TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
12.01.2009
Damon Linker on Religion, Liberalism, and Richard John Neuhaus

Damon Linker had a busy weekend on his new TNR blog: He wrote a thoughtful reflection on the life of essayist and theologian Richard John Neuhaus, he surveyed other remembrances of Neuhaus, and he conducted a two-part debate with Ross Douthat over Neuhaus and religion's place in liberalism.

Click here to visit Linker's blog for TNR.

Posted: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:56 AM with 3 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

jhildner said:

I don't want to be mean to Marty's cousin, or whoever is in charge of this amateurish website, but I don't understand what's so difficult about making Linker's blog linkable from the homepage and sidebars.

January 12, 2009 11:39 AM

Geoff G said:

Right on, jhildner!! And it seems like a few weeks back an item on the Plank linked to an article by Michelle Goldberg, which seemed to be on a hidden blog like Linker's. What's up? If you're going to hide a blog, I can think of better candidates (okay, a better candidate, and I think we know which) than Linker and Goldberg.

January 12, 2009 12:23 PM

Androscoggin said:

(1) The website is indeed amateurish. (2) Linker shouldn't get his own TNR blog.  He's better than, say, Kirchick, but his TNR piece a while back on the "new atheists" was sloppy and suggested that he lacks a basic understanding of liberalism. I'd say that the piece was intellectually dishonest, but that would imply that Linker (a) read the books he was attacking and then (b) misrepresented their arguments on purpose -- and I'm not confident that either of those things is true.

January 12, 2009 2:15 PM