TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 4:05 PM
July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
10.09.2008
Your Views on North Korea, Ms. Palin?


The news that North Korean despot Kim John Il may be dying or dead is more than a little unsettling. The lines of succession in that desperate country, which has perhaps a dozen nuclear weapons, are unclear. US intelligence about the hermit kingdom is pitifully thin.

In other words, this is white-knuckle stuff. And if I'm the Obama campaign, I'm pushing the media to envision how a President Palin might handle it. For starters, ABC's Charlie Gibson could perform a real public service in his upcoming interview with Palin by pressing for her views on our negotations with North Korea, its nuclear program, and what Kim's death would mean.

The Russian invasion of Georgia last month was a real boon to McCain's campaign, which used it to cast a spotlight on Obama's experience. A crisis in North Korea could bring the silly cultural debates over Sarah Palin's back to the sort of thing this campaign should really be about--stuff like, you know, preventing American cities from getting nuked.

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:58 AM with 11 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

BHLnyc said:

What's the difference between Kim Jong Il and Sarah Palin? High heels.

September 10, 2008 8:43 AM

aeromonas said:

Are you kidding, Crowley?  Obama's running against McCain, not Palin, and in any hypothetical comparison between Obama & McCain as to how well they'd confront a crisis on the Korean peninsula, Obama loses.  I'm the hardest of hardcore Obamanistes, and even I can see that.

September 10, 2008 9:03 AM

literatehobo said:

Your views on North Korea, Mr. Obama? Do we have any idea what Obama believes or would do with regards to this type of situation? If Crowley's going to panic about a VP's unknown approach, perhaps he would do well to look into Obama's and McCain's approach?

September 10, 2008 9:16 AM

stanmvp48 said:

Everyone assumes she will get tripped up  over a matter of substance.  Actually, Quayle didn't get tripped up over a substantive issue; he muffed a routine softball question about what he would do first if he suddenly became president.  The kind of thing any marginally intelligent human being could answer without being prepared.  For that matter Ted K. was stumped about why he was running, if I recall correctly.  

Pailin may be well enough briefed to toss of 50 words of boiler plate on most subjects.  But I'll bet if you toss her a cream puff such as "Who are your favorite Presidents?"  What are the greatest speeches in American political history"  What historical events do you most wish you had witnessed?"  What college courses influenced you most?- you would get the Dan Quayle deer in the headlights look

September 10, 2008 9:39 AM

MajMike said:

I think she'd be lucky to find NK on a map, and probably doesn't know we are still technically in a state of war with them (we're in a 56 year ceasefire).  She didn't even have a passport until just before she became governor, her foreign policy readiness is not just deficient, it's non-existent.

September 10, 2008 9:54 AM

lymon1 said:

To echo Aero and Stanv. -- good Lord Crowley, you don't think they'll have her prepped to answer questions on North Korea?  I'd be more afraid that Biden, in his hubris, slips up and the GOP trumps up some "Palin knows more than Biden" theme.  

September 10, 2008 11:44 AM

ironyroad said:

Obama wins in any run-off over how to deal with North Korea because McCain gives the impression that he can't ride herd on his own decision-making.

September 10, 2008 12:49 PM

hemlock41 said:

What stanmvp said (about cream puff questions.)

September 10, 2008 7:54 PM

Geoff G said:

We seem to be forgetting that Alaska is closer to Pyongyang than it is to Miami, Florida or Brownsville, Texas (it's a shorter flight, anyway) - I bet that the Alaska National Guard already has plans to take out Kim Jr. as soon as General Palin and What'shisname take office. Also, according to a sign in front of the NK Embassy in Jakarta, the "Original and Still the King" Dear Leader, Kim il Sung, is immortal. (I'm sure this appears at other branches of the NK embassy in countries that recognize the Herman's Hermits Kingdom.)  If so, he'll be in charge if Little Kim lacks a similar ability to overcome the Grim Reaper and thus departs this mortal coil. In any event, Obama was educated at a North Korean madrassa for several years, so whatever happens, if he's in charge, it will be bad for America and good for North Korea. (Except, of course, for the fact that Obama wants to teach NK kindergartners to perform oral sex as a condition for passing into elementary school, a proposal that is still viewed skeptically by most of the Old Guard, but is quite exciting to the younger generation of 70-somethings poised to take over when the Old Guard passes.)

September 10, 2008 9:46 PM

Robert Powell said:

Dear (any) Candidate:

Kim Jong Chol, Kim Jong Nam, Kim Jong Un, Kim Sol Song, and Kim Hyon Nam are considered, respectively, to be the most likely successors to the North Korean "throne".

Can you talk a little about them, and your efforts to establish what role if any US policy should play in improving bi-lateral relations in the event of a change of leadership?

September 11, 2008 7:17 AM

ChanRobt said:

I don't have much faith in the abilities of intellectuals and lawyers to fight wars-- Lincoln being the Titanic exception.  (And he learned his law on the barricades in the most practical way.)

From the little I know about Palin and the lot I know about Obama, I have a hell of a lot more confidence in her instincts.  We'll see if further exposure to her bears that out.

All that said-- and it is amusing that we (and Obama) are forgetting this-- it is Obama vs McCain, not Obama vs Palin.

September 11, 2008 11:43 AM