TNR BLOGS

May 09, 2008 | 9:33 AM
May 08, 2008 | 8:55 PM
May 08, 2008 | 6:06 PM

May 09, 2008 | 10:15 AM
May 09, 2008 | 10:10 AM
May 09, 2008 | 12:12 AM

May 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
May 02, 2008 | 5:26 PM
May 02, 2008 | 2:40 PM

May 08, 2008 | 9:12 PM
May 08, 2008 | 3:26 PM
May 08, 2008 | 2:38 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.03.2008
Thoughts on Wright

I've just read Dayo Olopade's fascinating piece, "Far Wright," on Barack Obama's far-left preacher, Jeremiah Wright. It's an insightful piece, and it evoked memories of the two black churches I sometimes attended when I lived in Georgetown. But I'm no expert and Dayo is.

A good friend of mine, Morton Klein, who is president of the Zionist Organization of America, a post once held by none other than Louis Dembitz Brandeis, sent me his own impressions of Jeremiah Wright, impressions that contrast with what one might think after having heard Obama characterize his pastor. Now, Klein is not for Obama; and I am. But what Klein remembers about the Philadelphia in which he and Wright grew up is a contribution towards understanding this strange but apparently common type of preacher.

OBAMA'S PASTOR RAISED IN PRIVILEGE, NOT POVERTY

How do I know?

It happens that, as a Philadelphian, I attended Central High School – the same public school Jeremiah Wright attended from 1955 to 1959. He could have gone to an integrated neighborhood school, but he chose to go to Central, a virtually all-white school. Central is the second oldest public high school in the country, which attracts the most serious academic students in the city. The school then was about 80% Jewish and 95% white. The African-American students, like all the others, were there on merit. Generally speaking, we came from lower/middle class backgrounds. Many of our parents had not received a formal education and we tended to live in row houses. In short, economically, we were roughly on par.

I attended Central a few years after Rev. Wright, so I did not know him personally. But I knew of him and I know where he used to live – in a tree-lined neighborhood of large stone houses in the Germantown section of Philadelphia. This is a lovely neighborhood to this day. Moreover, Rev. Wright's father was a prominent pastor and his mother was a teacher and later vice-principal and disciplinarian of the Philadelphia High School for Girls, also a distinguished academic high school. Two of my acquaintances remember her as an intimidating and strict disciplinarian and excellent math teacher. In short, Rev. Wright had a comfortable upper-middle class upbringing. It was hardly the scene of poverty and indignity suggested by Senator Obama to explain what he calls Wright's anger and what I describe as his hatred.

In recent days, we have seen clips of several of Rev. Wright's sermons, showing him declaring "G-d Damn America," blaming America for intentionally creating the drug problem, for creating the AIDS virus, for supporting Israeli "state terrorism against Palestinians," for being responsible for causing 9-11, for being white supremacist and racist and for intentionally keeping people in poverty.

We have also learned that, last year, Rev. Wright's Church honored with a lifetime achievement award Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan, who has said that "Judaism is a gutter religion," that "Hitler was a very great man" and that "white people are potential humans, they haven't evolved yet." In fact, Rev. Wright accompanied Farrakhan in the 1980s on a visit to Muammar Gaddafi's Libya, which was then illegal under U.S. law. Nevertheless, the Church and Wright's successor as pastor, Rev. Otis Moss III, have issued a statement defending and praising Wright, while completely ignoring Wright's horrific statements.

Morton A. Klein is National President of the Zionist Organization of America.


Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:25 PM with 24 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

ratnerstar said:

Huh?

I skimmed through Obama's speech again and I didn't see any suggestion that Wright came from a particularly poor background.  Maybe I'm missing something since I didn't give it a really close reading.  But either way, did Klein stop to think that a black kid in the 40s and 50s *maybe* had problems and concerns other than his family's economic status?

March 24, 2008 12:44 PM

rebml said:

Mr. Obama has deceitfully hidden his anti-Israel bias. Why else would he remain a member of a church that proudly published a propaganda laced screed in July, 2007, written by Hamas terror leader Mousa Abu Marzook? Why else would he hire Robert Malley, Arafat apologist, as a mideast advisor? Why else would he have hired Samantha Powers, who endorsed Walt and Mearsheimer's blame AIPAC  slant on American foreign policy? Why else would he have told anti-Israel Arab American activist  Ali Abunimal, 'Hey, I’m sorry I haven’t said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I’m hoping when things calm down I can be more up front.' This account by Abunimah appears on the anti-Israel website Electronic Intifada.

Marty, you're sticking your head in the sand about this guy.

March 24, 2008 12:57 PM

basman said:

Okay, I have read this and my question, if you care to answer, is: what say you about these things?

