TNR BLOGS

August 19, 2008 | 11:10 PM
August 19, 2008 | 9:13 PM
August 19, 2008 | 5:53 PM

August 19, 2008 | 5:17 PM
August 19, 2008 | 5:12 PM
August 19, 2008 | 11:32 AM

August 19, 2008 | 6:06 PM
August 19, 2008 | 3:49 PM
August 17, 2008 | 9:21 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

August 19, 2008 | 1:59 PM
August 19, 2008 | 12:43 PM
August 18, 2008 | 6:20 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
11.03.2008
Eliot Spitzer As Alexander Portnoy

I've been racking my brain for a character profile that would shed light on what the hell happened with Eliot Spitzer, and the only thing I'm coming up with is ... Alexander Portnoy, the Assistant Commissioner of Human Opportunity for the City of New York (and anti-hero of Philip Roth's famous novel). Like Portnoy, maybe Spitzer felt simultaneously driven (by stultifying parents) to be a good Jewish boy and rebel against his good Jewish boy-ness, and so you get the weird spectacle of the most upright guy in the world acting out some pretty deviant urges.

This graf from the Times 1969 review of the novel kind of gets to the heart of the matter: 

As Portnoy matures--at least chronologically--he desperately wants to tear off his American-Jewish hair shirt, to let go, to live a life without mother and father, a sex life free and unfettered, without guilt, to be bad in other words ("Because to be bad, Mother," he apostrophizes, "that's the real struggle; to be bad--and enjoy it! That's what makes men of us boys, Mother. . .LET'S PUT THE ID BACK IN YID!"). But instead he finds--or his analyst does--that "neither fantasy nor act issues in genuine sexual gratifications but rather in overriding feelings of shame and the dread of retribution, particularly in the form of castration."

This riff from the original Time review is also worth reading:

Although sex, psychoanalysis and Jewishness form the content of the novel, they are not its subject. The book is about absurdity—the absurdity of a man who knows all about the ethnic, sociological and Freudian hang-ups, yet is still racked by guilt because his ethical impulses conflict with the surge of his animal desires. In Alexander Portnoy's own words, he is "torn by desires that are repugnant to my conscience, and a conscience repugnant to my desires."

Strung out on Dr. Spielvogel's couch, Portnoy becomes the first of the lie-down comics. Raised in Newark and now holding the post of Assistant Human Opportunities Commissioner in New York City, he renders his past absurd in an attempt to lessen its painful grip on him. He keens the familiar tale of the strongwilled, overattentive mother and the castrated father. He tells how his mother fondled him during toilet training, how she eroticized the insides of his ears while removing the wax, and how she forced him to eat at knife point. Portnoy is continuingly being floored by the fact that she could be so unconscious of the unconscious.

With love and hate, he recalls his father, a shambling insurance salesman who proselytizes for the religion of security, yet suffers from chronic constipation because his intestinal tract is in the hands of the firm of "Worry, Fear & Frustration." In a life devoted to trying to please his parents, Portnoy confesses that his penis was all he could call his own. ...

As an adult, Portnoy makes his most strenuous escape attempt with the aid of the Monkey, a hypererotic fashion model from the impoverished hills of West Virginia who is the fulfillment of Portnoy's steamiest adolescent sex fantasies. The Monkey business ends in a frenzied bedroom burlesque in Rome, made the merrier by the participation of an Italian prostitute. Comments Portnoy: "I can best describe the state I sub sequently entered as one of unrelieved busy-ness." But instead of solving his problem, the Monkey is just another source of shame. She wants Alex's social respectability while he is interested only in satisfying his endless desires.

By using the psychoanalytic monologue as a literary device, Roth has achieved an individuality of tone and gesture and a retrieval of detail that transform his characters into super-stereotypes, well suited for this age of exaggeration. Sophie and Jack Portnoy are pop Jewish parents; the Monkey is the apotheosis of the contemporary Id Girl; and Portnoy embodies not only the tics of a man trying to disentangle himself from his background, but also the latent fear of the liberal humanist that he may find himself out. It is no small concern to the Assistant Commissioner of Human Opportunity, champion of the underprivileged, that the human opportunities he really cares about wear skirts.

