TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
29.10.2008
The Informercial

There’s a reason that people have hopes that Obama might make a transformational president. It’s not just that he has inherited a political environment suited to achieving substantial goals. Obama can simply and clearly communicate his ideas, and his people have a remarkable grasp on how technology can be exploited to further amplify them. These sorts of sales skills are prerequisites for making, say, health care reform possible. 

Now, that was an impressively effective commercial--understated, for the most part, and filed with evocative images. I had feared kitsch, but those fears proved to be unfounded. It was Reaganesque in its ability to combine anecdote and policy.

It also makes for quite the contrast. McCain is talking about socialism and Ayers, while Obama has stripped his rhetoric of any hint of ideology. And where McCain often seems on the verging of ripping out someone’s gullet these days, Obama struck a convincingly empathetic tone. OK. It’s not a good idea to admit that you were seduced by an infomercial. But that was one helluva closing argument. (Perhaps, Noam will be less nervous now.) 

Update: Howard Wolfson also likes it.  

--Franklin Foer  

Posted: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:18 PM with 3 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

benjamin81 said:

Did anyone else notice that the opening music is from "A Beautiful Mind"? (With words, the tune is "All Love Can Be.")

October 29, 2008 10:37 PM

jhildner said:

Well, I'll be the first to (sort of) dissent.  I thought it was boring.  For my taste, it was too soothing.  I often go to bed with some bit of nice, familiar TV on low volume.  I should have taped this for that purpose.

What's more, I thought the policy explanations were not punchy enough, clear enough, detailed enough, or adequately tied to the people whose stories were featured.  The auto worker, in particular, didn't get any accompanying policy discussion.  It transitioned jarringly from his story to Iraq.  I was left wondering, so what are you gonna do for *this* guy?  *Then* was the time to talk about the car of the future being built in the U.S., as Obama frequently does.  Maybe something was cut for time.  I'll await the director's commentary on DVD, complete with deleted scenes.

More fundamentally, it didn't build.  It maintained the same intensity throughout -- low intensity.  By the time we went to the live portion, it didn't feel like the big reveal it was supposed to feel like.  It felt like we were watching episode 32 of a Ken Burns documentary.

This has been referred to as Obama's "closing argument."  But -- and perhaps this is my main problem with it -- it wasn't really an "argument" at all.  Arguments rely structurally, although certainly not in every aspect of their presentation, on harnessing the force of reason to persuade.  This ad did not really do that.  The overwhelming sense was one of pure emotional appeal.

Now, my negative review does not mean that the ad wasn't smart or effective.  I am a firm Obama voter.  I do not need to be reassured that Obama is safe, or nice, or cares about the struggling middle class.  I already know all of that.  I suppose that this ad was meant to appeal to those who need that reassurance, and I suppose that it was probably effective in that regard.  Still, I can't help but think that it could have better demonstrated the clarity of vision and purpose, as well as the passion, that Obama routinely shows on the stump.  In any event, as TV, with all due respect to the Academy and the Oscar-winning director, I give it about a B-.

October 29, 2008 11:01 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

jhildner, I would generally agree with your assessment. I found it underwhelming and yes, it did seem to lack focus. Also it was soft and very Democrat-oriented. But it doesn't seem likely to hurt him, so whatever.

October 29, 2008 11:39 PM