TNR BLOGS

January 07, 2009 | 6:03 PM
January 07, 2009 | 5:47 PM
January 07, 2009 | 5:11 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 07, 2009 | 12:40 PM
January 04, 2009 | 8:54 PM
January 01, 2009 | 8:57 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 07, 2009 | 5:09 PM
January 07, 2009 | 3:00 PM
January 07, 2009 | 1:51 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
19.11.2008
No, The Message Is Not From Osama Bin Laden. It's From His Deputy To Barack Obama

Al-Qaeda Deputy Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri in Message on Islamist Websites:

"Barack Obama has won the presidency of the United States of America, and on this occasion, I would like to send several messages.
  
"First, a message of congratulations to the Muslim Ummah on the American people's admission of defeat in Iraq. Although the evidence of America's defeat in Iraq appeared years ago, Bush and his administration continued to be stubborn and deny the brilliant midday sun. If Bush has achieved anything, it is in his transfer of America's disaster and predicament to his successor. But the American people, by electing Obama, declared its anxiety and apprehension about the future towards which the policy of the likes of Bush is leading it, and so it decided to support someone calling for withdrawal from Iraq."

Read the rest here

Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:30 PM with 7 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

jacksondyer said:

Attacks by Al-Qaeda Deputy Leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri can only help Obama politically.

November 20, 2008 3:17 PM

iambiguous said:

Let's face it, the one thing those who either love or loathe Osama bin Laden share in common is the intractable belief that there is only one absolutely unimpeachable narrative about the other.

And [sigh] all too often they possess authortarian personalities and are staunchly convinced the only way to move forward is by embracing their own rendition of The Way.

I think if I could sit down with Osama bin Laden and explain to him why he thinks he is who he thinks he is is merely a manifestation of what Heidegger called "dasein" he might learn just enough to deconstruct himself.

On the other hand, Martin Heidegger took to defending the path Hitler's dasein chose; so there are no guarentees.

But you'd be surprised at just how few people there are who really understand the fortuitous manner in which they become who they think they are.

And how, in one circumstanial landslide, that can all change.

george walton

November 20, 2008 9:52 PM

jacksondyer said:

Sorry, iambiguous, you are not ambiguous, you are deluded.

"I think if I could sit down with Osama bin Laden and explain to him why he thinks he is who he thinks he is is merely a manifestation of what Heidegger called "dasein" he might learn just enough to deconstruct himself."

I think you better stay home, you may keep your head a bit longer that way.

On the other hand, you probably lost you mind already.

btw: fyi, Hiedeggerain daseiin and Adorno's authoritarian personality don't meld very easily.

On the other hand, Heidegger  had an authoritarian personality too.

I recommend you read The Jargon of Authenticity. It's all about Dasein.

November 21, 2008 12:09 AM

jacksondyer said:

btw: Iambiguous,

Your idea of converting Bin Laden reminds me of Ramon Llull's efforts.  

November 21, 2008 11:50 AM

iambiguous said:

Jackson writes:

Sorry, iambiguous, you are not ambiguous, you are deluded.

"I think if I could sit down with Osama bin Laden and explain to him why he thinks he is who he thinks he is is merely a manifestation of what Heidegger called "dasein" he might learn just enough to deconstruct himself."

I think you better stay home, you may keep your head a bit longer that way.

On the other hand, you probably lost you mind already.

btw: fyi, Hiedeggerain daseiin and Adorno's authoritarian personality don't meld very easily.

On the other hand, Heidegger had an authoritarian personality too.

I recommend you read The Jargon of Authenticity. It's all about Dasein.

George:

Deluded? Gosh, that sounds an awful lot like an ad hominem, to me. And, as Hillary Clinton once put it, "that hurts my feelings".

He said, ironically.

But, okay, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time.

So, what in your view is the difference between first person omniscient [authoritarian] personalities except the jargon they use to propose and to propagate The Way?

Their own, more likely than not.

But let's probe "dasein" more fully.

Please tell me how you understand this existential construct as it relates to actual human social, political and economic interaction. What does it mean to have an "identity"? How do factors like contingency, chance and change come into play as you grow older? What was Heidegger's point with respect to being "thrown" at birth into an adventitious cultural and historical stew? How do being and nothingness [living and dying] intertwine for "I" in a world without God?  What are the epistemological parameters respecting what we either can or cannot know about "self"?

george

November 21, 2008 3:34 PM

jacksondyer said:

iambiguous, I ma not interested in your simple minded philosophizing.

Did you have trouble getting a teaching job? Is that why you are trying to play philosophy teacher here?

November 22, 2008 12:23 AM

iambiguous said:

Jackson writes:

iambiguous, I ma not interested in your simple minded philosophizing.

Did you have trouble getting a teaching job? Is that why you are trying to play philosophy teacher here?

George:

In the political philosophy rooms I hang out in that sort of reaction is a dead giveaway that someone knows he is in way over his head.

If, on the other hand, you think it might be the other way around, why not show everyone in the here just how simple-minded my philosophy is.

Let's discuss the relationship between Adorno's conjectures regarding the multi-level self and the manner in which it conflates and/or conflicts with Heidegger's approach to subjectivity.

But not up in the stratosphere of abstraction, okay?.

Let's steer this inherently problematic philosophical exchange down closer to the ground. Let's explore the manner in which Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama approach religion from both a transcendental and a pragmatic vantage point.

Then we can embed these more instantiated speculations in a hypothetical thought experiment by imagaining Obama's reaction to Ayman Al-Zawahiri's take on his election victory and how that might play out down the road in Iraq.

george walton

November 22, 2008 1:52 AM

Double click this space to insert your ad.