TNR BLOGS

December 01, 2008 | 1:00 PM
December 01, 2008 | 12:42 PM
December 01, 2008 | 12:30 PM

December 01, 2008 | 11:22 AM
December 01, 2008 | 11:10 AM
December 01, 2008 | 9:57 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

December 01, 2008 | 1:36 PM
December 01, 2008 | 12:00 PM
November 29, 2008 | 3:23 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
04.09.2008
McCain Tonight: Tell the Swing Voters a Great Story

Thanks to his neo-celebrity running mate, John McCain has one tough act to follow. The upside of Sarah Palin's turbocharged speech last night is that, well, the world is now obsessed with her. The downside: She's overshadowing John McCain, and at the same time has amped up the energy here in a way that puts more pressure on McCain to lift up the crowd. McCain needs to muster as much energy as he naturally can. (I like the idea of having him come from behind the podium and walk around carrying his mic, but that involves various risks, including possible trouble seeing the teleprompter.) Bu fundamentally, McCain should do what he does best, even if that means sticking to familiar territory.

At the same time, after all, Palin has freed McCain from some of the complexities he faced prior to her successful rollout. Two weeks ago, McCain was facing a possible high wire act in which he would at once try to distance himself from George Bush while throwing enough red meat to assure conservatives that they can trust him. On the second score, however, Sarah Palin has done much of the work for him. She's a dog whistle--sorry, make that air raid siren--to evangelicals and pro-lifers and the NRA that McCain understands who calls the shots in the party.

Tonight, then, McCain's prize should be independents and moderate Democrats. There are plenty of ways to do this, to be sure--but many don't come naturally to McCain. He of the seven homes can't oversell his empathy for the downtrodden working man, for instance. He can't affect a homespun rural drawn. No, McCain only shines when he speaks from his heart--and he flops, as he did that June night before the awful lime green background--when he's faking it. So he should stick with the themes that can both light him up rhetorically and stir swing voters: Character, reform and service.

In McCain's life narrative, these three themes flow together seamlessly: McCain is a patriot who served his country, demonstrated character by withstanding unimaginable trials in Hanoi, and further proved himself by fighting to make Washington more accountable through political reform--which in turn is itself a form of service. This is hardly novel stuff, to be sure: McCain has told this basic story for many years. But that's because it works. Along with the chief author of tonight's speech, Mark Salter (read my recent Salter profile here), McCain has published five books based on these core themes, and all have been best-sellers. McCain has one of the best stories in American politics, and he should stick with it.

Will McCain's life story alone be enough to win over swing voters? It could be. His narrative is compelling enough to distract people from the reality that he has become a career politician and Washington fixture. (I especially recommend a video prequel featuring footage of McCain's incredible--and comparatively little- known--Bruce Willis-like escape from an exploding fighter jet on the deck of the USS Forrestal.) The emphasis on character allows voters to believe he can stand up to the corrupt GOP establishment they've come to loathe. And his reform message in particular, has, over the years, been among the single most powerful ways of reaching the independent Perot voters who, as TNR's John Judis often notes, are the key prize in American politics today; these are neither good-government types nor culture-warriors but rather folks who resent the idea, more on populist/pragmatic grounds than ideological ones, that Washington is an unaccountable place that carelessly squanders tax dollars and ignores simple common sense.

But the clincher is McCain's tale of service. Iraq has calmed enough that discussions of the military are no longer completely tainted by imminent horrors of war. To the contrary, McCain can link his own service to his support for the surge--to his conviction that the American military, given the full support it needs, can accomplish any task we ask of it. And flowing from that is a larger appeal to his viewers' patriotism, and an optimistic vision that American greatness and pride can be restored. McCain should treat the surge not as an example of bellicose foreign policy, but as a case study in how he can lead America back to strength.

Which is where McCain's core narrative dovetails with the Republican case against Obama. Extended discussions of character and patriotism implicitly refer back to last night's critiques of Obama as wishy-washy, self-important, and driven by personal ambition. Facing a big deficit on most issues the Republicans are, as McCain's campaign manager Rick Davis weirdly acknowledged this week, running a campaign about character. It's a deplorable way to win the White House, but it's all the GOP has got. McCain had better tell the story of a lifetime, in more ways than one.

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Thursday, September 04, 2008 2:15 PM with 5 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

teplukhin2you said:

"She's overshadowing John McCain"/ Huh? She's overshadowing _Obama_. The resemblances between Palinama and Obamalin are obvious to everyone, and all the comparisons are between her readiness and his, her cultural tropes and his, her lifestory and his.

McCain has any number of cards he can play here, all of which would allow him to cast himself as Reagan to Obama's Carter. Energy security = national security = economic security is the obvious one, and should be the grand theme. Putin's on the march. Bear in the woods etc.

