TNR BLOGS

July 24, 2008 | 6:54 PM
July 24, 2008 | 6:53 PM
July 24, 2008 | 6:53 PM

July 24, 2008 | 6:37 PM
July 24, 2008 | 4:58 PM
July 24, 2008 | 2:31 PM

July 23, 2008 | 7:28 PM
July 23, 2008 | 7:06 PM
July 23, 2008 | 3:04 PM

July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
June 19, 2008 | 2:54 PM

July 23, 2008 | 1:31 PM
July 23, 2008 | 11:49 AM
July 22, 2008 | 8:06 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
05.11.2007
Parsing Obama's SNL Cameo

Just a quick thought about that Obama "Saturday Night Live" appearance you've no doubt seen by now. The obvious punchline is that Obama is comfortable enough in his own skin to show up to a Halloween party as himself, as opposed to Hillary, who is constantly rooting around for a winning persona. "I'm not going to change who I am just because it's Halloween," Obama says. But there's another interpretation of the sketch that's less flattering to Obama: That he's so self-absorbed it didn't occur to him to come as anyone other than himself. There's already a low-grade chatter among journalists about how Obama is a little egotistical, that he's never more engaged than when reflecting on his own identity or his own achievements, that his campaign is one big exercise in navel-gazing. (See, for example, here.) I wonder: Was the SNL sketch intended as a kind of inside joke--Obama's way of making fun of these tendencies? Or is he so oblivious to them he didn't realize the joke could be interpreted that way? Knowing what I know about Obama, I suspect it's the former. But who knows?

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:41 AM with 5 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

stgla said:

"low-grade chatter among journalists" -- who exactly is being self-absorbed here?  

Low-grade, indeed.

November 5, 2007 1:35 PM

blackton said:

could it possibly be that the SNL writers wrote it the way it was because they thought it was funny? And that putting a real Obama in a costume would have meant there would have been no joke?

November 5, 2007 1:49 PM

drdannyu said:

An egotistical presidential candidate?  Ye GODS!

November 5, 2007 2:47 PM

ralphnelle said:

Yet another piece of evidence to support the idea that political journalism should not be a full time job: it leads to extreme ADD (you can't say anything interesting if you have to cover the same stump speeches each day), which in turn leads to trivial and unimportant gossip about gossip. Well done.

November 5, 2007 3:23 PM

ralphnelle said:

Noam, my apologies for the cheap shot here. My post says more about my current frustrations with this race than anything else. For what it is worth (if anything!), I consistently enjoy your sober and insightful analysis. The same goes for Crowley.

November 5, 2007 4:17 PM

Double click this space to insert your ad.