TNR BLOGS

May 09, 2008 | 9:33 AM
May 08, 2008 | 8:55 PM
May 08, 2008 | 6:06 PM

May 09, 2008 | 12:12 AM
May 08, 2008 | 5:13 PM
May 08, 2008 | 1:57 PM

May 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
May 02, 2008 | 5:26 PM
May 02, 2008 | 2:40 PM

May 08, 2008 | 9:12 PM
May 08, 2008 | 3:26 PM
May 08, 2008 | 2:38 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
28.03.2008
Obama Gets a Nod From Senator Who?

Mike Allen blogging over at Ben Smith describes freshman Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey's Obama endorsement today as a "big break for Obama" and something that will "help Obama with Roman Catholic voters," since Casey's a Roman Catholic. I'm not sure I agree. Has there been any senatorial endorsement in this race that's really affected a primary's outcome? Senators tend not to have the kind of local support networks and political machines that mayors or governors can deploy on behalf of their choice. And in terms of Casey's star power throughout the state -- well, reviews of his first year in office in the Pennsylvania newspapers this winter tended to use words like "subdued," "low-key" (read: invisible), and "Senator who?" An excerpt:

"Of this freshman class, he is definitely the name that doesn't usually come up in conversations or sort of in general reading of news," said Jennifer Duffy of the Cook Political Report, an independent newsletter.

"At least in the beltway, he hasn't kind of established himself as a presence, whether it's on any given issue," she said.

Update: I see Noam disagrees. Parsing Casey's influence in different parts of the state still seems to me to be overthinking it a little bit: The race has so super-saturated the media by now that it's hard to imagine a significant proportion of voters making their minds up thanks to Casey's recommendation (unlike when an official endorses a candidate a lot of voters just don't know), and Casey hasn't grown his influence this year. But never let it be said we don't provide you with contrasting points of view.

Update 2: A valued reader writes in to note that the "Bob Casey" franchise in Pennsylvania goes back a lot further than just this Bob Casey, and therefore has a good deal more weight.

--Eve Fairbanks

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:55 AM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

tkozal said:

My conservative fathers liberal Catholic Pastor is all crazy for Obama. My father ended up caucussing for Obama in Nebraska.

I think you would be surprised at the catholic support for Obama, the anti-war position, the lack of screeching "hands of my body" old feminists, etc...and no evil schoolmarm monster in a bad pantsuit....

March 28, 2008 12:23 PM

razibkhan said:

"Has there been any senatorial endorsement in this race that's really affected a primary's outcome?"

eve, you get paid to comment on politics, right?  why doesn't <a href="matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/.../this_is_impact.php">this chart</a> which shows a mass spike for obama in mass. have no impact on you?  do political reporters view the world as binary, so unless candidate X wins after an endorsement it doesn't count? i've seen this CW about endorsements not counting over & overl; so i assume that reporters think in binary....

March 28, 2008 1:20 PM

Wandreycer1 said:

Lovely - Obama can count on the sexism vote.

I'm an Obama supporter and just as an FYI - we'll STILL tell you to keep your hands off our bodies - he will too.

March 28, 2008 1:22 PM

ramboorider said:

It at least helps get Obama a second look from a lot of the voters who wouldn't have given him a first look before. Casey's family is pro-gun, pro-life, and always got support from the working class, conservative wing of the party. Rendell killed him in the guv primary in '02 because Rendell's a natural politician and Casey's a quiet, hard-worker. He's another case of a relatively cautious pol who wouldn't endorse Obama unless he thought it was in the bag. Obama won't come close to winning here in PA, but Casey's endorsement will help him keep it closer than it otherwise would have been.

March 28, 2008 1:33 PM

blackton said:

Casey was adamant he would remain neutral so as to be a peacemaker. This has to be seen as a clear rebuke to Hillary and her campaign. How long until the Hillaryites start to whine about him, how he went back on his word, betrayed the voters of Pa. blah blah.

What matters most about Casey is that it is showing signs of a huge crack in Hillary's quest to secure the superdelegates.

March 28, 2008 1:43 PM

The Stump said:

Three more quick thoughts about Casey: 1.) Is it just me, or are there crazier vice presidential picks

March 28, 2008 1:48 PM

boxofrox said:

"What matters most about Casey is that it is showing signs of a huge crack in Hillary's quest to secure the superdelegates"

Bingo.

March 28, 2008 2:03 PM

The Stump said:

Dan Balz&#39;s take on the Indiana primary got me thinking about a subtle advantage Obama has in the

April 25, 2008 11:29 AM

Double click this space to insert your ad.