TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 5:46 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:03 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:36 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:15 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
10.07.2008
Obama and the Netroots, Part XXVII

There seems to be a lot of low-grade grumbling in the blogosphere about why Obama isn't attending next week's Netroots Nation,* the big blogger convention that's the successor to YearlyKos. (See, for example, these two recent posts at DailyKos.) One source says the feeling is that Obama's stiff-arming the lefty blogosphere, which wouldn't exactly be news. Nor would it come as a surprise during the general election phase of the campaign.

For what it's worth, deputy campaign manager Steve Hildebrand and new media director Joe Rospars are scheduled to do a panel at the event. But, after landing not only Obama but also Hillary and John Edwards last year, I suspect the bloggers are going to feel a bit of a letdown.

*I'm not sure there's been an official announcement, but a Netroots Nation spokesperson confirms this and says Obama is scheduled to be out of the country as far as she knows.

Update: Typo corrected.

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Thursday, July 10, 2008 6:57 PM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Robert Powell said:

Splendid. If he couldn't make the DLC deal, why would anybody expect him to show up for the nutroots? Kos & Co. should go pound sand. Maybe they can get Ralph Nader.

July 10, 2008 7:12 PM

psantillana said:

knows has a k in it.

July 10, 2008 7:39 PM

scrubbyoak said:

Rethink that last sentence, Robert. The platform might just give the narcissistic Ralph Nader more impetus to run. I bet he would love to play the spoiler in november.

July 11, 2008 8:41 AM

scire said:

why don't the members of the netroots grow up already? If they really want their candidate to win, surely they have to realize you don't win a general election by pandering to fringe interest groups.

July 11, 2008 9:54 AM

Rhubarbs said:

scire, it's not even pandering to fringe interest groups. If you break every issue down in isolation from all other issues, all positions are at best plurality, not majority, positions, and therefore "fringe". That includes every policy position you personally hold, as well as every one I personally hold. The point is that no two humans agree with each other on all conceivable points. If you demand that politicians agree with you on all of your personal preferences, you will never be able to vote for anybody ever. Voting for president isn't about perfect, it's about better. The childishness of the "netroots" movement on issues like this is not that they hold "fringe" opinions, it's that they pretend that only perfect adherence to their total agenda is acceptable.

July 11, 2008 10:52 AM

scire said:

rhubarbs: well said. Exactly what I was thinking, but couldn't spit out.

July 11, 2008 11:00 AM

Robert Powell said:

scrubbyoak--

I'm always prepared to do a re-think, but to the best of my knowledge Nader has already thrown his propeller beanie into the ring. He and the nutroots deserve each other. Same smarmy elitism, same pretensions of moral superiority, same image of political toads for most of the rest of the population.

Rhubarbs reminds me of a graph I've always wanted to plot with the majority electorate's preferred  positions on issues depicted as dots on a field divided by a vertical line, "Republican" on one side, and "Democrat" on the other with distance from the centerline describing intensity/degree of radicalism: abortion rights, school vouchers, guns, military spending, energy policy, gay marriage, UHC, social security--the lot. Most dots would cluster around the mid-line with some self-identified Republicans on the Dem side for some issues, and vice versa.

This is the first election in a long time, if not ever, in which self-identified Independents outnumber both Republicans and Democrats. I think Obama's perfectly positioned to personify the zeitgeist here, and he seems to know it. Smacking the nutroots and Jessie Jackson looks like a good move to me.

July 11, 2008 12:06 PM

The Stump said:

Those of us covering the campaign got an e-mail from Obama communications strategist Robert Gibbs a little

July 19, 2008 12:29 PM