TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
06.04.2008
Mark Penn Out


From the Clinton campaign:

Statement from Maggie Williams
 
After the events of the last few days, Mark Penn has asked to give up his role as Chief Strategist of the Clinton Campaign; Mark, and Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates, Inc. will continue to provide polling and advice to the campaign.
 
Geoff Garin and Howard Wolfson will coordinate the campaign's strategic message team going forward.

Questions: Was he pushed or did he jump? (Is it possible Penn decided Hillary's chances are too slim to keep sacrificing his corporate work?) What does this mean for the campaign's strategy? (Penn was always a proponent of leadership and experience themes, Wolfson has historically been more keen to humanizer her.)

And here's some background on Garin (who first joined the Clinton campaign in mid-March):

In politics, Mr. Garin has a well-earned reputation for helping candidates win in difficult circumstances. In 2001, Mr. Garin’s strategic research helped Mark Warner win the governorship in Virginia, despite the state’s strong Republican leanings. Mr. Garin has directed the polling and created winning campaign strategies for many of the leading Democrats serving in the U.S. Senate, including Dick Durbin, Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Schumer, Russ Feingold, Robert C. Byrd, Jay Rockefeller, Patrick Leahy, Max Baucus, Kent Conrad, and Byron Dorgan.  In the 2004 presidential election, Mr. Garin was the polling advisor to General Wesley Clark and was the pollster for the Democratic National Committee’s independent expenditure campaign in the general election

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Sunday, April 06, 2008 6:53 PM with 26 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

stgla said:

Thanks for the Garin bio.  Shouldn't this conflict of interest with Penn's lobbying work have disqualified him from the start?

April 6, 2008 7:29 PM

Crock1701 said:

"to humanizer her?"  Little tiny typo...

April 6, 2008 8:11 PM

mollysimon said:

stgla:  you're assuming that Hillary actually cares about such piddling matters as conflict of interest. There was always a conflict--it just hadn't been publicized until now.

April 6, 2008 8:14 PM

ralphnelle said:

My own sources say he got the boot because he was consistently bankrupting her campaign with his monthly donut bills.

April 6, 2008 8:28 PM

WoodyBombay said:

So Penn gives up his official title, and I assume won't be talking to the press anymore, but "will continue to provide polling and advice to the campaign."

So he's not really leaving.

April 6, 2008 9:06 PM

miceelf said:

Why do I hear the song "Born Free" playing in my head?

April 6, 2008 9:19 PM

timteeter said:

ARG tonight:

PA--Clinton 45: Obama 45

Penn had to go.  Time for a Hail Mary pass . . .

April 6, 2008 10:55 PM

psantillana said:

I don't think he's really leaving either, same as Sandy Berger. He's just not going to get paid. Over the table. See how distrustful I am? Do you wonder why?

Related yet new thought, as of only just now:

CDS, Clinton Derrangement Syndrome, is supposed to be a disease where you just hate them no matter what. You cannot see any facts through anything but your hatin'-Clinton[s] glasses. BDS is supposed to be the same thing for Bush. Here's my thought: BDS is supposed to be had by Democrats, right? We hate Bush not for what he's done, but because we're filthy commie hippies, and we have to project our hatred for freedom and individual responsibility on this poor man, because we need an effigy to burn.

But why do I hate both of them? How is CDS explained when it shows up in people who want universal health care, for us to get out of Iraq, to stop torturing people, to keep abortion legal, and to repeal the Bush tax cuts for the rich? How did I get this disease? Isn't it supposed to be for people who hate powerful women or something?

Explain, please.

April 6, 2008 11:39 PM

ralphnelle said:

This segment of Hardball from the pre-Iowa days should go down as a defining moment in the campaign:

youtube.com/watch

It's Penn at his slimiest. Trippi's response to Penn is absolutely priceless.

April 7, 2008 12:21 AM

teplukhin2you said:

You're awfully psychoanalytical these days, psantillana. Just sayin'

April 7, 2008 5:21 AM

roidubouloi said:

Too little, too late.

April 7, 2008 7:39 AM

Rhubarbs said:

I don't understand why this latest kerfluffle should force Penn off the Hillary campaign. He's done much worse work for anti-union clients and for big polluters in the past. If Hillary and her AFSCME masters were cool with Penn's union-busting work, why should the Columbia meeting bother them?

April 7, 2008 9:30 AM

BHLnyc said:

Now if only Wolfson would follow suit.