A sub-theme is restoring our manufacturing prowess through all kinds of tax cuts and subsidies for the auto manufacturers as they re-tool to produce alt energy cars.

He could also propose federalizing the Big 2.5's healthcare obligations while he's at it, and segway into a discussion of his healthcare subsidy for working families. (Hint to Jay Khosla: raise that $5k subsidy for couples with children to $10k, and knock it down for childless yuppies and young singles to maybe $2,000).

September 4, 2008 2:40 PM

woland said:

Rick Davis's admission that issues don't matter is a big blunder.  Huge in fact, and Obama was quick to jump on it yesterday and I hope he continues to, if I might borrow a phrase, drill, baby, drill it into the heads of the American people.

Here's why.  Crowley is absolutely correct that the character issue counts for a lot in American Presidential elections.  The last 30 years are testament to this fact.  It is by far the strongest card in McCain's deck now that he has thrown away the experience card with his pick of Palin.  But as much as the American people really do pick a President on "character" the American people do not want to admit to themselves that they don't really care that much about the policy issues and deep down their pick is based on who has character.  This is why when you ask voters to explain why they support a particular candidate, most voters start rattling off policy positions.

The beauty of Rick Davis' comment is that exposes the absolute cynicism of the McCain campaign in manipulating this "dirty secret" to their advantage.  This cynicism goes directly to Obama's meme that that is exactly what the Republicans do each election.  Making elections about small things rather than the large problems we face.  Given all the troubles our county is facing in this election cycle, voters want to believe more than ever before that they are focused on voting issues and not character, even although I think they still will vote mostly on character.  Therefore, Davis' comment is a direct smack in the collective face of all American voters because it exposes their hypocrisy to themselves if McCain wins the election.  McCain voters will have to face the unalterated fact that they voted for a presidential candidate that point blank told them that issues are not important and that he is not running on issues in a year when voters say they are really concerned about policy issues and the direction the country is headed.

Obama has a big opening.  As Kenny Bania would say to Jerry Seinfeld, "It's gold, Jerry!  Gold!"

September 4, 2008 3:21 PM

check said:

mccain wartime experience was 40 years ago. its like running for president in 1960 and talking about wwI .  one more word about his heroism and i will turn off the tv.  enut already.  the entire war hero business in the air right now is boring.  palins casual credit for sending her young son to war was appaling to me.  the entire family portrait of this family was appaling.  passing around this very still baby like a loaf of bread was appaling.  the rich bitch cindy mccain look was awful.  she is so thin and trying so hard to look young with her hair down was laughable.  god, it was a mess. the entire display. and i actually flirted with maybe voting for this guy several months ago.  

September 4, 2008 4:28 PM

ironyroad said:

"The resemblances between Palinama and Obamalin are obvious to everyone."

If you take the wrong perspective, all sorts of things become "obvious."  It's also pretty obvious that the GOP thought it was toast after last Thursday and is scouring around trying to find something to throw between the Obama machine's legs.  Hence the argument that writing a book as opposed to getting someone else to write it for you is actually a disqualification for president.  Hence the weird way in which Palin -- who as far as we're told is only going for the vice-presidency -- compared herself to Obama (and she didn't even mention going to school in Hawaii!).

What's also obvious is that Palin's political philosophy includes stuff that most Americans find too far off the reservation.  There are things that are ok for governor of Alaska, where they tolerate a wide range of behavior, but aren't for the White House.  Palin stands a good chance of eventually becoming a negative in McCain's campaign -- other than for turning out the evangelical base.

September 4, 2008 6:43 PM

GSpinks said:

"The resemblances between Palinama and Obamalin are obvious to everyone"

The McCain campaign is trying to put forth their own "Obama" on order to negate some of his stronger positives. So what? She still has to pass the smell test; so far, I think she's gonna bomb miserably.

"McCain has any number of cards he can play here"

Except he traded in those cards for stronger Republican support by shifting way right; one card he does not have here is the playing both sides of the fense because he's on the record with some hard-line positions which he can't credibly take back without destroying any gains from this week.

"A sub-theme is restoring our manufacturing prowess through all kinds of tax cuts and subsidies for the auto manufacturers as they re-tool to produce alt energy cars."

Except that this is Obama's position; if McCain goes there, Obama gets to drill home McCain's "me too, me too" policy.

"He could also propose federalizing the Big 2.5's healthcare obligations while he's at it,"

Or he could go one better and propose UHC! HA!

"segway into a discussion of his healthcare subsidy for working families."

So, basically McCain could win it if he switches all his policy promises from "All Of The Above" to "Me Too", and then sells his flip flop to the moderates and swing voters...

all of the sudden, I'm feeling this warm, fuzzy feeling creep over my body...

September 4, 2008 8:43 PM