Can we get Philip Roth on Larry King or something?

Update: I guess I should take a second to say what I think of the news itself... Tragic is about the only word that comes to mind. The guy had a ton of potential, and, in my mind, all this proves is that he's human. Unfortunately, I don't see how he survives. Too much of Spitzer's appeal was based on his reputation for integrity.

His only hope politically is that, as my colleague John Judis suggests, he turns out to have been the target of some sort of Republican witch hunt--maybe all those GOP contributors from New York demanded his scalp. (See this piece for the slightly dubious story of how the investigation came about.) But, even if that were true, turning this into a partisan fight would get ugly very quickly. I suspect there'd still be enormous pressure on him to resign.

Update II: A commenter points out that going to a prostitute is not exactly a "deviant urge," just one a lot of men repress. Fair enough. Though there is this weird subplot:

When she called Ms. Lewis, they discussed the client’s reputation as a “difficult” man who sometimes asked the prostitutes “to do things you might not think were safe,” Ms. Lewis said. But Kristen, according to court papers, was prepared: “I have a way of dealing with that,” she is quoted as having told Ms. Lewis.

And, with that, I'm going to try my hardest not to write about anything else potentially kinky...

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:06 AM with 43 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

ChanRobt said:

Yes, that's it Noam.  Those diabolical Repugs bought Eliot a $4,000 hooker.  And then just waited, rubbing their hands together with glee, until he took the bait.

But, tell you what.  If it was zealous GOP prosecutors who got him, we'll let The Spritz off the hook.  But, you'll also have to release all the people The Spritz nailed with his years of self-serving zealotry.

March 11, 2008 3:16 AM

teplukhin2you said:

Talk about dated... that Time riff reads like something from another planet. How can anyone be repressed these days? Whatever Spitzer's hang-ups are, I seriously doubt that they have anything to do with repression or jewish guilt or any of the other freudian baggage that makes _Portnoy_ seem like it was written not 50 but 150 years ago.

My guess is that MollySimon's right, that the man's odd and "unsafe" predilection had to do with S/M, probably M. The "steamroller" guv is obviously into power games, has a weird fascination with roles involving domination and humiliation, plus an obsessive tendency.

Not really all that complicated, or interesting for that matter. Pity his wife and kids.

March 11, 2008 3:50 AM

epicciuto said:

If it was M, why would it be "not safe" for the prostitute? My guess is unprotected sex of some kind. Or S.

But reading this, like Tep, I'm so glad that Fruedian BS has fallen into disapproval.

March 11, 2008 6:03 AM

psantillana said:

I don't know any Freudian anything. But it always seems like the most rabid moral chest pounders that end up with the secret vice. Like Ted Haggard and William Bennett, to name two off the top of my head. Oh yeah Roy Cohn. Or am I thinking of J. Edgar Hoover? Or both? Anyway the fact that Spitzer made a point of grandstanding against prostitution fits the cliche perfectly. Actually this reminds me of Reverend Dimmesdale from The Scarlet Letter. I didn't read P's Complaint.

March 11, 2008 7:41 AM

jblum8156 said:

Yes, well, I met Spitzer's mother once. He and I were both called up for jury duty (this was in the 60s) and she came to court to explain why her boy couldn't be there that day (it didn't involve prostitutes as far as I could tell). She seemed like a very nice lady and she certainly  spoke well of her boy.

March 11, 2008 8:27 AM

aeromonas said:

I dunno about the Portnoy analogy.  Seems to me all you've got is Spitzer's Jewishness and the fact that he seems to have been under some compulsion to seek out mildly transgressive sex.  But who says he's wracked with guilt and castration anxiety?  And who says his desire to fuck some 105lb hottie interacts in any way with his Jewishness?  Sure, in his presser he SAID he felt guilty and ashamed, but that's only what he had to say as a practical necessity.  

As an aside, I now live in Australia where prostitution is legal in licensed brothels.  It is also the case that I have married into a mostly non-observant orthodox Jewish Australian family.  East St Kilda, where I spend a lot of time, is like the Crown Heights of Melbourne with black hats and peyes everywhere you look.  Now I can't confirm this independently, but it is said by my non-Hasidic relatives that Hasidic men can often be found in the brothels.  Sex with a goyisher pro is apparently no big deal.  Put the id in yid, indeed.  

