TNR BLOGS

December 01, 2008 | 2:02 PM
December 01, 2008 | 1:00 PM
December 01, 2008 | 12:42 PM

December 01, 2008 | 11:22 AM
December 01, 2008 | 11:10 AM
December 01, 2008 | 9:57 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

December 01, 2008 | 1:36 PM
December 01, 2008 | 12:00 PM
November 29, 2008 | 3:23 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
03.10.2008
Palin Saves Herself; Now McCain Faces Reality

The good news for Republicans in last night's vice presidential debate is that Sarah Palin saved herself. Sure, her paper-thin grasp of policy issues and reliance on canned talking points was an embarrassment. She was barely able to cope with a question about the gravest responsibility of the presidency--the potential use of nukes. And many of her sharpest talking points--about funding US troops and the fiendish mainstream media--seemed tailored more for a conservative base already supporting her ticket anyway. Still, before an audience that was prepared for 90 excruciating minutes of Miss South Carolina, Palin avoided committing the kind of indelible, viral-on-YouTube gaffe that would destroy her candidacy, as well as her future political prospects. She drew no blanks, made no major errors of fact. There was no "e" on her potato.

So the calls to dump Palin from the ticket will now stop, except among those hardy Republicans who actually care about her qualifications to be president. (President! Remember that's what we're talking about here, not some high-stakes reality show. In theory, Sarah Palin could be signing executive orders, appointing Supreme Court Justices, and even ordering air strikes on Iran by the time Super Bowl XLIII kicks off in Tampa on February 1. The debate's seemingly-cowed moderator, Gwen Ifill, did disappointingly little to bring that scenario to life.) And with her debate prep and the drip -drip of her network interview gaffes behind her, Palin can now return to whipping up conservative crowds on the stump and charming the obsequious hosts of right-wing talk radio.

Yet what Palin did to actually help--as opposed to not hurting--John McCain is a different question. It's hard to imagine that anything happened last night which dims Barack Obama's very sunny prospects. Palin certainly didn't introduce any damning new facts about Obama's record, or even particularly clever new iterations of old ones. John McCain may have gone to bed last night pleased with the thought that Palin didn't melt down. But as Palin would say, that's looking backwards. Ahead of McCain now is a gruesome tableau, mainly consisting at the moment of the financial crisis, still convulsing on the table like a trauma patient, with McCain in the role of a hapless doctor tangled up in his own stethoscope. Given that prospects for a clean House vote on a financial bailout package are still uncertain, the campaign is sure to spend at least a few more days stuck on an issue that eats away McCain's poll numbers like acid. Meanwhile McCain's team is writing off Michigan as lost, and is now placing bets on weird scenarios like stealing away northern Maine's one electoral vote. In recent days McCain's cranky demeanor has increasingly suggested a man with a sense of creeping doom: He refused to look at Obama during last Friday's debate and frostily accepted his greeting on the Senate floor Wednesday night; he snapped and groused at the Des Moines Register's editorial board; and in B-roll footage of his meanderings around the Capitol hallways these past few days, he has seemed to be grimacing with annoyance (a stark contrast to his rival's unfailingly winning smiles). So, yes, Sarah Palin saved herself tonight. But John McCain is the one who really needs to be saved, and soon it will be too late for that.

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Friday, October 03, 2008 1:15 AM with 18 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

rozenson said:

Sorry to nitpick, but I want to take issue with something you suggested, Mike. Do you really think Ifill should have explicitly hammered home the point that the vice president might become president after, say, an assassination? She did ask a few questions about the vice presidency specifically and that Palin had said on TV a month before she was picked that she didn't know what the office entailed. If Biden or Democratic spinsters want to make the case that Palin isn't ready to take the reins over from Mac, that's fine, but Ifill pressing too hard on that issue would have led the hyper-sensitive right-wing to call foul play.

October 3, 2008 1:50 AM

BryanRDC said:

"...and soon it will be too late for that."

And thank goodness for that fact. We get America back.

October 3, 2008 1:51 AM

moomaw1 said:

Interesting side note in that CBS poll of how 473 uncommitted voters responded to tonight's debate: "Eighteen percent of previously uncommitted say they are now committed to the Obama-Biden ticket. Ten percent say they are now committed to McCain-Palin. Seventy-one percent are still uncommitted."  So, since 9 or 10% of voters say they're still undecided -- although probably 1/3 of them at most watched the debate -- this did add a teensy bit more to Obama's margin (maybe 1/3%, which could be crucial).

October 3, 2008 2:50 AM

asnevitt said:

I think any ongoing talk about this debate is going to be about Palin's expressed desire to further expand the VP powers if she's elected. She wants to "exert power" over the Senate. She agress with Cheney's use of the VP office.

That's simply frightening. It makes her very, very dangerous. She knows that Cheney has really been the one running this administration. Cloaked in a lot of secrecy. She approves and wants to expand on that. She's trying to seek more power and less accountability than the presidency. She's not really running for McCain, she's running for herself. I hope we don't just overlook that little revelation of megalomania.

October 3, 2008 3:41 AM

CharlesFosterKane said:

asnevitt, you're right that she should be called on that, but I suspect the simple truth is, she didn't understand the question and so she blathered incoherently in response. I respect Matthews for pushing people on it, but realy it's giving her the benefit of the doubt to even say she knows what Cheney's done.

October 3, 2008 8:52 AM

icarusr said:

"She's not really running for McCain, she's running for herself."