March 24, 2008 12:57 PM

lymon1 said:

basman beat me to it: these are "thoughts on Wright" but not Marty's thoughts on Wright.  Or are they?  He won't say.  If I had to guess, it's "I agree with this, but not enough to take back my endorsement, but I'm planning on ditching Obama for McCain anyway so maybe I'll keep quiet for now and cite this as part of my reasoning later."

March 24, 2008 1:14 PM

achester99 said:

Ya, Marty, please explain, since those aren't your thoughts, they are Klein's.

Anyway, Klein is an offensive buffoon, and I wouldn't brag about being friends with him.  How do you respond to his beastly attack on Bernie Steinberg and Harvard Hillel regarding "Breaking the Silence"?  How do you react to Bernie's eloquent rebuff?  (I'm sure Bernie is also a good friend, by the way, so which friend are you siding with?)

March 24, 2008 1:24 PM

CRS9TNR said:

This is a good backgrounder on Wright.

I read Obama's Speech and wondered how Rev Wright was from the Older Generation.  Wright was 24 years old when the Civil Rights Legislation was passed.  So he really was one to benefit with his college degree and background.  In addition, he saw the huge progress of the last 40 years, so he should be particularly impressed with what America did.

The whole Wrigth affair is just a pecking party where the White Middle Class wants a head to hang on their wall to get even with the Sharptons that pulled down Don Imus.  If white folks can't say Nappy Headed Ho's, why does Wright get to say the things he does?

But Obama didn't mention Imus or Michael Kramer.  Those people deserved what they got.  Rev Wright is a good person so he's ok.

March 24, 2008 1:27 PM

rebml said:

Basman, if you're addressing your question to me, my answer is simple: As a Jewish American, I prefer a president who will support Israel's right to exist, not someone who has embraced the Palestinian myth of victimhood.  Because Mr. Obama's actions are so different from his rhetoric on Israel, any reasonable person would question his honesty (and judgement) on other important matters.

March 24, 2008 1:31 PM

teplukhin2you said:

I'm not going to ditch Obama, not at this point, anyway, and wouldn't expect Peretz to, either. But I think a little more skepticism and critical distance from Peretz's magazine toward BHO would be a good thing. For BHO the candidate and, eventually, BHO as POTUS. Maybe this Spine entry represents the first tentative step toward a (constructive, supportive) critical stance.

March 24, 2008 1:34 PM

r-ennis said:

Marty printed an anti-Hillary Hitchens Slate article. To even the score, here is an anti Obama one.

www.slate.com/.../2187277

March 24, 2008 1:35 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Re Hitchens' piece: Amen. er, Right on. This is classic:

"You often hear it said, of some political or other opportunist, that he would sell his own grandmother if it would suit his interests. But you seldom, if ever, see this notorious transaction actually being performed, which is why I am slightly surprised that Obama got away with it so easily. (Yet why do I say I am surprised? He still gets away with absolutely everything.)"

Yes, BHO gets away with everything because his starstruck friends haven't figured out that a lack fo critical distance in coverage of him HURTS Obama. Again, the man is a _politician_. He's not transcendent and can't be, because his political choices are constrained by the people who form his coalition. Sic semper politicus.

Those choices are fair game, and treating them as such will only strengthen him, not hurt him. Assuming, that is, that the man is as strong a political figure as his fans say he is. Only one way to find out.

March 24, 2008 2:20 PM

PrestoPundit said:

upbringing and attended a most mostly Jewish, mostly white integrated high school: "Rev. Wright had a comfortable upper-middle class upbringing. It was hardly the scene of poverty and indignity suggested by Senator Obama to explain what he calls Wright

March 24, 2008 2:38 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Read the whole Hitchens piece. Far and away the sharpest, shrewdest, mordantly funniest piece on this spectacle. His last sentence is dead on, and depressing.

If we can't get beyond race, can we at least get beyond our pious deference to religious hucksters fo all stripes and colors? And stop demanding of our politicians a level of piety and righteous BS that we do not impose on any other aspirant to executive leadership?

March 24, 2008 2:58 PM

basman said:

rebml

My comment is addressed to Peretz.

March 24, 2008 3:03 PM

RevMom said:

Wright's church did not honor Farrakhan, an independent publication founded by the church did that.  The uncomfortable connection is that Wright's daughter is associated with the publication.  Obama expressed his disapproval at the time (at least, he says he did.)

March 24, 2008 3:38 PM

lymon1 said:

A sidenote on Hitchens -- his moralizing is a bit hard given how he muzzles himself on Israel (he was practically the Joe Sobran of the left on Israel, after 9/11 if he's written anything pro-Palestinian, I've missed it).  He's the Mitt Romney of pundits -- always smooth, always windsocking.  

