TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:59 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:46 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.07.2008
Jim Gilmore in Hot Water

Wuh-oh:

Former Virginia governor James S. Gilmore III, the state's Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate, submitted false information on two financial disclosure forms that hid his ties to a government contractor embroiled in a legal dispute over allegations that two of its executives had conspired to defraud the federal government.

On the forms, the first filed in June 2007 for his presidential campaign and the second in May after he joined the U.S. Senate race, Gilmore said he was on the board of Windmill International. Gilmore, who signed his name attesting that the information on the forms was "complete and correct," reported that Windmill International was based in Nashua, N.H. But Gilmore was on the board of a Virginia-based company also called Windmill International. The two companies are not affiliated.

Of course, he's insisting it was a clerical error and not an intentional effort at deception. But I think this piece of information largely rules that out: 

Gilmore also reported that Windmill International is a "veterans contract group." Richard L. Manganello, founder and chief executive officer of the New Hampshire company, which describes itself as a contracting firm run by veterans, said neither he nor his business has had any ties to Gilmore ... "I don't recall ever hearing of Jim Gilmore." The Virginia-based Windmill describes itself as "a leading consultancy for financial and government services, as well as project management in Central and Eastern Europe." The description, on its Web site, does not mention veterans.

The Virginia group, in 2005, reported Gilmore as its vice president. Furthermore, he's still listed on their website as part of the "team!" This really deserves the Eliot Spitzer Award for Staggering Stupidity for the month of July, or maybe the whole summer. Who on Team Gilmore thought Googling to find another random company called "Windmill International" would be a clever idea?

--Eve Fairbanks

 

Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:21 AM with 12 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

rriley said:

I'm no fan of Jim Gilmore, but I am a Washington lawyer who's filled out lots and lots of government forms, and it's definitely not impossible that some staffer saw that his boss was affiliated with "Windmill International" and did, indeed, Google it and put down the info - including the location as well as the tie to veterans - for the first one that popped up.  At least as of this morning (Thurs 7/24 8:30 a.m.), the New Hampshire "Windmill International" is still the one that comes up first on Google.

I have no idea of the facts.  But I wouldn't be too dismissive of the "Google-based staff screw-up" explanation.  And if that's what happened on the first form, then forms tend to take on a life of their own and it would probably just be repeated for the second and subsequent filings until people notice, as they certainly have done now.

July 24, 2008 8:48 AM

propositionjoe said:

This is not a Spitzer moment. Paper work deception versus long-term relationships with hookers: you make the call. Besides, this guy is a clown who has no shot of beating Mark Warner in the fall. I look forward to reading about his post-election retirement safari. Bring on the wildebeast!

July 24, 2008 8:56 AM

icarusr said:

Rriley: he signed the bottom of the form - he should know, at the very least, whether the company he is a vice-President of is based in NH or Virginia.

Not Spitzer-quality stupidity, but certainly Stupid-size cupidity.

July 24, 2008 9:15 AM

Rhubarbs said:

I likewise don't suspect active deception or criminal intent here. As anyone who's lived in the commonwealth can tell you, Jim Gilmore really is just that incompetent.

July 24, 2008 9:22 AM

bigfish said:

Perhaps the staffer should've googled "Jim Gilmore AND Windmill International" instead of just "Windmill International."  Boolean searches are better!

July 24, 2008 9:25 AM

Androscoggin said:

My first thought on this -- before even reading Gilmore's defense -- is that an aide was instructed to fill these forms out, he or she Googled "Windmill International," found a website, filled in info related to that company, and assumed that there couldn't be more than one company with the same name. It looks bad given the contractor's legal troubles, but my guess is that this is a product of laziness on the part of staff and lack of oversight on Gilmore's part, not a moronic cover-up attempt.

July 24, 2008 9:27 AM

rriley said:

icarusr - this definitely reflects poorly on Gilmore in any circumstances.  Nobody should sign a form with erroneous information.  I was just speculating how it happened.  It's such a howler that I have a hard time believing it was intentional, so my guess is (1) Google-based staff screw-up followed by (2) Gilmore not reading the form he was signing.  Again, bad moves all around, but perhaps a political misdemeanor rather than a felony, so to speak.

If it turns out the bad information on the form was intentional, then throw the book at him both politically and legally.

July 24, 2008 9:40 AM

icarusr said:

Rhubs and Riley: Well, I guess he will gonzales* himself.

* v., reflexive, (1) to claim incompetence, stupidity and ignorance of the facts as an excuse for the commission of a crime.  Highly believable for a Republican.  Usually accompanied by a moronic grin and a seemingly bottomless capacity for humiliation.  Where the defence works, the claimant will be unable to find work or to sell autobiography. (2) public self-abasement in furtherance of a pointless political quest.

July 24, 2008 10:51 AM

blackton said:

rriley, I agree, he is going to lose anyway so no use kicking a dead dog around.

July 24, 2008 11:08 AM

Rhubarbs said:

blackton, don't you live in, like, Los Estados Unidos de Mexico or something? One of those countries where they call it "cerveza," right? Because "he's going to lose anyway" is not something someone who has lived in the Commonwealth of Virginia would say. Sure, his odds are probably long. Yes, he's a bumbling incompetent and a liar, but he's no more of an incompetent or a liar than he was when he last ran for and won statewide election. In my residency here, the majority of Virginia voters have demonstrated a general preference for candidates who are either stupid or dishonest or both. So don't count Gilmore out until the results from Prince William County are in on Election Night.

July 24, 2008 12:18 PM

jbutler28 said:

i'm from VA and I can tell you...this doesn't matter much Mark Warner is, and will come Nov. election, hand his a$% to him on a silver platter...

July 24, 2008 2:10 PM

jet said:

The focus isn't on the staffer, Gilmore is in trouble over the "signed his name attesting that the information on the forms was "complete and correct," " part.

Regarless of who or if a mistake was made, bottom line, Glimore is responsible for what's in the docs.  As posters have said, the guy's so incompetent he can't win anyway.

July 24, 2008 2:56 PM