TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
02.01.2009
In Which Bowl Games Deliver Me Into the Hands of the Far Left

Several days of watching college football bowl games have left me with a fresh resentment for corporate America. It's the bowl sponsorship arrangement. I could accept it when the Sugar Bowl became the Nokia Sugar Bowl and the Orange Bowl became the FedEx Orange Bowl. I was even able to swallow hard and live with it when the smaller bowls lost their non-corporate identity altogether, as when the Outback Hall of Fame Bowl has simply become the Outback Bowl.

But what really gets me is the obligatory CEO interview. At every one of these games, the announcers must take five minutes to speak with the CEO of the sponsoring company. He is treated as a visiting patron, prodded to share his interest in the community that sparked his sponsorship decision. Often he will share his Business Philosophy as his interlocuters gaze on in wonder. Of course it takes place during the action so nobody can flip away without missing some plays. And then -- this is what really burns me -- they thank him for sponsoring the game, as if the game wouldn;t be happening without his beneficience. Oh, thank you, sir, for taking this advertising opportunity. Back in the days when this game was called the Florida Citrus Bowl, life was practically unbearable. Now that it is the Capital One Bowl, and giant credit card logos decorate the playing field, we spectators can finally enjoy ourselves.

I wish, just once, the sideline reporter or play-by-play announcer who conducts this nauseating ritual would turn out to be a Marxist mole willing to immolate his career for one glorious on-air moment. Instead of reading from his cue card, he would say, "Capitalist Pig, last year most of your workforce earned wages that would not allow them to raise a family outside of poverty, while you took home $473 million, including a private jet and your own vacation island. Meanwhile this arrangement is hammered home by the ubiquitous corporate logos plastered over every inch of the stadium. Give me one good reason why the crowd shouldn't tar and feather you right here on the spot."

Sadly, all the Marxists are in academia rather than broadcast sports. That's the problem with Marxists. They're everywhere you don't want them to be and nowhere you really need them

--Jonathan Chait

Posted: Friday, January 02, 2009 11:30 AM with 23 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

dkrieger said:

"They're everywhere you don't want them to be"

Did I read that right? You don't like Marxists in academe? Great, we agree on something.

BTW, I watched the triumphant Trojans yesterday in the Granddaddy of Them All, otherwise known as the (no corporate affiliation needed) Rose Bowl.

Fight on!

January 2, 2009 12:00 PM

dylanposer said:

"Sadly, all the Marxists are in academia rather than broadcast sports. That's the problem with Marxists. They're everywhere you don't want them to be and nowhere you really need them."

This sounds like the Visa jingle.  I think you are more affected that you realize, Jon.

January 2, 2009 12:24 PM

nbarry said:

What about Keith Olbermann?

January 2, 2009 12:47 PM

jet said:

ha ha! Jon.  I was watching some FedEx exec give a speech before the Orange Bowl Jan. 1, and was thinking "you should be out here thanking us profusely for continuing to patronize your service and begging us to continue to do so.  Now, get off my TV screen, you have nothing with what's going on here except be thankful you're still in business and be thankful you participate in a system that allows you to plaster your name all over the place."

I can't be certain as I can't get the video to play for me, but I think it was the "Glory of Orange" video on the FedEx Orange Bowl site.  There may have been a 'thank you' in there, but the sound was down that night as I watched it before the game, and the executive in the video at that time didn't look desperate enough.

January 2, 2009 1:02 PM

WoodyBombay said:

dkrieger,

Are you referring to The Rose Bowl Game Presented by Citi?

I remember watching a Culligan Holiday Bowl a few years ago - the mighty Texas Longhorns were playing - and the Culligan water guy on the sidelines went on and on about how "the young people of today want to stay hydrated." Good times.

January 2, 2009 1:05 PM

JEFF FREY said:

For me, it is the "Flomax halftime show" that took it over the top. I can tune out the CEOs.

Besides, wasn't the Florida Citrus Bowl sponsored by the Florida Citrus growers association anyway/ I think you have to go back to the days when it was called the Tangerine Bowl to find any purity.

January 2, 2009 1:21 PM

sportdoc62 said:

Not sure why you would look for a Marxist among broadcasters, Jonathan.  About the closest leftist media personality in sports I can think of is David ZIrin:  http://www.edgeofsports.com/

You might have noted that the taxpayers are bailing out everything, including sponsorships such as these and other sports marketing campaigns, as seen by that radical leftist, Justin Rood of ABC New's :  www.abcnews.go.com/.../story

--From a happy Marxist in academe who isn't leaving any time soon (Bronx cheer to you, dkreiger).

January 2, 2009 1:37 PM

blackton said:

The only good thing about having a 4 month old cranky baby with a cold is that I only can pretty much pay attention to the action on the field as I walk back and forth in my tv room carrying him.

dylan, good posting.

January 2, 2009 1:41 PM

Bukharin said:

Пролетариат должен ликвидировать эти языческие капиталистов!

January 2, 2009 1:42 PM

rjb9 said:

Hmmm...so you are upset that broadcasters would actually thank their sponsors?  What are you expecting to hear:  "You know, Phil, I understand that your firm has given us the money that keeps us in business, part of which ultimately flows through to the colleges and universities that must pay for their coaching staffs, travel and administration.  Now bugger off, you capitalist swine."  I suggest TNR do the same thing with their advertisers...or better yet, Jonathan, why not tell all your readers to take a hike?  Can you imagine *thanking us* for subscribing to your magazine and site just so we can read your posts?  How lame that would be!\

There are lots of things to complain about in college sports, starting with the fact that so-called student athletes are the only ones in the industry not making any money.  But thanking people who are giving you money--even if they are getting something in return--is not one of them.

