TNR BLOGS

December 01, 2008 | 5:30 PM
December 01, 2008 | 4:40 PM
December 01, 2008 | 2:02 PM

December 01, 2008 | 7:09 PM
December 01, 2008 | 6:39 PM
December 01, 2008 | 6:31 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

December 01, 2008 | 6:03 PM
December 01, 2008 | 4:08 PM
December 01, 2008 | 1:36 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
04.12.2007
From Nixon to Hillary

A reminder that this isn't the first campaign debate over how much "experience" a secondary player acquired in the White House. And needless to say, it was the "inexperienced" upstart who won this battle.

 

--Michael Crowley 

Posted: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 5:00 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

virginiacentrist said:

Obama is (reportedly) up to 10,917 contributors in about 28 hours...the campaign asked for $25 per person, and the online form makes it harder to give less. Let's assume that those donations average about $40 a piece. That's almost a half a million dollars based on an online appeal that cost the campaign about $1000 (staff time) to write...

This is the value of having a huge contributor base of small donors who haven't maxed out...

When most of your contributor base is maxed out big wigs, you don't have much room for this kind of growth...

Will the media pick this up? A perfect storm for Obama would be the following:

1. The media covers the fact that Hillary is going negative (but not her actual attacks).

2. They then cover Obama's huge fundraising pull from tons of tiny donors

or....

3. They cover the highly scandalous story about overzealous volunteers debating people over the phone.

December 4, 2007 5:23 PM

sprechs said:

talk about defining "inexperience" down--JFK had been a Representative and Senator for 14 years when he ran for president, a bit more than Obama's three.

December 4, 2007 6:38 PM

The Ignorant Populist said:

More of these clips Mike. Great contrast.

Jesus! I mean Ike didn't really do Nixon any favours, did he? And "as the decider", did I really hear that?!

December 4, 2007 6:54 PM

Michael Crowley said:

fair point, sprechs, i'll add quotes around the word

December 4, 2007 7:18 PM

virginiacentrist said:

This commercial was featured on "Mad Men"  as well...

December 4, 2007 8:03 PM

virginiacentrist said:

After sustaining some rather mild attacks from fellow Dems and some minor jabs from Republicans, Hillary's unfavorable numbers hit 50% again, for a net favorability rating of -3%

www.usatoday.com/.../2007-12-03-politics-poll.htm

Also interesting - Rudy has dropped from a net favorability rating of +65% a year ago to a rating of +15%

Mccain has gone from +5% in June to +25% now...

December 4, 2007 10:09 PM