TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
16.10.2008
A Personal Plumbing Note

 Jon has very shrewdly asked whether Joe the Plumber is the same as Joe Six-Pack.

Couple of points I feel compelled to make as someone who has developed a close and extremely expensive relationship with various plumbers over the years.

1. While plumbers may be blue-collar employees, they're hardly the same as the low-wage laborers weeding lawns, busing tables, cleaning offices, and, yes, providing childcare to many of the nation's youngest citizens. Just having a plumber set foot in my house costs slightly less than the ensemble Cindy McCain wore for her convention speech. (OK. I exaggerate--but only because of the jewelry.)

2. Beyond that, there is a difference between the guys who do the plumbing and the guys who own the business. As my husband kept grousing at the TV last night, Joe the Plumber, as we are being introduced to him, is really Joe the Aspiring Plumbing Company Owner. Anyone recall Vincent Gardenia's academy-award winning turn as Cosmo Castorini in "Moonstruck"--the Brooklyn plumbing magnate who went around rhapsodizing about copper pipes and was, as everyone kept pointing out, "as rich as Roosevelt"? There is a reason that stereotype is so funny. Although, as someone who earns considerably less than my plumber--much less his boss--I find it as painful as it is funny.

This is not to say that Joe the Plumber deserves to be treated like some sharp-suited derivatives trader. (Although, these days, Joe may have the financial edge there.) He has worked his butt off at an unglamorous job and is looking to take the next step up the ladder. But don't ask me to pity him because he might have to pay slightly higher taxes. As Obama noted, it would be heavenly if none of us had to pay any taxes. But here in Realityland, tough choices must be made and priorities set. Any politician who can't admit that is either delusional or dishonest. 

--Michelle Cottle


Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:03 AM with 7 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

ralphnelle said:

I wish Obama would say that he's not raising taxes on the upper 5% to "spread the wealth." He's doing it to pay off the Bush-McCain debt. Yes, Joe the plumber doesn't like taxes. None of us do. But if he gets mad at anyone, it should be McCain and the others who supported Bush's budget, because they are the ones who ran up the bills, not Obama.

Perfect political analogy: if you run up the debt on your credit card, you can't get mad at your spouse when he or she pays the bill with the cash in your checking account. Your spouse is doing the right thing in cleaning up your mess.

October 16, 2008 11:39 AM

drdannyu said:

One teensy little quibble.  "Moonstruck," I am somewhat abashed to admit, is my favorite movie of all time.  Sadly, Vincent Gardenia didn't win the Oscar for his (wonderful, totally believable) performance.  His costars Olympia Dukakis and Cher deservedly won theirs.

October 16, 2008 12:00 PM

a_long said:

so Joe the Plumber is upset. let's find out how much more he's going to have to pay.

From the handy chart in Parade last weekend, which was probably seen by at least 25 million of the 72.6 million people it reaches every week:

Under Obama's plan,

If you're in the top 5% of earners...

$227,000-$603,400

you'd pay...

$121

This info is from TaxPolicyCenter.org

Joe will not be affected. He is an ideologue who "hates" social security and the tax system and thinks Obama will force us into Socialism. Garden-variety wingnut.

October 16, 2008 12:47 PM

satyendra said:

Actually, does a plumber's income depend on whether he's unionized or not, or can most plumbers find a shop like Joe the Plumber wants to buy and ostensibly earn a decent living?

October 16, 2008 2:34 PM

psantillana said:

That interview with whatsherface, Diane Sawyer [I saw it here: andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/.../a-regular-joe.html]

was maddening. I wanted Sawyer to scream, "well who do you think SHOULD pay taxes, you STUPID BITCH!?" but, strangely, she didn't.

October 16, 2008 8:48 PM

johnchen1 said:

Of course as we have learned about Joe the Plumber: He doesn't earn anything close to $250,000/year. He's not actually a plumber. His real name is Sam. And he thinks that Barack dances as well as Sammy Davis Jr.

October 17, 2008 1:14 AM

fougasseu said:

Enough with Joe, he's not a plumber, Gordon's a plumber!

Gordon Liddy, of Watergate break-in fame, is the original gun-totin', wild-eyed, bald-headed, election-stealin' plumber of Nixon fame, who's now a radio-talkin' ex-felon, busy pallin' around with John McCain.

Plumbers are tough guys, real Americans!

October 18, 2008 8:10 AM