March 11, 2008 8:37 AM

aeromonas said:

epiccuto, I agree.  And when I read the prostitute's response to the 'unsafe' warning, it sounded to me like he simply wanted straight sex, no condom.

And who can blame him?  As an doctor who treats patients with HIV, I've blown a lot of people a way, both patients and other professionals, with my acknowledgment that condoms are no fun at all.  That's not supposed to be part of the safe sex message.  You're supposed to say that its as good with a condom as without so why would anyone ever go bareback?   But it is quite simply false.  I'd rather gain my patients' trust with recognition of the truth, and then say, ''Look, sex is still pretty good even with a condom, and if you want to avoid sickness and death from HIV--or avoid inflicting those horrors on your partners--then you're stuck with the latex.  Make the best of it.''

March 11, 2008 8:50 AM

Wandreycer1 said:

aero - you made me laugh so hard I almost fell off my chair.

I agree that the most self-righteous among us are usually the biggest freaks in secret, projection is the most reliable crutch there is.  It just seems so odd coming from Spitzer because he happens to be incredibly smart, usualy these public sex scolds are such morons.

March 11, 2008 8:57 AM

aeromonas said:

I'm ashamed of myself.

I said, 'Who can blame Spitzer for wanting to dispense with the condom?'

While everything I said after that is true, the fact is that if Spitzer makes a habit of having unprotected sex with women who have sex for money, he's a selfish idiot, placing not only his own health but the health of his wife at risk.  That's assuming he has sex with his wife, of course.

March 11, 2008 9:01 AM

drozenson said:

I can jst imagine the role playing: ""You're a bright young securities analyst and I'm an unscrupulous but irresistably charming investment banker…."

March 11, 2008 9:18 AM

alexlevy said:

Going to a prostitue  a "deviant urge?"  You gotta be kidding, Noah. Either you are a child or an Ivy League graduate.  If tusing prostitutes wasn't so normal protitution would have been abolished a long time ago.  Not having that "ugrge," may be deviant.  But, no, it is a perfectly normal "urge," and for what I know it  probably serves a useful social purpose.  What is funny and wonderful about Spitzer getting caught in all this is that he was a prominent face among the "unco guid."  Nice to see hypocrisy snagged!  The great god Pan has his revenge!

Alex

March 11, 2008 10:39 AM

Bukharin said:

As an astute prosecutor Spitzer took on more than one brothel.  Alas, it appears now he was only negotiating.

March 11, 2008 11:08 AM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

coupla things...

Spitzer (who I think fairly resembles a trim gargoyle) did make a decision to forgo the girlfriend - thus not getting emotionally  involved with another woman which, if Mrs. Spitzer is like most women I know, may save his ass in the actuall marriage dept. - and rolled the dice by getting involved with the professional angle of that game. Okay, if he was your typical male, I would say...none of my business.  Between the horny gargoyle and his wife...

But as some have noted, he is a public figure, a Democrat (which means that getting strange is okay for GOPers like Vitter and Wide Stance but not for up and comers like Spitzer), and someone whose career was built on the perception of integrity. And the way he pursued it was so incredibly stupid. Any high profile Democrat with national aspiration HAS to know that his days of trolling for strange are OVER. Dumb mother f-er.  Deserves to be booted out of Albany and he is going to be in the doghouse with the wife and daughters. All he can say is that these women really meant nothing more to him than sex and hope that his wife is williing to give his sorry gargoyle ass another chance.

March 11, 2008 11:36 AM

williamyard said:

...oh yeah, baby. Ooo, yes. That's it--don't stop!  Um...oooo, oh baby--oh slow down... yeah...oh, yeah...shit, that's good [giggles]... ah!...a little faster...don't stop...don't stop...oh, oh, oh, ye-ye-yeah, yes, yes, yes!...Ooo!....I'm...yeah yeah... I'm gonna...oooooo..YES!...Oh!...Oh!...Oh!...Oh, yes!...Oooo... Oh!...Mmmm, yeah--oh baby, oh...yeah.....mmmmm......... ah. Wow.

Holy shit.

You're the best.

Oh, yeah.

Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, baby, no evil at all.

I'm the luckiest man alive.

[sighs]

You gotta go, huh?  Don't forget the envelope--there's a little something extra.

Next week, same time?

Wait...one more thing...

Thank you.

March 11, 2008 12:24 PM

selish70 said:

Tragic?  Tragic?  That's a good one.  Most of the people that he "serves" will be damned glad to be rid of this spoiled brat.  He had no idea why he wanted to be governor , none, except that the job was open, it was a promotion, and he could make vague promises about cleaning up the joint or whatever nonsense it was.  He's long gotten a pass for his hypocrisy in funding and other matters, but, oops, this one was just too much fun to ignore.

As for first Jewish President, probably a good miss for Jews.

March 11, 2008 12:38 PM

marcellusw101 said:

I'll leave it to others to decide whether prostitution is "deviant." That said, I'm pretty sure that committing serial adultery with multiple anonymous sex partners qualifies, whether you're paying for it or not.

March 11, 2008 1:01 PM

spencer97m said:

Should be we be expecting a statement from the Clinton campaign saying that Governor Spitzer's wife should step in for her husband when he resigns?  Surely they must think Mrs. Spitzer would be qualified on Day One.

March 11, 2008 1:42 PM

ChanRobt said:

Actually, the literary precursor of this was Somerset Maugham's "Rain".  Made into a pretty good movie, "Miss Saide Thomson" in 1953 starring Rita Hayworth.

In it, a zealous missionary on a South Pacific isle condemns Sadie, whom he suspects is a prostitute on the lam from Honolulu.  He, offers, however to give her a reprieve from exile if he allows him to guide her in her reform and redemption.

Of course, he ends up hitting on her big time, and the ensuing scandal brings his downfall.

This Spitzer thing is so wonderfully literary.

March 11, 2008 1:44 PM

blackton said:

Cancer is tragic, getting killed by random violence or a roadside bomb is tragic, a miscarriage at 5 months is tragic, getting caught paying 4 grand for a prostitute, that is just farce. (and for people like Noam, priceless)

March 11, 2008 1:49 PM

ChanRobt said:

Also, Noam, let me second or third or fourth the deserved razzing you rare getting for the knee jerk use of the word "tragic" in this case.

"Tragic" is when someone great and worthy falls because of one fatal flaw.

Spitzer is neither great nor worthy.  Smart, ambitious, and talented at his particular game.  Sure.  But, he was a self-serving son of a bitch.  And all his crusading was purely about building a career on the bodies of others.  

I'm sure some he zapped were not wonderful fellows.  But, he bent and distorted the law in many cases to make it happen.  

Spitzer was an ends justifies the means abuser of the highest order.  That he is getting his and in this way is not tragic.  It is poetic justice.

March 11, 2008 1:49 PM

ChanRobt said:

The sentence above obviously should have read, "...He, offers, however to give her a reprieve from exile if SHE allows him to guide her in her reform and redemption."

March 11, 2008 1:52 PM

JosephCuomo said:

This excerpt from Crain's seems to confirm what my source said last night (and which I posted last night on the "Bad Day for Capitalism?" thread at the Stump), that Spitzer is using his governorship as a bargaining chip, dealing his way out of office, in return for leniency from the law:

". . .aides to the governor expect him to step down, the New York Times is reporting this morning on its Web site. The only question is when he will do so, not if. It is expected that the resignation will be negotiated with federal prosecutors in an agreement to resolve their criminal investigation of the governor.

"The timing is uncertain because the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District is considering a variety of different charges, the most serious of which pertains to the governor’s alleged attempt to conceal his payments to a costly call-girl service."

March 11, 2008 2:01 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Great catch, JoeCo. TalkBackers strike again.

For the life of me I don't understand why CanWest doesn't recognize the asset value of TNR TalkBackers' insight. Privded gratis, and zero ads served, upsells, pagerank manipulations etc.

March 11, 2008 2:45 PM

jacksondyer said:

"Can we get Philip Roth on Larry King or something? "

What a silly question. You don't know much about Roth the writer, do you?

As for Spitzer ebing like Portnoy I don't think you uderstood Roth novella if you think so.