Of course - that was obvious the first time they were out, when she flipped the order of the ticket.  She really believes her own propaganda.

October 3, 2008 9:03 AM

teplukhin2you said:

Biden was superb.

Is it possible to vote for Biden-McCain?

October 3, 2008 9:07 AM

teplukhin2you said:

what CK said there. She doesn't know what she's talkin' about there, what with the VP there and all. She's ready to put to use her being put to use for the policies there that McCain espouses. There.

October 3, 2008 9:09 AM

tomeg said:

At minimum Palin helped herself and McCain with his/her/their appeal to the base - there's hopping glee at Malkin.com - and she probably convinced those who worried dreaded appalled she was maybe brain-dead. I expect McCain will hold his own in the polls through the weekend, maybe tick up a point or two; then there will be next week.

On style points I give Palin a VG for type, meaning she carried the McCain's banner proudly without stumbling seriously. Same for Biden, better than average for him and pretty good at times. He fulfilled his responsibility to represent Obama with substance and for an old guy passion.

I liked Sarah superficially, and my estimate of her political skills was dead on: she's smart, cagey, quick on uptake, can BS well (she'll get much better as her career continues), and though I cringe whenever I hear the expression, "comfortable in her own skin." (in whose other's skin might she be comfortable?? inane.)

October 3, 2008 10:57 AM

JEFF FREY said:

Tep, you'll have to settle for second-best, and vote for Obama-Biden.

Yes, Palin did OK and SNL will have to make up some words this week to make it funny, unlike last week when Tina Fey just had to read the transcript. But that is victory in the narrowest sense. Menawhile, Biden hammered home the message he wanted to send about John McCain, and Palin could not counter it. Did you count how many times Biden said something critical of McCain? I didn't keep count myself, but there were a lot of them, and Palin had essentially nothing in response. In contrast, Biden moved emphatically to counter her attempts to do the same to Obama.

My take is that the people who might vote for McCain-Palin because of Palin made up their minds long ago.  If she had imploded on stage last night, there would have been more who voted against McCain-Palin because of her, and she avoided that. But undecided viewers certainly got a heavy dose of the message Obama-Biden wanted to get out, and Palin did not get any message out. That makes it a net loss for McCain-Palin.

October 3, 2008 11:42 AM

Mickey Weinber said:

If there's a YouTuber somewhere who will produce a piece which emphasizes Biden's revelatory moment describing his grief at the death of his wife and daughter and struggles as a single father, and pairs it with Palin's insensitive response, unless unforeseen events come into play, the game is over.   McCain requires a sympathetic and warm "hockey mom," not a chilling dragon lady.

October 3, 2008 12:09 PM

mundye said:

tep,

I've gotta give credit where it's due, and that was an excellent Scrubs reference there.

October 3, 2008 1:12 PM

wildboy said:

Tep,

I would probably vote for a Biden-McCain ticket, but I would really fear for this country with John McCain being a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

October 3, 2008 1:47 PM

woland said:

Hey Crowley!

You TNR contribs should write up your thoughts about Biden's most excellent boxing in of Sarah Palin on the issue of gay civil rights.  He got her social conservative winking ass to agree that there should be no difference under the law between the rights of heterosexual couples and homosexual couples!  Yeah, it is essentially separate but equal treatment, but look at the advance of gay rights in only four years.  From nothing to de facto equality.  Kudos to Biden for outsmarting the minx!  

October 3, 2008 3:06 PM

gmrodriguez said:

Call me an elitist, but I agree that it was excruciating to listen to her voice.  It got to the point where I was slamming my head on the table; not only because I couldn't believe the things Joe was letting her get away with, but also because her accent and intonation sound like nails on a chalkboard.  

I really think that Joe should have gone after her a little harder in regards to the fact that she couldn't think of a single economic policy difference between the McCain and Bush proposals.  That, my friends, would have been the ultimate knock-out punch.  

Biden: "Gwen, could you please ask her for just a single difference?"

Ifill: "Mrs. Palin?"

Palin: "Well, Mr. McCain proposes tax cuts for-"

Biden:"No, hold on, allow me to interrupt for a second...I said, a difference, please?"

Palin: "Ahhhhhhh....Oh cooome oohhhnn nooww Joooee!"

I was also a little confused as to why he didn't go a little farther with an attack after she made the comment that she should have authority over the Senate when asked what the VP does.  But, political sophistication is not necessary when it comes to governing a state that pays its citizens between one and two thousand dollars a year to live there.

October 3, 2008 4:15 PM

fougasseu said:

Sarah "Jesse Ventura" Palin chooses to help herself (playing to Talk Radio, evangelicals, and far right reactionaries) rather than helping McCain (who desperately needs to woo moderates and independents). Looks like she's learning fast. This pit bull may prove to be just what Rush Limbaugh has been yearning for, a white trash populist with a massive ego, who channels Phyllis Schlafly, and who can keep the Republicans in thrall to the nutjobs.

Nice work, Sarah!

October 3, 2008 4:50 PM

moldndecay said:

Noun, verb, maverick.  

blech.

October 3, 2008 10:43 PM

americapolyphony said:

Je ne sais pas s'il y a parfois une tendance des médias à vouloir dire qu'il y a eu match nul dans un débat pour faire médiatiquement durer le suspense. Surtout en ce moment aux Etats-Unis avec Barack Obama qui creuse l'écart dans le...

October 4, 2008 3:51 AM