TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.01.2008
White Evangelicals for Obama?

I've suggested that one way for Obama to get a big boost out of South Carolina would be to exceed expectations among white voters. One way for Obama to do that might be to aggressively court white evangelicals, of which I'm guessing there are many in South Carolina. (How many will vote in Saturday's Democratic primary is another question, but they certainly exist...)

Obama himself is longtime churchgoer who talks a lot about the role of faith in politics. And, if you've followed some of his recent moves, it looks like he might be thinking the same thing. At Monday's debate in Myrtle Beach, for example, he offered the following reflection*:

I think there have been times -- there have been times where our Democratic Party did not reach out as aggressively as we could to evangelicals, for example, because the assumption was, well, they don't agree with us on choice, or they don't agree with us on gay rights, and so we just shouldn't show up.  And when you don't show up, if you're not going to church, then you're not talking to church folk. And that means that people have a very right-wing perspective in terms of what faith means and of defining our faith.

And as somebody who believes deeply in the precepts of Jesus Christ, particularly treating the least of these in a way that he would, that it is important for us to not concede that ground. Because I think we can go after those folks and get them.

Since then, Obama has given lengthy interviews to the Christian Broadcasting Network, Beliefnet, and Christianity Today.

Now, it's possible that Obama's just rebutting the scurrilous Muslim slur as efficiently as possible. But if, in the process, he can pick off some of the voters who believe Hillary's a godless liberal (despite her personal religiosity), I'm sure he'd take it.

If any of our readers actually lives in South Carolina and is aware of Obama campaign efforts to mobilize white evangelicals, by all means let me know and I'll post your comments.

*For what it's worth, this is the central argument of The Party Faithful, the forthcoming book by my fiancee, Amy Sullivan. If you have any interest in this topic, by all means click here.

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:47 AM with 7 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

spurious said:

Now I know this is an opinion journal, but Noam. . . .

Ah, forget it.

January 24, 2008 9:06 AM

Bukharin said:

Review:

"Senior Time editor Sullivan says 'trying to understand American politics without looking at religion would be like trying to understand the politics of the Middle East without paying attention to oil.' Her fresh look at the 'God gap' reveals the chasm's depths and offers a bridge across. Sullivan, an evangelical, discusses party process as the Catholic and white evangelical vote for Democrats declined sharply in the 1980s. The story of this shift is as fascinating as it is timely. Starting in the 1960s, she traces the Second Vatican Council's impact on Catholics and the rise of Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority, and the effects of these changes upon politics. Sullivan focuses with special sharpness on John Kerry, 'a case study in how to mishandle religion during a political race' and challenges the conventional wisdom 'that the right was religious and the left wanted religion scrubbed from the public square.' Evangelical and political conservatives may be related, but they are not synonymous, says Sullivan; Clinton, after all, is 'a genuine Southern evangelical.' Sullivan's account argues persuasively and optimistically that 'politically liberal and theologically orthodox' evangelicals can be brought back to the Democratic Party. Must reading for Democrats." Publishers Weekly (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.)

Must reading for Democrats!

And Mr. Scheiber, Ms. Sullivan is an Irish girl.  Excellent choice!

January 24, 2008 9:30 AM

drdannyu said:

It has to be better than the vapid, self-congratulatory "God's Politics" by Jim Wallis.

January 24, 2008 9:54 AM

virginiacentrist said:

Most of Obama's upper christ rich white supporters don't believe in Jeebus. So if he can build on that, it would be great.

January 24, 2008 10:18 AM

ralphnelle said:

Well, for what it's worth, his speech at MLK's church, which presents the meaning of his campaign in terms of Biblical metaphors, has been watched about 500k times since Monday.

January 24, 2008 10:40 AM

jet said:

Congrats on your engagement Noam (late as it may be).

I'm always good for a read of Amy's work when she posts on Slate.  Obviously finishing the book would have limited that over that past year and a half or so, but I've enjoyed her writings when she was posting regularly..

January 24, 2008 11:17 AM

jet said:

Meant to ad Slate et al. to my congrats post.

January 24, 2008 11:20 AM