The one person Spitzer reminds me of is Giuliani who is not a fictional character. For comparisons to fictional characters try Tartuffe.

March 11, 2008 3:07 PM

JosephCuomo said:

Thanks for the kind words, tep.

March 11, 2008 3:14 PM

ChanRobt said:

JosephCuomo, I don't get why the governorship is a bargaining chip for Spitzer.

Say he insists on staying in office.  So, the Fed prosecute him on several counts, including the Mann Act, "structuring" (the way he tried to hid the source and recipient of his funds is illegal), plus a bunch of other stuff.

Spitzer continues to sit in Albany, under indictment and awaiting trial.  

You don't think the hew and cry and pressure, including from his own party will be unbearable?  In the middle of a presidential election year, the third or fourth most prominent Democrat is under the media microscope in a lurid trial.  

You think Spritzer can sit through that?  And that he won't give a damn about the effect on his wife and three girls?

I don't think he has any damn leverage at all.  To be political about it, why would the Justice Department in a Republican administration care that a major Democratic governor is sitting festering and stinking in office for months?

March 11, 2008 3:27 PM

JosephCuomo said:

ChanRobt-

My guess is that Spitzer is bargaining now with prosecutors: for the charges to be reduced (or dropped, he might hope)--in order to preempt a trial, or, at the very least, to diminish the severity of the rap he'll face--in exchange for him resigning from his position as governor.

March 11, 2008 3:42 PM

JosephCuomo said:

ChanRobt-

This sentence from the story in Crain's seems to suggest exactly what I suggested to you in my most recent post:

"It is expected that the resignation will be negotiated with federal prosecutors in an agreement to resolve their criminal investigation of the governor."

March 11, 2008 3:53 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Does the governor's office, as an institution, have some leverage over the prosecutors?

March 11, 2008 3:55 PM

Bukharin said:

JosephCuomo said:

ChanRobt-

This sentence from the story in Crain's seems to suggest exactly what I suggested to you in my most recent post:

"It is expected that the resignation will be negotiated with federal prosecutors in an agreement to resolve their criminal investigation of the governor."

Which seemingly, without any doubt, suggests the said prosecutors must be Republicans?????

March 11, 2008 4:27 PM

ChanRobt said:

I hope it's not bad form to repeat the same basic question on two threads, JosephC, but I still don't see what leverage Spitzer has over the Feds by hanging onto office.

What do they care if he screws up New York and screws New York Democrats?  Which is mainly what he'll be doing.  

In fact, he'll possibly be screwing the national Democrats with a protracted lurid distraction (much better for most of the population than a homosexual thing.  This ones got great looking babes.)

The longer Spitzer stays in, the worse it is for his family.  And the more pressure he'll come under from his own party.  

I just don't see that he has any leverage at all in Albany, JoeC.  Give me the logic trail here.  Why should Fed prosecutors care that he grips the governor's seat?  If he were president, then I get it.

March 11, 2008 8:29 PM

aeromonas said:

From the NY Times:

"The official said the discussions were likely to focus not on prostitution, but on how it was paid for: Whether the payments from Mr. Spitzer to the service were made in a way to conceal their purpose and source. That could amount to a crime called structuring, which carries a penalty of up to five years in prison."

I must admit, I don't get it.  Am I supposed to understand that I'm required by law to leave some unambiguous record of how I spend every bit of my money?  Sure, if I pay cash for an item or a service the seller is under some obligation to keep a record of the sale for purposes of taxation, but I don't see that that the seller is under any obligation to record from whom the payment was received or that I'm required to record the outlay.

Does this mean that if I take a thousand bucks out of the ATM and spend it on cocaine and hookers I'm guilty of the crime of "structuring" in addition to the crimes of drug possession and solicitation?  If so, how then am I not also guilty of "structuring" if I spend the cash on a new surf board or a trampoline for my kids?

March 11, 2008 8:37 PM

ChanRobt said:

aeromonas, if Spitzer gets sent up under a tortured technicality, as "structured" money may be, then it will be poetic justice.

He twisted laws left and write to nail his prey during his self-serving prosecutorial career.

I believe the point of "structuring" is to stop the laundering of money and using wire transfers (which may also be interstate commerce) from being used by organized crime and drug dealers, etc.

