TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
02.03.2008
Bloomberg for Vice President?

Well, some people say he's running for governor of New York as a
Republican. This would be hard for the Empire State G.O.P. to
swallow. After all, a few months ago Bloomberg actually quit the
Republican Party -- maybe because he was serious thinking about throwing
himself into the fight for the Democratic presidential nomination. Other
folk speculate that he'd prefer to fight Eliot Spitzer for the State
House within the parameters of the Democratic Party.

Why is Bloomberg so fungible? Maybe because he has $10 or even $15 billion
to his name. He could finance any campaign in which he was himself a
candidate, including a race for the vice presidency.

In a speculative but shrewd column in Sunday's New York Post, John
Avlon argues that, "The likely nominees John McCain and Barack Obama both
have compelling reasons to consider Bloomberg for veep -- as well as
considerable risk to their reputations as reformers." The compelling
reasons are not just financial. But how would it sit with the American
people if the second candidate were to open his ticket to the charge that
the election was being literally bought by him?

But Bloomberg has other liabilities. If he is the Republican nominee,
McCain will not be able to calm those in his party who are, to say the
least, ambivalent about him and deeply doubt his conservatism.

If Obama chooses Bloomberg, would the fact that the mayor of New York is
also Jewish not make the ticket seem dangerously alien to many
Americans? A black man and a Jew. That would be crossing not one but two
enormous thresholds.
 


 

Posted: Sunday, March 02, 2008 8:06 PM with 7 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

roidubouloi said:

Bloomberg brings nothing to the Obama ticket.  NY is a very blue state.  Bloomberg is not going to win over centrists let alone Republicans.  Bloomberg brings nothing to help with Obama's big weakness compared to McCain, military/FP credibility.  This is the sort of proposal only a policy wonk could love.  Shrewd?  You think this is shrewd?  I think it is absurd.

March 2, 2008 9:58 PM

lymon1 said:

President Michael Bloomberg?  I don't see that selling.  And Bloomberg would make a great anti-tax poster boy for the GOP.  

March 3, 2008 6:19 AM

amidut said:

Really, what does Bloomberg stand for? On Iraq? On single health insurance? Other national issues? Why is he allowed to evade the primaries and the vetting process faced by the other candidates? There are other questions: his relationship with Lenora Fulani and Fred Newman of the whatever freak party in New Yorik? his hostile uncooperative behavior toward the 9-11 Commission?

March 3, 2008 6:51 AM

teplukhin2you said:

Bloomberg is a liberal whose record of governance puts him to the left of any of the major candidates (and on most issues, to the left of Kucinich as well). There is utterly no reason for him to run on any but a Democratic ticket. That this egotistical little man refused to submit to the indignities of the Democratic nominating process suggests a contempt for not just the democratic process but for the Democratic Party itself.

Perhaps it gladdens hearts in certain quarters to see someone of Bloomberg's wealth raise his middle finger to the process and to the Democratic Party, but this voter finds the man's arrogance repulsive. Screw him.

March 3, 2008 11:53 AM

teplukhin2you said:

Obama's VP choice doesn't matter. The man's in superb health and will easily serve two terms. He needs to tell us whether his liberalism truly is transformative-- eg, whether he will overhaul our ridiculous tax code, provide UHC, end corporate welfare, reward work and stop showering goodies on hedgefunders and their ilk, etc-- or just another version of tax-and-spend same ol' same ol'.

Given the man's health and age, McCain's VP choice matters hugely. He needs to put forth the very best VP candidate he can find. As a liberal I have no problem with his adding a liberal like Bloomberg to the ticket-- it might not be a bad idea, actually-- but it's about as likely as Obama's choosing Pat Buchanan.

I'm still betting that McCain will be bold and put Bobby Jindal on the ticket. Risky, sure, but potentially a masterstroke that would bolster his cred with conservatives while stealing Obama's thunder on the youth and multi-culti front.

March 3, 2008 12:00 PM

wildboy said:

I second Roid.  The only thing that Bloomberg would bring to Obama's ticket is his own very fat wallet, and that's not an area in which Obama will be hurting against McCain (even if there is a drawn-out primary fight).  And, as you correctly note, that money would be at least as much of a liability as an asset because of charges that his VP is basically helping him buy the election.

March 3, 2008 12:03 PM

jblum8156 said:

I would rather see Bloomberg as NY Governor than as VP for either candidate. I think he's a hell of a good mayor and has a lot to offer New York. I can't see him in Washington, we've had too many rich white men there.

March 3, 2008 3:57 PM

Double click this space to insert your ad.