TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
10.10.2008
Romney Angles For 2012?

Mike, I wonder how that Romney counterfactual, gloomy for conservatives, improves Mitt's chances in 2012? Ever since he lost the GOP primary, Romney's practically redefined the word "obsequious" vis-a-vis McCain. But he seems to feel there's an opening now to gently suggest that a Romney '08 campaign wouldn't have been such a Hindenburg. This week he took his first, timid step towards criticizing Team McCain, telling Joe Scarborough that "holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake."

One Massachusetts strategist suggested this comment was actually an evil ploy to lure McCain into letting Palin give more interviews, thereby sealing her reputation as an idiot for a forthcoming Romney-Palin showdown in 2012. Say it ain't so, Mitt! I didn't think you had such trickery in you!

--Eve Fairbanks

For Michael Crowley's original post on a hypothetical Romney candidacy, click here.

Posted: Friday, October 10, 2008 10:29 AM with 4 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

adaglas said:

Why stop there?  If Rudy can come back from the dead we could be looking showdown in '12 that could be dubbed the Wizard of Oz primary:  Palin as the Scarecrow, Rudy as the Tin Man, and Mitt as the Cowardly Lion.

October 10, 2008 11:00 AM

arsonplus said:

Palin falling on her face during the debate was Romney's only real shot at 2012.

October 10, 2008 11:47 AM

ramboorider said:

Are other Republican 2012 hopefuls really concerned that Palin would be a serious candidate in four years? Can someone really advance from being unable to speak plain English on the major issues of the day to a serious contender in four years? I don't think so. It takes many years to become well enough versed to handle the day to day rigors of answering questions, debating, establishing your own set of positions, etc to get through a presidential campaign. I suspect if she ran she'd embarrass herself - not to Couric interview levels, but pretty badly. I don't think she'd be standing by March.

October 10, 2008 1:04 PM

The Stump said:

The economy is collapsing and the GOP is stuck with a candidate who doesn't know jack about economics

October 10, 2008 4:29 PM