March 24, 2008 4:12 PM

lymon1 said:

Former TNR'er Spencer Ackerman writes a big article about Obama's foreign policy which strikes me as a liberal version of Milton Friedman's constructive engagement.  Democracy alone doesn't feed the hungry, so feed them and/or otherwise meet their basic needs and democracy will flourish.

No doubt we need large increases in the USAID budget and use this as a foreign policy tool, but if you think that not taking a hard line against dicatorships is effective, look at how democratic China has become in the last decade.  Bush's problem wasn't the pro-democracy talk was incorrect, but that he didn't mean it.  After 9/11 we were supposed to have this huge "spread democarcy" program in the Middle East -- it was gutted several times at the behest of our Arab "allies."  We hardly pushed for democracy in nations we were allied with -- Egypt, Pakistan, etc.  

March 24, 2008 4:31 PM

teplukhin2you said:

"windsocking"? Hitch goes AGAINST the wind more often than not. As a card-carrying member of  the United Front Against Bullsh*t, he's the scourge of the moralizers.

Speaking of which, he got in a devastating line against poor ol' EJ Dionne. Obamaphilia is making fools of even the smartest pundits.

March 24, 2008 4:34 PM

eudoxie said:

Jeremiah Wright: Child Of Privilege

He sure didn't come from the ghetto.

**************************

I'm not sure where you're coming from with this.

To that, I will say, SO WHAT?

Unlike NOW, in 2008, where coming from the ghetto would mean certain things about your life.

In Jeremiah Wright's day, as with my parents, the ONLY thing that determined how far you could go in life WAS BEING BLACK.

PERIOD.

There were PhD's working in the U.S. Post Office? Did you know that?

Mr. Peretz , you and the author seem to be under some delusion that segregation was better for some Blacks than others. It crushed ALL Black folk because what was possible for them was so limited.

It isn't not like it was for me or Obama's generation.

There was no ' what CAREER do you want?'

CAREER?

There was no such talk.

My father scored in the top 1% of the CPA Exam. He spoke another language outside of English.

But, my father was born in 1922, and so, his OPTIONS were severely limited. He worked at the Post Office, and then the Veterans Administration.

My mother was a Phi Beta Kappa who had 2 Masters Degrees before she was 25.

But, she was born in 1930....so, the only options open to her were TEACHER and SOCIAL WORKER.

THAT WAS IT.

You don't think that it would make you even MORE angry, if you had all this education, and intellectually, you knew you could match up to anyone, but weren't given even the remote shot of a chance because of the color of your skin? You don't think that would add to your anger?

I would like for you to explain how being a 'Child of Privilege' somehow negates the experience of Jim Crow on Jeremiah Wright's soul.

You don't think it's an accident that many of the leaders of the Black Community were among its more 'Privileged' Citizens, do you?

Martin Luther King - son of a Preacher

ED Nixon - Pullman Porter

Andrew Young - Son of Privilege

Julian Bond - Son of Privilege

Maynard Jackson - Son of Privilege

Very few of the leaders of the Black Community come from ' The Common Class'. Fannie Lou Hamer was an exception. The overwhelming majority were educated people.

March 24, 2008 4:35 PM

r-ennis said:

Another damning article about Obama's church. GTave voice to pro-Hamas sentiment.

www.jpost.com/.../Satellite

March 24, 2008 5:04 PM

Annabella2 said:

Look... I think the double standard that much of the world takes on Israel is utterly deplorable, BUT have any of you considered that it just might be to the US's advantage and ultimately even to Israel's if the next president of the US were  at least perceived to be  "more even handed."  Didn't Leon Wiesielter (sp?) suggest on these pages that Jews are still stuck in the medieval mind set that only the Prince's position on them counts to keep them safe from a hostile surrounding Christian population?  He had a point, as well as his suggestion that the position is a bit unrealistic in a democracy such as the USof A.

Would someone also care to explain to me how it has helped Israel to have Bush II be one of Israel's :best friends"?  I am told by people who should know that Bush and Co. urged Israel on in its ill fated and incomprehensible Lebanon war.  And how did it help Jews to have Bush/Cheney?Runsfeld's Iraq war pinned on the "neo-conservatives" which became a code word for Jews?

And what else does Obama have to do besides disown Wright's positions on Israel.  Or is this continuing refusal to believe Obama on that score a cover for goodness only knows what else?

But why should I be surprised.  I have long ago concluded that my fellow Jews often sound like political imbeciles when they are not being self-destructive zealots.

When did Jews, oblivious of their own past, become parties to guilt by association, media lynchings, facile analysis, lack of empathy... I could go on and on.

