TNR BLOGS

December 01, 2008 | 5:30 PM
December 01, 2008 | 4:40 PM
December 01, 2008 | 2:02 PM

December 01, 2008 | 6:39 PM
December 01, 2008 | 6:31 PM
December 01, 2008 | 6:16 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

December 01, 2008 | 6:03 PM
December 01, 2008 | 4:08 PM
December 01, 2008 | 1:36 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
11.12.2007
Rapid Response

At 12:58 pm today I got an email from the Obama campaign announcing a 2 pm conference call to unveil a "major endorsement" (which turns out to be anti-war New Hampshire freshman Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter.)

At 1:42 pm the Clinton campaign emailed announcing that--gee, what a coincidence!--it would stage its own 2 pm conference call, this one featuring Senator Evan Bayh and Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, "to discuss why Hillary Clinton's [sic] is the most electable Democrat."

Seems the Clinton people put their own call together so fast they couldn't avoid a typo--just a sign of how competitive things have become.

Update: The Obama campaign is also holding its own 3pm electability conference call. At this point I don't know which call is responding to which....

More: Clever spin by Clinton spokesman Phil Singer on his campaign's call. One reporter asked for response to this CNN/Opinion Research poll showing that only John Edwards beats each of the top four Republican contenders. Singer's response was to cite today's CBS-New York Times poll, which shows that Democrats overwhelmingly see Hillary as their most electable candidate. But that's just the opinion of Democrats. It doesn't mean that Hillary actually is the most electable, of course. Verdict: Totally unconvincing!

(In fact, lots of polling makes all the Democratic candidates look like head-to-head winners right now. Yet an important but oft-neglected fact is how every one of those leading Democrats badly underperfom the "generic" Democrat against the GOP. So the notion of "electability" is somewhat relative here.)

--Michael Crowley

Posted: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:04 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

virginiacentrist said:

Something big is brewing for Obama...

Intrade:

Obama +6 in IA

Obama +15 in NH

Obama + 10 in SC

RE: the endorsements of Shea-Porter and Hodes from NH...

Keep in mind that these are both FRESHMEN congresspeople. That means two things:

1. They don't have entrenched control over party establishment mechanisms (not sure what those are anyway)

HOWEVER

2. They RECENTLY ran a competitive race. That means they have tons of volunteers and supporters whose level of passion and commitment to these politicians is at a fever pitch...

December 11, 2007 2:32 PM

stgla said:

Where you have the word [sic] I think you need to insert the omitted word, "husband."

December 11, 2007 2:47 PM

ralphnelle said:

I don't understand why it is not more relevant that during the Clinton years we lost six senate seats, almost 50 house seats, and 9 governorships. And that was BILL. Imagine what Hillary will do to us.

She is the democratic catastrophe that the GOP has been dreaming of for years.

December 11, 2007 3:07 PM

wgcreeley said:

lol @ stgla!

December 11, 2007 3:10 PM

drdannyu said:

stgla, that was frigging brilliant.

December 11, 2007 3:24 PM

blackton said:

yeah stgla, great one

December 11, 2007 5:29 PM