TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
29.09.2008
The Republicans Who Voted For It

One interesting metric in today's bailout-bill vote:

Republicans as a whole went two-thirds against the bill. But retiring Republicans, the ones who don't have to worry about being re-elected in November, overwhelmingly voted for it, eighteen to four (using this list of retirements, with one no-show).

That shows what a political vote this was, but it also highlights an increasingly dominant House dynamic: the rise of the conservatives, what a friend calls the proponents of "free trade, libertarianism, true free markets, freedom from government intervention in a wide range of sectors, true, rock-ribbed, hard core conservatism," led by younger Reps. Jeb Hensarling and Mike Pence. Hensarling and Pence flexed their muscles and showed their power by opposing this bill. Most of this year's retirements are from the more moderate wing of the party, which is feeling less and less comfortable in the House these days.

Update: The specific retiring GOPers voting against it are, I believe, John Doolittle, Jim Ramstad, Duncan Hunter, and Rick Renzi. I didn't count Kenny Hulshof and Steve Pearce, because while they're retiring from the House, they're running for other offices.

--Eve Fairbanks

Posted: Monday, September 29, 2008 4:54 PM with 9 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

ejbenjamin said:

Or maybe they're looking forward to a nice long post-Congress career in the financial sector.

September 29, 2008 5:46 PM

observer.com said:

The Dow had its largest one-day drop in history . Barack Obama says the bailout isn't dead . In what

September 29, 2008 5:57 PM

cal80 said:

Why isn't anyone talking about all the Democrats (40%!) who voted against it?  What was their problem?  They are the majority party and could have passed this if they had some leadership.  Pelosi and Hoyer didn't do their homework.

September 29, 2008 6:36 PM

ndmackenzie said:

cal80 writes:

-- They are the majority party and could have passed this if they had some leadership.

Surely, we should expect bipartisan leadership when passing a bill costing 5% of GDP. Today's fiasco was the fault of appalling leadership in the Republican Party - after all a MAJORITY of Democrats voted for it.

September 29, 2008 7:34 PM

Crock1701 said:

Actually, from what I've heard Cal: Pelosi and Hoyer got exactl what they said they would.  They saw they'd get 140 votes, they got 140 votes.  Boehner promised 80, and he couldn't deliver.  That's why the House GOP is getting the blame. (It didn't help when their drama-queen behavior wrecked the Wed. meeting and everyone noticed.)

September 29, 2008 8:30 PM

sleepyavl said:

Crock, you're wasting your time with Cal80. The Republican who would admit a mistake has not yet been born.

September 30, 2008 1:33 AM

luispc said:

"Republicans as a whole went two-thirds against the bill. But retiring Republicans, the ones who don't have to worry about being re-elected in November, overwhelmingly voted for it"

Well, Ms. Fairbanks, perhaps democracy is something that REALLY WORKS! Or do you stand against it?

September 30, 2008 8:45 AM

butchie b said:

Here's one.  GOP House members should be ashamed.  Yes, there was no call for the Speaker to make a fundraising speech on the floor.  But then, she's an embarassment to the House already.

But with the economy in the balance, they needed to put their tender feelings aside, poor babies.

The only analysis I heard that makes sense is that representatives who have or recently have had a tough election voted no.  If not, they voted yes.  Not 100%, to be sure, but still.

A pox on both their houses, and come Thursday it better be different.

September 30, 2008 11:12 AM

Lundell said:

Rubbish Cal (and i don't mean that personally).  On a bill like this, both sides make commitments and neither side goes further than is poltically wise.  Pelosi and Hoyer had a majority of their members voting for the bill and, appropriately, a majority of Republicans should have voted for the bill.  If that's the case, this phase of the mess is all behind us.  There comes a time for statesmanship and this was one of those times.

I believe it was especially incumbent on the Republicans to step forward, as they were in control of the place from 1995-2007 and it's impossible for them to dodge responsibility for decisions made during that time that helped contribute to this mess.

The thing that really strikes me as funny is that conservatives used to tweak liberals who had cars with "He's Not My President" bumper stickers as being unpatriotic.  Looks like there was a run on those bumper stickers yesterday in the Republican part of the parking lot.

September 30, 2008 3:20 PM