And what does having been middle class with a good education have to do with Wright's experiences as a Black man in Chicago no less... As a former New Yorker who moved here in 1967, let me tell you this is a different world and it hasn't been much better for Jews than it has been for Blacks, except we have been able to do better economically.  It is beginning to change, but this is still the most segregated city in the country and the distrust, both ways, has gone deep.  A Black colleague of mine in the late 60's told me that he would be afraid to venture into what used to be the Eastern European Blue Collar suburbs because he'd be afraid he'd be killed.  And he wasn't kidding.  He went on to a better place for a man of his skin color to become one of the leading academic deans in the country.

One of my sons, whom we left in the public schools  at a time that all our neighbors were pulling their kids out to send them to Whiter private schools and who is now 41, told me that he knew few black guys who were not seething with rage by the time they graduated from High School.  Both of my sons have told me this country simply too racist to elect a Black man.  This refluffle about Wright may be proving them right.

Is it the White man's fault?  Yes.  No.  But the message at TUCC (Wright/Obama's church) is nowhere near as Black and White as being made out in the over simplifying media.  TUCC's motto is "Unashamedly Black.  Unabashedly Christian."  Should it be "Ashamedly Black.  Abashedly Christian."  Get a grip!   Where would Jews be today if  they hadn't been proud of their heritage?  Well, why deny Blacks that right?  

Moreover TUCC of all the churches on the South Side has tried to minister to the brokenness in its own community... first by having the community take pride in itself and then by taking responsibility for its own repair.  Why knock that?

So... I guess my take on Obama is that he provides the best hope for Israel and Jews... because Jews do best when the communities in which they live are in a state of "repair."  America today is sadly broken in too many ways... and race is one of those ways.  As Obama clearly sees it is all of our respective ethnic grievances that are getting in the way of communal repair.  Economic issues go unaddressed as we are distracted by unnecessary wars and corporate greed of as one of my friends (a world class financier of fabulous weath put it to me) of an "obscene" kind...

So as Obama said in his speech.  We can go on being distracted by our differences and by the red herrings that get put out there to distract us or we can come together around common issues and concerns and begin addressing the issue of repair for our entire community.

March 24, 2008 5:14 PM

Annabella2 said:

Eudoxie... Say it man!  Say it the way it was and thank God no longer is.  But wasn't Obama right when, quoting Faulkner, he said that " the past isn't dead and buried.  It isn't even past yet."  And that goes for all of us... we each of us as individuals and as groups have our own narratives and thus our own prism on the world and on our takes on words that get spoken.  Sometimes I even wonder if we even see or hear what the other sees and hears.  And nothing is harder than to see the world through the eyes of, as Martin Buber put it, "The Other."  Yet only if we do and have the empathy to understand what it might be like to walk in the shoes of that Other for just a little bit is there any hope for any one us.  And that is why Obama remains a candidate par excellence.  His background has forced him to see The Other as part of Himself, at least to some extent.  What a useful for us all prism on the world.

We, as a country, need that as much as we need anything right now.  Or as Obama also said, we can let all the red herrings divide us on and on and on and thereby put off making the necessary repairs to our body politic.

March 24, 2008 6:54 PM

discarded lies - hyperlinkopotamus said:

Rev. Wright's Poverty-Stricken Childhood

March 24, 2008 8:38 PM

r-ennis said:

I would agree with Annabella except that being "even handed" essentially means pressuring Israel to cave in to Arab demands without any assurance of reciprocity or even good will.

Bush has been condemned for ignoring the Israeli-Palestinian situation, but I had occasion to read Gen Zinni's account of his peace mission to the Middle East early in the Bush presidency, which tells a different story.

Zinni came with no preconceived ideas and listened to both sides. He came up with a proposal which, according to him was more favorable to the Palestinians than to Israel. Much to his surprise, Israel accepted it but the Palestinians rejected it. After this Bush recalled Zinni and that was that.

March 25, 2008 9:55 AM

teplukhin2you said:

'have any of you considered that it just might be to the US's advantage and ultimately even to Israel's if the next president of the US were  at least perceived to be  "more even handed"

Yes, long and often. We've had numerous initiatives, forays, peace processes etc re I-P during my adult lifetime-- every US president has his own dream of bringing peace to I & P -- and they've all failed. Every one of them.

From which I conclude that America's advantage, as you put it, lies in REDUCING, not increasing, the amount of US bandwidth and political capital we devote to this problem-without-a-solution.  Whether we're "even-handed" or not is irrelevant. There is no solution so long as Israel's negotiating partner either won't negotiate in good faith or can't deliver on any promises made at the negotiating table. Not a damned thing we or Israel or anyone but the Palestinians can do about that.

Limit the downside. Turn our attention, as much as we possibly can, to east and south Asian theatres that are far more important to US interests in this century.

March 25, 2008 1:02 PM

Double click this space to insert your ad.