You make good points.  But, there are a lot of laws on the books designed to go after bigtime crime that have been used in unintended ways against individuals and "little guys".

Spitzer would deserve to be so screwed.  Others wouldn't and don't.

March 11, 2008 8:56 PM

norval13 said:

Even if Spitzer stays in office until his term ends (unlikely--12 Democrats good and true will put an end to that, just like in MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS), he will have the punishment of having everyone know that he blew $80,000 bucks on hookers, who regarded him as a "difficult" customer who could nonetheless be put in his place.  I mean, not even Larry Craig was paying for it . . .

March 11, 2008 9:45 PM

Emdashes said:

I've seen three blogs mention a piece of writing in connection with Eliot Spitzer's stunning predicament, and two of them appeared in The New Yorker. To start, Garth Risk Hallberg at the Millions returns to Nick Paumgarten's fine profile of the governor

March 11, 2008 10:53 PM

JosephCuomo said:

ChanRobt-

I think you're missing an something obvious here, my friend: any prosecutor (or any law enforement officer) would most probably see it as a huge feather in their cap if they were able to bring down a sitting governnor. (Think of the rewards for those involved, the fame, the distinction on their resume: that they were the one that had toppled the governor of NY.)

Which is to say, if Spitzer gets the deal he wants from the feds (and/or other prosecutors), the fact that he may be willing to give up his position as governor in return for said (lenient) deal is a great validation (as well as a great career move) for those prosecuting him.

March 12, 2008 12:07 AM

JosephCuomo said:

ChanRobt-

You've posted a question to me on another thread, regarding my most recent post above. So I'll answer you here (as well as on that other thread).

I think we may be talking across points, ChanRobt. What I'm saying is that Spitzer sees the governorship as a bargaining chip, to help him negotiate with prosecutors (a fact confirmed by the Crain's story).

The prosecutors, on the other hand, may be waging their own counter-offensive, such as leaking further, lurid details of the case to the press, in the hopes that it further embarrasses Spitzer, and creates further public pressure to force his resignation.

The result, thus far: a stalemate. The governor hasn't yet resigned.

Which side prevails in this struggle--the prosecutors or the governor--will be determined by factors that aren't all that visible to us on the outside (and virtually the entire nation is on the outside when it comes to these negotiations) right now.

All of which is to say, it's a chess game. And, for Spitzer, a terrible shit storm (I like Stephen Colbert's name for the scandal: Eliot Mess).

Either way, as you suggest, Spitzer is a loser. The question that remains is this: how much does the man lose--in addition to losing the governorship? Will there be a plea agreement, for instance? And if so, how severe will the charges be, the charges to which Spitzer pleads guilty?

If there is no plea agreement, and all of this goes to trial, Spitzer is, to put it mildly, fucked. And not in an appealing (at least to him) $1,000-an-hour way.

March 12, 2008 8:14 AM

jeanag said:

Spitzer out? Isn't the correct order: liquor, then spitzer? At least he wasn't with Crystal Mangum

March 12, 2008 9:03 AM

jeanag said:

Thanks to the "doctor" above at  1:50pm 3-11 who has "blown many people a way..." Dear Sir or Madam, how many ways are there?

March 12, 2008 9:09 AM

aeromonas said:

Hilarous, jeanag.  Or not.

But thanks for the correction.  I actually thought 'away' was two words 'a' and 'way.'  you've enlightened me.

And you're welcome to use the quotation marks when using the title by which people in my profession are usually referred, although they didn't put any such punctuation on my med school diploma.

March 12, 2008 9:22 AM

aeromonas said:

Oh, and jeanag, where are you over at the 'Race and the Election' thread?  I'd imagine a white supremacist troll such as yourself would have some choice comments to add to the discussion.

March 12, 2008 9:26 AM

jeanag said:

Even though he has resigned, "Emperor" Spitzer probably won't join ex NJ governor "Knees"  McGreavy, whose tell-all book explained how he trolled for sex in the men's rooms on the NJ Turnpike.

March 12, 2008 1:12 PM

lesserliz said:

How about Spitzer as Woody Allen in the "Orgasmatron"

March 12, 2008 2:50 PM

Double click this space to insert your ad.