January 2, 2009 1:45 PM

fbacon2 said:

I suggest the Wayne's World Strategy.  Let the sports announcer read from the script, but write messages on the back of his notecards for the cameras to see.

"So, tell me.  When did the Qualified Reassurance Corporation start taking an interest in south-central Louisiana college football?"

[Hold up notecard...]

www.youtube.com/watch

January 2, 2009 1:51 PM

I Majorajam said:

Right on! And the CEO's aren't even the freaking patrons- they're EMPLOYEES! for christ sake. Can we at least have the chairman of the board, who at least nominally represents the actual patrons of the tasteless advertizing bonanza, i.e. the company's owners, (even as he or she actually reports to the company CEO in the wonderful corporate arrangements we've set up for ourselves in this plutocrac... I mean, country). And who can even sit through the Super Bowl any more? It's a six hour nauseathon with some commercial breaks for football. Ah!!! Now you've gone and gotten me started.

January 2, 2009 1:57 PM

roidubouloi said:

If there is any safe place for Marxists, it is only in the academy where they occasionally have interesting critiques of the world outside and at least offer an alternative point of view.  Anyplace outside the academy -- i.e. anyplace where they can actually wield power over anyone but each other, a few hapless students, and even more hapless college presidents -- they cannot resist the totalitarian urge that comes from the assumption that they know best how to order everything in the world (based not on any practical experience but on "theory") whether the world likes it or not.

Think of Marxists in the academy as the benign and colorful descendants of ferocious dinosaurs, entertaining with their color and songs if occasionally bearing lethal diseases.  If, however, they escape the academy, they quickly revert to their ferocious ancestry.

As for the bowl season, I am bereft that Michigan is not making an appearance this year making a dry and empty experience.  But we will be back.  Go Blue, Forever!

January 2, 2009 3:10 PM

Crock1701 said:

Oh, just don't pay attention to the CEOs.  As for the Corporate Bowl Names, like the Corporate Stadium Names, I have a simple rule.  If it sounds plausibly not a corporate, natural name, good.  Otherwise bad Examples:

Good: Outback Bowl, Emerald Bowl  

Bad: PapaJohns.com Bowl, Chick-fil-a Bowl, Capitol One Bowl

Good: Philips Arena, United Center, Ford Field, Heinz Field, Coors Field, Busch Stadium  

Bad: Quallcom Stadium, Invesco Field, Minute Maid Park, US Cellular Field, PETCO Park, Izod Center

Simple rule, really.

January 2, 2009 3:17 PM

drdannyu said:

See?  This is why I don't watch football, and instead concentrate my attention on the purely meritocratic pleasures of the Academy Awards.

January 2, 2009 4:43 PM

t-lazy said:

Crock1701: Minute Maid Park's former corporate moniker was even more unlikely.

Jonathan Chait: Awesome post. Regarding your last line, I believe this is an extension of the so-called "Rite-Aid Law", wherein said drugstore outlets are on every street corner until the very moment you actually need one, I have no idea where I picked this up, though it strikes me as something someone writing in to "Word Court" on the back page of the Atlantic would come up with....

January 2, 2009 4:52 PM

Political Animal said:

FRIDAY'S MINI-REPORT.... Today's edition of quick hits: * Wall Street started 2009 on the right foot, with all three of the major indexes closing up 3% or more. * Is an Israeli ground offensive in Gaza the next move? *...

January 2, 2009 5:22 PM

jheaton said:

Norman Chad said it first, writing in 1999 about Fox's coverage of Super Bowl XXXIII: "Fox was in commercial for a Keanu Reeves movie when the ball was snapped on John Elway's 80-yard touchdown pass to Rod Smith in the second quarter.  I'm telling you, Marx and Engels may have had a point about capitalism being the most destructive, corrosive force known to mankind."

January 2, 2009 6:13 PM

miguknamja4 said:

Great blog!

Perhaps the corporate sponsors should hand out their respective products as well as beg for forgiveness. They'll have another year, maybe two, to stel consumer attention.

January 2, 2009 8:36 PM

jobeek2 said:

Roidubouloi - no Marxist can resist the totalitarian urge? Did you really mean to write that? Are you equating Marxists with communists?

January 2, 2009 11:06 PM

roidubouloi said:

I meant exactly what I said, jobeek.  Marxists are only benign when far from the levers of power.  If you read Marx and take him seriously, revolutionary violence, and the suppression of bourgeois tendencies by violent means if necessary (and of course it becomes necessary) are inevitably justified to prevent capitalists from appropriating labor surplus.  One thing leads to another.  I am not confusing Marxism with Leninism or communism, although both are a concrete expression of Marxism.  No need.  

Even in the small circle of academia, the Marxists never tire of trying to suppress someone's speech.  My view is that the harm they do is limited only by the limited means at their disposal.  I wouldn't trust a Marxist to run a book club, but I am very pleased to listen and learn from all of my Marxist professors (and at The New School for Social Research, that's many if not most of them).  

January 2, 2009 11:36 PM

bl462 said:

"Capitalist Pig..."?   What's next, references to "running dog lackeys" and calls for "re-education camps"?  Not funny.  It doesn't sound as if it took Bowl games to deliver Chait into the hands of the Far Left.  

January 4, 2009 3:57 PM

cspencef said:

Crock1701: So I'm guessing you're not a fan of the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl, right?

Come on, does one really have to be some kind of Marxist to find the corporate plunder of bowl games stupid and obnoxious?  I don't think so.  

January 5, 2009 12:30 PM