TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:59 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:46 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
20.06.2008
Is Republican Swiftboating Going Out of Style?

Jonathan Martin has an interesting piece up about the apparent lack of well-funded GOP 527 groups. He writes:

Conversations with more than a dozen Republican strategists find near unanimity in the belief that, at some point, there will be a real third-party effort aimed at Obama.

But not one knows who will run it, who will pay for it, what shape it will eventually take or when such a group may form.

More worrisome for Republicans who believe such an outside attack apparatus is essential to defeating Obama, some key individuals and groups who were being looked to for help say they won’t be involved.

T. Boone Pickens, the Texas oilman who gave $3 million to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and who numerous GOP sources said was being looked to as a funding source this year, is sitting the race out.

“He is not giving anything to 527s involved in the presidential race this cycle, and has communicated that…to Republican strategists and operatives,” said Pickens spokesman Jay Rosser. ... 

Also staying out of the third-party effort this time is the powerful Republican public affairs firm, the DCI Group.

DCI ran the independent Progress for America (PFA) campaign that raised $45 million to tout George W. Bush and tar John Kerry in 2004. ...

“DCI Group is not and will not be involved in any 527 activity this cycle,” said a spokesman for the group, which has a bevy of image-sensitive corporate clients. “DCI is out of the business.”

Further, Freedom’s Watch, the one third-party group that many conservatives expected to step into the void left by PFA, has decided to exclusively focus on congressional battles.

Asked if was still the intent of Freedom’s Watch to stay out of the presidential fray, Carl Forti, the group’s director, flatly said: “Yes.” 

Jonathan fingers McCain himself for the dearth of anti-Obama 527 activity, noting that, "every individual interviewed for this story cited ... a fear that their party’s nominee will publicly denounce them and hold a grudge." But, as Jonathan notes, the McCain campaign has sent permissive signals to potential funders since wrapping up the nomination. “He wishes that 527s did not exist on either side,” Steve Schmidt, a McCain operative, says in the story. “But he understands that they do. And he certainly isn’t going to say that one side should have them and one side should not in the context of a presidential campaign.”

My own feeling is that this is largely an expression of pragmatism. Granted, there are a lot of rich ideologues out there willing to attack a Democrat regardless of the political fallout. On the other hand, most wealthy Republicans made their money in the corporate world, where the custom is to keep one eye on the bottom line at all times. These guys may be partisans, but they're not stupid. They realize there's a very good chance Obama will be president next year and that he'll enjoy large majorities in Congress. It would be bad for business to provoke the suddenly resurgent Democrats into ruthless acts of vengeance.

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Friday, June 20, 2008 1:51 PM with 10 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

bigm said:

Doesn't this embarrass Obama most of all?  He cited these 527s as the reason he broke his word on public financing.

June 20, 2008 2:45 PM

GSpinks said:

"Doesn't this embarrass Obama most of all?"

Not really: "More worrisome for Republicans who believe such an outside attack apparatus is essential to defeating Obama, some key individuals and groups who were being looked to for help say they won’t be involved. "

Its not that there are no 527s ready to wage a war, its just that all of the big donor guns from 2004 are skipping out this time around.

June 20, 2008 4:13 PM

tjlinko said:

bigm. By the time we get to the point where the anti-Obama 527 effort either does or doesn't materialize, the whole issue of Obama opting out of the public financing system will be so much old news. Besides, virtually nobody outside of the political junkie class really cares much about how campaigns get financed, and for fewer still is it a voting issue.

That said, I wish Obama hadn't focused so much on the 527's as his reason for opting out. Frankly, his best argument is the secondary one he is making, which is that what he has created is a different kind fo public financing. What he needs to point out is that the real purpose of public financing was to try and level the playing field between well-heeled special interests, who used to be the lifeblood of campaigns (and thereby could curry favor) and everbody else. Everyone knows that the system was flawed but it was all we had.

The internet has changed all that, especially with the way Obama's campaign has harnessed its power. Howard Dean's campaign was the first to really tap its power but they didn't really know how to use it effecitvely for organizing, plus Dean wasn't the candidate Obama is.

The reality is that the internet is a tool that allows a candidate with an effective message to bypass the old fundraising infrastructure, and tap into the support of the american public on a much broader scale. And sn't that what public financing really SHOULD be all about?

June 20, 2008 4:20 PM

GSpinks said:

As for the funding itself, I'm thinking it might be indicative of:

a) the big donor guns of the Republican party are not sufficiently thrilled by McCain to drop a couple million dollars (especially in this economy)

b) they seem to think Obama might not be that bad (Obamicans to the rescue?)

c) they want a campaign focused on pollcy issues this time around. (because obviously character isn't going to cut it on Wall St.)

d) they don't want to risk the image-ruining label of "racist"

e) some combination of the above

I have to admit that I don't really care exactly why, as long as I can have my Issues-Orientation election cycle I'm going to be happy.

June 20, 2008 4:20 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Another shrewd post from Noam. Pickens is getting into alternative energy in a big way. He's obviously positioning himself the same way as Vinod Khosla and all the other VCs now jumping on the greentech bandwagon: angling to be the next beneficiary of new energy legislation and govt subsidies.

Still this doesn't address the John O'Neill types, who aren't corporate players, in fact are little guys with zip to gain from any administration. The only possible explanations for _their_ silence are a) tehy actually like Obama, r find him less offensive than they found Kerry,  OR b) that McCain, who stood side by side IIRC with Kerry on Vietnam reconciliation, will not tolerate swift boat stuff.

June 20, 2008 4:22 PM

ackyri said:

Not just Republicans, Noam. The MoveOn Voter Fund is shutting down too.

June 20, 2008 4:40 PM

Noam Scheiber said:

yeah, but it's basically been defunct for years...

June 20, 2008 5:20 PM

scire said:

I think that so many of these guys are convinced that Obama's going to win, that they just don't want to invest the money. Plus, they really aren't that enthused about McCain.

June 20, 2008 10:26 PM

gregstolhand said:

The beauty of the internet is that BHO can unleash tech-savvy followers to track down the people and money behind the 527's and bring those people to the light of day.

The anonymous attacks and emails will not work if web citizens attack back and bring the truth to the surface.

June 21, 2008 8:15 AM

bigfish said:

I don't think Republican Swiftboating is going out of style.

I just think Republicans will Swiftboat like it's going out of style.

June 23, 2008 9:32 AM