TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM
July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.01.2008
Michelle Obama Gets Down to Brass Tacks

For those who've long believed that Obama's best chance of winning was to frame the race as a choice between the future and what you didn't like about the '90s--well, it looks like the Obama campaign has come around to your view. Here's a fundraising e-mail they sent out just now under Michelle Obama's name:

In the past week or two, another candidate's spouse has been getting an awful lot of attention.

We knew getting into this race that Barack would be competing with Senator Clinton and President Clinton at the same time.

We expected that Bill Clinton would tout his record from the nineties and talk about Hillary's role in his past success. That's a fair approach and a challenge we are prepared to face.

What we didn't expect, at least not from our fellow Democrats, are the win-at-all-costs tactics we've seen recently. We didn't expect misleading accusations that willfully distort Barack's record.

Barack Obama isn't relying on a former President of the United States to campaign for him.

He's relying on us -- you, me, and hundreds of thousands of people like us who are giving whatever they can afford to support this movement. ...

Barack's unwavering opposition to the war in Iraq, his outspoken support of women's rights, and his call for leadership that will transform our party and our country have all been mischaracterized in the past two weeks.

We've seen disingenuous attacks and smear tactics turn people off from the political process for too long, and enough is enough.

It's time for a change. It's time for a new kind of leadership and a new kind of politics in our party and in our country.

Wow.

The Clinton campaign is holding a conference call this afternoon to respond to this stuff (I think). I'll keep you posted on what they say.

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:19 PM with 11 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

dbhuff said:

"She'll say anything, change nothing", yep, payback is a bitch.  NOW you've pulled one dishonest add huh Hill?

January 24, 2008 3:51 PM

Gavriel Meir-Levi said:

Ata girl Michelle!  Your husband has my vote and your supportive voice is a welcome change from the shrill and rather dysfunctional spousal dynamics of some other democratic candidates, and I am certainly not referring to the Edwards family.

January 24, 2008 3:52 PM

mschol17 said:

Zing!

January 24, 2008 3:55 PM

Rhubarbs said:

The Onion reports, "Bill Clinton: 'Screw It, I'm Running For President'"

www.theonion.com/.../bill_clinton_screw_it_im_running

January 24, 2008 4:01 PM

miceelf said:

Good!!! I like Mrs. Obama's style. Too bad she's married. :-)

January 24, 2008 4:01 PM

stgla said:

Sorry, I like my candidates' spouses to be red-faced and sputtering.  About time someone linked to that Onion article.  Thanks, Rhubarbs

January 24, 2008 4:37 PM

The Plank said:

Ben Smith asks , "There's a fair amount of chatter today about whether Bill Clinton has gone

January 24, 2008 4:38 PM

Androscoggin said:

Go get 'em, Michelle.

January 24, 2008 4:44 PM

cspencef said:

Wasn't this virtually inevitable?  "See, this is exactly the kind of thing we need to change, so vote for my husband."  

January 24, 2008 5:14 PM

amarshll said:

Unwavering opposition to the war, except when he voted for Condoleeza Rice for Secretary of State.  Then, he supported the war . . . but only a little bit, I guess.  Oh, and voting to re-authorize the Patriot Act.  He's kind of supporting the "war on terror" there too . . . but just a little bit.

And no, I'm not a Hilary supporter.  So don't bother telling me about HRC's war-mongering.  I'm just saying that Obama hasn't offered his consituents in Illinois "unwavering opposition to the war" -- we get that from our other senator.

He isn't a saint, and he won't bring us change.  All he'll bring us is a repackaged version of the triangulation that we liberals hated in the Clinton administration.

January 24, 2008 5:15 PM

lymon1 said:

"We knew getting into this race that Barack would be competing with Senator Clinton and President Clinton at the same time."

Does that mean Barack's exchange with Hillary about this at the debate was a lie?  He -seemed- so surprised!

January 24, 2008 5:16 PM