TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.02.2008
Tie Goes to Obama

Both Hillary and Obama had good moments and bad tonight. None were indelible. Several times in this campaign I've felt like we saw status quo debates which didn't change a pro-Hillary dynamic. This time the status quo clearly helps Obama.

I'm not sure what to make of her little homily to Obama at the end there, which ended in a dramatic handshake. On the one hand I think Hillary is eager to dispel notions that she has run a mean and dirty campaign (she asserted earlier in the night that the campaign had been "positive"). On the other hand it did have a valedictory quality to it, the sentimental tone of a woman who senses the end may be near.

Update: A press release from Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson proclaims that last episode "the moment she retook the reins of this race." I'd say that's wishful thinking, but we'll see how the voters feel.

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:45 PM with 16 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

rishy said:

She conceded.  Her closing riff was a concession.

February 21, 2008 10:05 PM

helitzur1 said:

Her last answer was great, but at this point Obama is clearly too good for her to beat.  The "Xerox" line was obviously stupid, though her closing answer does indicate that she's more likely to go out on a unifying note than on a divisive one.

February 21, 2008 10:14 PM

Androscoggin said:

Her closing was the best I've seen from her.

February 21, 2008 10:21 PM

Hungarian Great Bela Tarr said:

Mr. Crowley:

Can you give us a bit more context on that Wolfson quote? It doesn't make sense. She retook the reins of the race by shaking hands with Obama? (Also, doesn't that interpretation sort of spoil the magnanimity of the moment? Wolfson makes it sound as though she only shook Obama's hand so that she could pick his pocket.)

PS: There was a minor typo in the Ambinder quote you just put up ("Is Barack Obama ready to be commander in chief? Clearly -- the answer, for Clinton, is 'yes.'"). What he meant to say, obviously, is that Hillary should explicitly make the argument that Obama isn't ready, not that he is ready.

February 21, 2008 10:27 PM

BHLnyc said:

There's really no question about it. It was a concession that her candidacy is nearing the end. For more than a year she has been emphatic -- obnoxiously so -- that she was going to prevail. This evening, just before that last minute handshake (which was gracious, to be fair), she used the words, "no matter what happens..." That was a ginormous concession on her part to the idea that she might lose and I think it was very telling.

February 21, 2008 10:35 PM

Michael Crowley said:

There's not a lot more to the Wolfson quote--here's the statement in its entirety:

What we saw in the final moments in that debate is why Hillary Clinton is the next President of the United States. Her strength, her life experience, her compassion. She's tested and ready. It was the moment she retook the reins of this race and showed women and men why she is the best choice.

February 21, 2008 11:16 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

I revise my statement of a week or two ago -- now it's Wolfson playing Aguirre on the raft, declaring that Hillary is queen of El Dorado to a bunch of monkeys...

February 21, 2008 11:46 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

Hungarian Great Bela Tarr,

I like your name.

February 21, 2008 11:47 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

(and pccostello's one of the monkeys)

February 21, 2008 11:51 PM

psantillana said:

I don't know, CFK, I always thought of the monkeys as not buying Aguirre's line. Maybe I'm projecting...

February 22, 2008 12:18 AM

Hungarian Great Bela Tarr said:

Likewise, CFK. (And the Herzog reference as well.)

February 22, 2008 2:27 AM

fwslusser said:

CFK: How many here (or anywhere) have actually seen Aguirre all the way to the end?

February 22, 2008 2:31 AM

mgrace1113 said:

Who is the real Hillary Clinton?  Is it possible for her to get real?  What I saw last night was a performance by a woman who either doesn't know her true self or, to be more kind, is led to play multiple roles provided by Mark and Mandy and all the high paid consultants.  I think the real Hillary came through when she defended her plans for healthcare with genuine passion.  At the end I saw a woman who's not comfortable with the mix of positions she's taken on Iraq and that fake line about change by Xerox.  Her last plea was to have the people see the caring person she really may be, but I think it's too late.  Obama wins the debate by emphasizing her lack of leadership in voting to authorize the war.  

February 22, 2008 8:35 AM

jamiepenkethma said:

I saw Aguirre to the end, can't say that about the debate.

February 22, 2008 10:28 AM

Daily Intelligencer - New York Magazine said:

The pundits seemingly had Hillary Clinton’s plan all mapped out before last night’s debate. She has to go for the jugular, they said. This is one of her last chances to knock Barack Obama down off his pedestal, they claimed. Well, besides

February 22, 2008 11:05 AM

daschaer said:

PS- what was the deal with her rambling on about wounded soldiers hobbling through the door? That sounded so fake and insincere.

February 22, 2008 12:58 PM