TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
13.10.2008
Only John McCain...

...could spin Obama's skepticism about nuclear power as disrespect for the troops.

During his speech today, McCain noted that many ships in the US Navy are powered by nuclear engines. And that, to paraphrase, if Senator Obama understood the lives of the brave men and women in the US military, he would see that they use nuclear power safely every day.

Update: Here's the exact passage:

By the way, the next time Senator Obama tells you that nuclear power has got to be made safe and environmental and all that, take him over to see one of our Navy ships with nuclear power plants on it, my friends. And ask the men and women who serve proudly on those nuclear powered ships defending freedom all over the world.

(Incidentally, what a weird retort: the power "plants" on ships and subs are tiny compared to the vast complexes that can power cities. The scale --and also the typical distance from populated areas--means it's just not an apt example when you talk about safety and environmental impact.)

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:56 AM with 3 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

sdemuth said:

I also doubt John McCain wants the military to be held responsible for its nuclear waste disposal policies and track record over the last 6 1/2 decades.  DOD and the military arm of DOE have abysmal records in this regard.

October 13, 2008 1:59 PM

ironyroad said:

That's some dumb shoot-from-the-hip remark by McCain.  If I had a family member serving in the Navy on a nuclear-powered vessel, I'd be very interested in the navy's commitment to safety and environmental dangers.  Indeed, for a number of good reasons, including military readiness, I'd expect the military to be interested in that area too.

October 13, 2008 6:08 PM

stgla said:

I ain't no nucular scientist but wouldn't a sub, which is SUBmerged in the OCEAN have a lower chance of melting down than a land-based nuclear, I mean nucular power plant?

October 13, 2008 8:56 PM