These two hacks were so unappealing and appeared to be so out-of-touch with reality that they --- almost more than anything else about Hillary's campaign -- turned me off from even considering voting for her. They embodied everything that I disliked about the Clintons themselves: the shading of the truth, the partisan rhetoric, the programmed, poll-tested responses. And the fact that it took Hillary so many months to finally pull the trigger on this guy only reconfirms what a bad manager she really is.

April 7, 2008 9:33 AM

tembrach said:

This marks the nadir of the Clinton campaign. In years from now, historians will note that on April 7th, the campaign was in the doldrums dispirited, and beset on all sides by enemies & media turncoats. But by the evening of April 22, after HRC had routed Obama by 70%-25% in PA, the momentum had switched to her. And by May 6th, when Hillary effectively destroys Obama in Indiana, superdelegates began to abandon the banner of Barack and embrace that of HRC.

Remember, it is always darkest before the dawn. Don’t give up HRC!!

April 7, 2008 10:01 AM

roidubouloi said:

rhubarbs,

You don't believe the cover story, do you?  It's a face-saver.  That's all.  Doesn't need to withstand scrutiny any more than "resigning to spend more time with my familly" does.

April 7, 2008 10:08 AM

Rhubarbs said:

No, BHLnyc, the fact that she hired them in the first place proves what a bad manager she really is. The problem is not failing to fire bad advisers, the problem is hiring so many people who later need to be fired.

April 7, 2008 10:16 AM

virginiacentrist said:

Garin isn't doing much. And they're still paying Penn's polling firm.

April 7, 2008 10:38 AM

blackton said:

ralphnelle, that is a classic bit. And the fact that the two were standing! next to each other made it  priceless. You couldn't even cast a more odious, shifty little weasel if you tried. Honestly, if Mark Penn doesn't find a career in Hollywood as a villainous pig (white collar crook, adulterer, murderer, sheep molester) then Hollywood has no imagination.

April 7, 2008 10:45 AM

Daily Intelligencer - New York Magazine said:

If nothing else, it's a morale boost to Clinton staffers who chafed at Penn's presence.

April 7, 2008 11:05 AM

StraussGuy said:

Garin is qualified to lead a tough campaign?

"In 2001, Mr. Garin’s strategic research helped Mark Warner win the governorship in Virginia, despite the state’s strong Republican leanings."

Okay, granted, but, if the test is Garin's ability to pilot a campaign to victory in Republican territory, then the list of senators whose other campaigns he managed is unimpressive: "Dick Durbin, Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Schumer, Russ Feingold, Robert C. Byrd, Jay Rockefeller, Patrick Leahy, Max Baucus, Kent Conrad, and Byron Dorgan."  Compared to Virginia, for a Democrat to win in Illinois, California, NY State, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Vermont, Montana, or the Dakotas is almost a piece of cake.  I wonder which losing campaigns Garin has managed.

April 7, 2008 11:06 AM

Historian1956 said:

blackston,

That is priceless!  He could be the next actor, like the ones that came out of Watergate, Fred Thompson and G. Gordon Liddy, only they didn't really play the bad guys in movies and TV, they played them in real life.  His only downfall, though, as far as a Hollywood career goes is that he doesn't have the dry, witty, sense of humor those two had.

April 7, 2008 11:30 AM

dirkleisure said:

Somebody who is "out" is somebody who is no longer part of the campaign.

Mark Penn will continue to be paid, and paid a lot, by the Clinton campaign.  How exactly is Mark Penn "out"?

Hard to say how he has been forced out or is now off the campaign when he is still cashing checks.

April 7, 2008 11:31 AM

timteeter said:

Is it just me, or does Mark Penn look like the love child of Bob Shrum?

April 7, 2008 12:09 PM

adaglas said:

"I once ate a pot roast this big...."

Sorry, couldn't resist a caption.

April 7, 2008 12:30 PM

tomeg said:

Rhubarbs puzzles:

"I don't understand why this latest kerfluffle should force Penn off the Hillary campaign. He's done much worse work for anti-union clients and for big polluters in the past. If Hillary and her AFSCME masters were cool with Penn's union-busting work, why should the Columbia meeting bother them?"

It's that the press/cable/web hounds all smell blood and odor and are barking up a storm that will not abate until they've had their way with him. Soon if not already other scents will lead to more quarry, possibly including the fox queen herself.

April 7, 2008 12:47 PM

jhildner said:

Hillary after the Goolsbee NAFTA business:

"I would ask you to look at this story and substitute my name for Sen. Obama's name and see what you would do with this story.  Just ask yourself [what you would do] if *some of my advisers had been having private meetings with foriegn governments.*"

Oops.

April 7, 2008 2:29 PM