. Not only should he not be President, he should retire from public life altogether, in disgrace.

McCain is a man I once admired. Now I am ashamed of him.

(copied to Talkbackers.)

October 14, 2008 9:42 PM

tj_emerson said:

I can't believe that anyone seriously thought the Republicans - the party of "Bible-believing Christians" - would nominate Lieberman. How delusional.

October 15, 2008 2:41 AM

ratnerstar said:

Pawlenty would have been a good choice in a normal year, but McCain was up against crazy headwinds this year.  He needed to do something dramatic.  I still think Lieberman would have been his best shot, combined with a campaign that focused completely on the centrist middle.  McCain's theme should have been "I'm experienced, I'm non ideological, and I'll work with moderate Democrats to solve problems."

Instead, he went with Palin, who is dramatic in precisely the wrong way.  Oh well, sucks to be him.  That campaign would have been a lie anyway.

October 15, 2008 11:45 AM

jhildner said:

Agreed, except for the gut part.  I think he regular knows it -- not gut knows it.

October 15, 2008 12:19 PM

Lundell said:

And Lieberman wouldn't have made any difference.  McCain would have become "Johnny One-Note" with everything being about foreign policy.  

October 15, 2008 1:42 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

The problem with Palin is that she's obviously malleable and can't be as stupid as she's pretending to be. In other words, the McCain campaign wants her to throw nasty barbs at Obama, be an attack dog, and play up the anti-intellectual themes. I suspect that, with proper coaching, she could have been delivered up as a sensible, moderate (reformist, fought her own party, etc.), plainspoken but polite VP. Instead she got off on the wrong foot with a sarcastic acceptance speech, was withheld from the media, and then appeared obstinate and ignorant in interviews. I was inclined to like her on first impression, until she opened her mouth.

In a way, I'm glad we saw this side of her - otherwise it could've been Bush all over again, running as a reasonable moderate than dropping the mask in office (assuming she ever got hold of the reigns of power). But it was definitely a strategic mistake of the McCain campaign to point her in this direction. I don't think she's a loose cannon, I think she does exactly what they want her to do, and that they felt they could shore up the base with her, while McCain ran for the center. But it made the campaign look schizo and stretched it too thin. She was already red meat for the base by being a solid conservative from a rural state - by overplaying her hand, she alienated the independents McCain will need to win.

October 15, 2008 3:37 PM

weisbardaj said:

McCain's selection of Palin, rather than his preferred Lieberman (of whom I am no fan), was in fact a true reflection of his political (and perhaps existential) plight.

The McCain of 2000 could not have been nominated by the Republican party of 2008.

The McCain of 2008, even once assured of the Republican nomination, had neither the leadership nor the authority to run  as a principled pragmatist willing to work across party lines, as a Lieberman VP pick would have exemplified.

McCain will leave this campaign with little sense of integrity and with his reputation in ashes.

The Republican party will reap the ruinous seeds it has sewn, and is destined for a (richly deserved) period in the wilderness.

One can only pray that Obama and the Democrats will muster the intelligence and courage necessary to pick up the pieces and rebuild a broken country.

--The Wise Bard

October 15, 2008 5:43 PM

MauriceReeves.com said:

A few weeks back, after one of the debates, a pundit on CNN joked that he expected a circular firing squad to form up amongst Republicans when they lost. And it has happened. And is it really a surprise? This...

November 9, 2008 11:32 PM