TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:59 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
15.05.2008
Oops-a-Daisy

Josh Green's interesting new Atlantic piece on Obama's Silicon Valley money machine offers another entry for the fast-growing Clinton campaign recriminations file:

The Internet was still in its infancy when Bill Clinton last ran for president, in 1996, and most of the immense fortunes had not yet come into being; the emerging tech class had not yet taken shape. So, unlike the magnates in California real estate (Walter Shorenstein), apparel (Esprit founder Susie Tompkins Buell), and entertainment (name your Hollywood celeb), who all had long-established loyalty to the Clintons, the tech community was up for grabs in 2007. In a colossal error of judgment, the Clinton campaign never made a serious approach, assuming that Obama would fade and that lack of money and cutting-edge technology couldn’t possibly factor into what was expected to be an easy race. Some of her staff tried to arrange “prospect meetings” in Silicon Valley, but they were overruled. “There was massive frustration about not being able to go out there and recruit people,” a Clinton consultant told me last year. As a result, the wealthiest region of the wealthiest state in the nation was left to Barack Obama.

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:22 PM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

icarusr said:

'“There was massive frustration about not being able to go out there and recruit people,” a Clinton consultant told me last year.'

Great management skills.  Precisely the kind of strategic vision we want in a President.

May 15, 2008 4:31 PM

liberal reformer said:

This was an amazing oversight. That and not getting better organized in the caucus states. Shows what happens when you are expecting a coronation.

May 15, 2008 4:38 PM

cspencef said:

Would somebody pleeeeeze explain to me how this kind of tactical blunder, not to mention others which are well-documented by now, is in any way congruent with being the best candidate?  libref, I know you're a Clinton supporter, so I ask this in all seriousness, not trying to be snarky at all; why should the Clinton campaign as it has been run throughout this primary season give me any reason to want Democratic superdelegates to cast their lot with Clinton, overruling an all-but-inevitable lead in pledged delegates for Obama?  Keep in mind as you answer that I live in one of those insignificant caucus states that the Clinton campaign didn't so much as lift a finger in to compete.

May 15, 2008 5:03 PM

KeenSally said:

As a native San Josean, I'm always bothered that the 10th biggest city in the nation and the hub of the world's tech industry is treated as just another flyover point on the commute between LA and San Francisco. Good to see that we came and bit Clinton in the ass.

Not that I think SV folks would have gone for Clinton anyhow. We're forward thinkers! Hooray!

May 15, 2008 5:11 PM

blackton said:

Simply put Obama is a young bull who knows the fields, Hillary is an old cow who needs to go home.

I have read that neither Bill or Hillary Clinton even have email accounts. Their time has passed.

May 15, 2008 5:11 PM

blackton said:

really, I think the answer is that she relied on too many people from the previous White House campaigns, these are people who have won before and figure they knew best (the natural arrogance that comes from success) but who simply have not kept up with the times.

May 15, 2008 5:16 PM

stgla said:

Terry McCauliffe probably thought his ten-year old rolodex was all they needed.  Good riddance to him.  

May 15, 2008 5:48 PM

rozenson said:

Obama's supporters are also younger and so they tend to be more tech-savvy. This is why freshness can be good. Mac may be back, but does he know how to use an iPhone?

May 15, 2008 6:02 PM