TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
08.10.2008
Today's Polls: Obama Now a 9:1 Favorite

I'm short on time today, so let's keep this on point: John McCain is in deep trouble. In spite of some incremental gains that McCain has made in some of the national tracking polls, the set of state polling that follows is so strong for Obama that he continues to hit record marks in all three of our projection metrics. We are now projecting Obama to win the election 90.5 percent of the time, with an average of 346.8 electoral votes, and a 5.4-point margin in the national popular vote.



There simply isn't any good news in here for John McCain (all right, he's kicking butt in Oklahoma). The only swing state poll that he leads is the SurveyUSA result in North Carolina, but even there, Obama has bounced back from a 20-point deficit in a SuvreyUSA poll taken shortly after the Republican Convention.

Moreover, Obama's position in the electoral vote remains even stronger than his position in the popular vote. We project him to win all of John Kerry's states by at least 6.9 points (New Hampshire remains the weakest link). We also project him to win Iowa by 12.5 points, New Mexico by 7.7, Virginia by 7.3 and Colorado by 6.9. Getting this race back to a tie might not be sufficient for John McCain; he might need to pull ahead by 1 or even 2 points nationally to mitigate Obama's edge in the battleground states.

--Nate Silver

Posted: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:21 PM with 12 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

icarusr said:

Brooks predicts a nine-point win, after calling Sarah Palin a "cancer for the Republican Party".  And here I thought Brooks had gone all wobbly for the Palin's cleavage.

www.huffingtonpost.com/.../david-brooks-sarah-palin_n_133001.html

October 8, 2008 3:38 PM

FWright said:

"I'm short on time today"

No surprise there.  Great appearance on Colbert yesterday.

October 8, 2008 3:42 PM

mcorey.geo said:

But wait! He cavorts with Weathermen! I made deals with Tip O'Neill!! Look at dem Russkies!!! WHY CAN'T IT BE @#$^&& 1978??????????????

October 8, 2008 4:08 PM

leertracy said:

If this was just a matter of polling, I'd be more nervous. Even considering the intelligent and documented posts here about the Bradley Effect, I'd be really dismissive.

But what really makes me think the polling is accurate is the on-the-ground reports that we've gotten from you guys on the road. We've heard about the Obama ground game, but you've reported it, and you've run into state after state where the GOP isn't in the same league.

Apparently the excitement for Palin is resulting in more people showing up to see her, but not many more people volunteering. Indeed, the ironic thing here is that after all the 'celebrity' slams. it turns out that the GOP VP is the true celebrity -- people are excited to see her, they love to gossip about her, but they aren't making phone calls for her or traveling to other states to canvas for her.

October 8, 2008 4:08 PM

BHLnyc said:

What's the matter with Oklahoma?

October 8, 2008 4:41 PM

blackton said:

BH, my thoughts exactly. The funny thing is McCain's national numbers might be being propped up in yahoo territory, giving so Repubs a false sense of security. I say fine, let Oklahoma go 100% for McCain, let the people there feel like they aren't the real Americans, that they are not in touch with everyone else instead of their prattling on how they represent America.

October 8, 2008 6:31 PM

mcorey.geo said:

What an awful place. That and Utah!

October 8, 2008 6:59 PM

psantillana said:

Nate, what do you think about Missouri?

October 9, 2008 6:51 AM

frilz1 said:

When this election is over the GOP will have to sit down and ask themselves how things could have gone to hell for them so fast. In 2004 they had the White House, both houses of Congress, a path to total Supreme Court domination, and Karl Rove's dreams of a decades long hegemony for Republicans. In 2006 the Dems took over Congress and in 2008 will take over everything. The cause, it will be determined, for this gigantic fall has a face, its name is GEORGE BUSH!

October 9, 2008 7:12 AM

imsa004a said:

"What an awful place. That and Utah!"

Oh? You should live in Nebraska!

October 9, 2008 9:48 AM

Political Animal said:

THURSDAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP....Today's installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn't generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers: * The Obama campaign unveiled a minute-long biographical piece last night, emphasizing

October 9, 2008 12:01 PM

Wasatcher said:

Watch what you say about Utah. There may be some surprises this year from this reddest of red states. I have not seen a single McCain sign or bumper sticker, but I have seen a lot of them for Obama. McCain will surely take the state, but the Obama campaign, the first Democratic presidential campaign here in decades, is surprisingly strong. The campaign has been sending manpower to Colorado where their impact can be more significant.

Also, the Republicans here have been so dominant they have been eating their own and a five-term Republican house member was knocked out in the primary by a guy with a trunkful of skeletons that are just now clamoring to come out of his closet. The veto-proof legislature really pissed off the populace by passing a school voucher law that was overwhelmingly repealed by a referendum. Maybe nothing will change, but there is no more eternally optimistic soul than a Utah Democrat. But then, I walked Provo for George McGovern in '72, so maybe I'm just a slow learner.

October 9, 2008 3:01 PM