TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
07.01.2009
They'll Leave The Light on for Them

This past weekend, the Obama family made its much-anticipated move to Washington. Since the Blair House, the traditional D.C. residence of the incoming first family, was already booked, the Obamas have had to slum it at the nearby five-star Hay-Adams hotel, across from Lafayette Park. Traffic's been jammed up all around the hotel, and the security tents are imposing, all of which got us to wondering: Did Obama have to rent out the entire hotel? What does something like that cost? And what happened to the other hotel guests who were booked for these days? Have they been shipped off to, gasp, a chain hotel? We found answers:

  • The Obamas rented out a whole wing of the hotel to accommodate the future first family, Secret Service agents, and Obama aides.
  • The Obama hotel tab will be about $20,000 per night to accommodate the entire party.
  • With this nightly bill, the president-elect's two-week stay at the Hay-Adams (the Obamas move into Blair House on January 15 after former Australian Prime Minister Howard vacates) will total approximately $280,000.
  • The transition and inaugural committees will share the responsibility for paying the hotel bill. The two teams receive their funding from both taxpayer dollars and private individual donations (a maximum $5,000 and $50,000 for the transition and inauguration, respectively).
  • The Hay-Adams website is still accepting reservations for most nights during the Obamas's two-week stay; vacant rooms range from $565 ("superior queen bedroom") to $3,200 ("one bedroom luxury suite with a view of Lafayette Park") per night.
  • A representative of the public relations department at the Hay-Adams refused to comment to The New Republic on "guests who may or may not be staying at the hotel" and stressed that the hotel's restaurant, bar, and guestrooms remain open to the public. Just prepare to be frisked...
--Daniel Belkin
 

Posted: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:53 PM with 9 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

iambiguous said:

As in the presidential campaign, the government is willing to pony up some of the money used to implement the transition team and the inagguration festivities, but not nearly enough for what is "needed". So that opens the door for lots and lots of "outside" doners. If you go over to the a OpenSecrets site they have a list of hundreds of donors and the amount they gave. It includes a lot from the corporate sector---Microsoft--$50,000, Exxon--$50,000 Keystone Group--$50,000, Hewlett-packard--$10,000, Vertex Pharmaceuticals--$50,000, Sony-BMG music--$50,000 etc. But what struck me as kind of odd is how many donors gave $10,000 to $50,000, yet in the column listing "Employer", it said these donors for Not Employed or Self-employed. Dozens and dozens and dozens of them.

Who are these folks?

george walton

January 7, 2009 7:34 PM

nbarry said:

As Jay Leno said, Obama is the first Democrat to take a hotel room in Washington under his real name.

January 7, 2009 10:00 PM

mollysimon said:

George:  Fascinating list, there.  Actually, sickening is more like it.  I become less and less enchanted with Obama the closer we get to inauguration.  

Also, why is Howard there?  It's kind of an insult.  The guy is a former prime minister.

January 7, 2009 10:16 PM

ironyroad said:

Hm.  Let's see.  As far as we know, through either mean-spiritedness or incompetence the Bush administration blocked off Blair House as the traditional in-between residence for the President-elect and his people.  This meant that Obama had to find an alternative option.  Fixing up the alternative (and keeping shtumm about the unnecessary trouble he was put to) leads to mollysimon finding this "sickening."

Probably she's going to be really pissed that Obama wants to go through this silly "inauguration" thing.  In her world, the Obamas are lucky they didn't find the Mall already booked for Jan 20.

January 8, 2009 1:05 AM

michael said:

 Note to mollysimon: "From the very fountain of enchantment there arises a taste of bitterness to spread anguish amongst the flowers." Lucretius

 I know, Lucretius also wrote, in the midst of the fountain of wit there arises something bitter, which stings in the very flowers...

January 8, 2009 9:46 AM

kgrant1054 said:

"Of course I let the perfect be the enemy of the good."  - mollysimon

January 8, 2009 10:21 AM

WoodyBombay said:

I think what sickened molly is that Obama has accepted donations from Big Evil (Exxon, Vertex, etc.) That is an indication that he might not actually outlaw big corporations after all.

January 8, 2009 12:33 PM

GSpinks said:

George, where are you getting those numbers from? I see nothing that looks anything like what you are "citing".

January 8, 2009 1:06 PM

mollysimon said:

Irony, you're probably gone by now, but yes, I find it sickening that big money is underwriting Obama's hotel stay.  As George put it:   "As in the presidential campaign, the government is willing to pony up some of the money used to implement the transition team and the inauguration festivities, but not nearly enough for what is "needed". So that opens the door for lots and lots of "outside" donors."  

I like how sexist you are, too.  "Inauguration THINGY"?  Like you'd ever fling that at a man.  Even a man you find as stupid as me.  Where you're hostility comes from, I've no idea, but perhaps you're in need of a little deprogramming.  Any criticism of your hero seriously leaves you unhinged.

And since you mention it, yes, the money he's spending on his inauguration is unseemly, especially now.  

I voted for him, by the way, but that doesn't make me a cult member.  Perhaps you need some de-programming.

January 8, 2009 10:20 PM