TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
04.04.2008
Hillary's Cash Crunch?

Newsweek's Romano thinks Hillary may have raised only $7 million in primary--as opposed to general-election--funds last month, and concludes (reasonably, I think) that any primary endgame may have less to do with a superdelegate swarm or a Dean-Pelosi-Reid-Gore poobah intervention than possible bankruptcy:

As the clock ticks down, Clinton will have fewer chances to gain delegates and votes, and Obama will appear more and more inevitable. Wins in Indiana and North Carolina on May 6--hardly a sure thing, but possible--would only accelerate that process. All of which is to say that if Obama "looks like the nominee" at some point before the convention, Clinton's financial intake may flatline. In that case, she probably won't have the rainy-day money necessary to keep fighting (unless it's more of her own). Meaning that it won't matter what Bill has to say. The bank vault will have already spoken.

Update: The campaign says "almost all" of last month's money is primary-eligible. 

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Friday, April 04, 2008 3:21 PM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

adaglas said:

What's that sound....dear God....that's Rhubarbs' theme music!

April 4, 2008 3:33 PM

tkozal said:

Drudge says 109,000,000 since he left office.

thats 109 Million.

Should help her fund raising...not!

She truly represents the working classes...working classes!

I found that essence rare....

(thanks to Gang of Four)

April 4, 2008 3:59 PM

lymon1 said:

tkozal:

Does that mean the Kennedys don't represent the working class either?   How much did they give to charity (the Obama's gave 1%, though I'd expect the Clintons to do at least 5%)

April 4, 2008 4:09 PM

tkozal said:

No, his wealth was inherited, noblese oblige...a concept non-existent in Clinton land, what with first daughter going to work for a freakin Hedge Fund..Hedge Fund!

She's done, she needs to go, now...

Lies, pathological, a desire for wealth, even from crooks in Kazakhstan, doesn't the bile rise in your throat, and make you ill, it does for me...

April 4, 2008 4:19 PM

bcbaird said:

Dude.  Just... Dude.  Wow.

April 4, 2008 5:16 PM

lymon1 said:

I see -- the working poor should know their place.  Anyway, when you get done crucifying Al Gore for having a kid who endangered our childrens lives (since if this is how you feel about Chelsea Clinton, I can't imagine the unhinged rage you must feel towards Al Gore Jr.), get back to us.  

April 4, 2008 5:32 PM

blackton said:

Lymon, wtf? why lie? of course you know Obama gave much more than 1%. Let us not forget that the Clintons are not releasing this years income taxes. Has Bill received a $20 million payout from Yucaipa, a supermarket holding company that invests in tax shelters in the Cayman Islands? We don't know, the Clinton's asked for an extension. Clinton Spokesman Claimed That Yucaipa Is Registered In Cayman So That Bill Clinton Can Pay US Taxes. “Jay Carson, a Clinton spokesman, said that while the former president hasn’t ``severed ties’’ with Yucaipa, he ``is taking steps to ensure’’ that ``there will be an appropriate transition for those relationships’’ if his wife receives the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

And no, the Kennedy's don't speak for the poor, why even bring them up? Oh, because they endorsed Obama, right? Queen Hillarich has no idea about how normal people live which is why she can't connect with any of them. It is the pretense of the Clintons that aggravates. Gore is out to save the environment, Clinton pisses on the poor and tells them it is needed rain.

April 4, 2008 6:34 PM

WaltB said:

Passion for the working class and poor??  Don't forget Bill 'restructured' benefits for them, just as he had in Arkansas.

April 5, 2008 8:00 AM

ChanRobt said:

Talk about a golden parachute, is there any more profitable way to spend 8 years than as president of the United States?  And the bigger your scandals the better because it makes your book more titillating and the advances and the sales bigger.

Meanwhile, are the Clintons go going to keep bitching that the rich don't pay enough taxes.  Weren't theirs 35% or so?  Do they think anyone ought to pay even more than that?  Because the government, like, spends our money so well?

April 5, 2008 2:37 PM

ChanRobt said:

CORRECTO:  my above post was meant for the story about Clinton riches.

April 5, 2008 2:48 PM

AaronBBrown said:

If the Clintons really believe we can win, then I think they should spend every dime of their personal fortune on this primary. I'd love to see them actually have to start working for a living after they've destroyed their credibility and personal appeal in this election. Bill can retire to condo life on Miami Beach, and Hillary will get a job as a personal injury lawyer, I think she would make a crackerjack ambulance chaser.  :-)

April 5, 2008 6:33 PM

psantillana said:

Chan,

Not only is it a golden parachute, but he wants to get back on the plane.

April 6, 2008 11:35 AM

tomeg said:

The Obamas gave only 1% to charity? That's something to think about. Was the proportion higher in prior years? Lower? Don't ask me why, but I see this as a pink flag. Do they pledge anything to their church? If not then there's something really in need of further investigation as it goes right to Obama's value of social responsibility and his professed faith.

April 7, 2008 5:56 PM