TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 10:31 AM
January 08, 2009 | 9:38 AM
January 08, 2009 | 9:22 AM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 10:50 AM
January 08, 2009 | 10:49 AM
January 07, 2009 | 12:40 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 10:36 AM
January 07, 2009 | 5:09 PM
January 07, 2009 | 3:00 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
07.10.2008
McCain's Missed Opportunity

I think Noam's right that McCain needs to do something dramatic and mavericky in tonight's debate, but he had a perfect opportunity to do that yesterday, and he blew it.

In case you haven't seen it, watch this video from a campaign rally McCain held yesterday in New Mexico. After McCain asks, "Who is the real Barack Obama?" someone in the crowd yells "Terrorist!" For a second there, McCain looks slightly taken aback, but then he pushes aside whatever qualms he might have and simply plunges ahead with the rest of his speech.

What if McCain, instead of continuing with his speech, had stopped cold, looked the audience member in the eye, and gently but sternly rebuked him with a homily about how we're all Americans and the problem with Obama isn't that he's a bad man or a terrorist, but that he's wrong on the issues? Sure, it would have been hypocritical--it's no coincidence McCain's supporters think Obama's a terrorist when you've got Sarah Palin accusing him of palling around with one--but it would have been dramatic and mavericky as hell, too. It would have been the lead campaign story on all the networks, it would have become a YouTube sensation, and it would have burnished McCain's badly tarnished brand as an atypically honorable and different sort of politician. 

And just in case you think that sort of moment never happens, it does. It even happened as recently as 2006 and, oddly enough, it came courtesy of Rudy Giuliani. As Slate's John Dickerson described the scene that occurred at a Republican campaign event in Potomac, Maryland:

As the mayor answered the last of the three questions from reporters, he talked about the root causes of terrorism: "oppressive governments that demagogue and blame and project their problems other places and do nothing to solve the problems of their own people."

"Sounds like the Democrats," shouted a man.

The crowd roared.

It was the kind of stupid remark candidates usually ignore. They either agree but can't show that they do, or they don't want to cause a stir by contradicting one of the partisans they've come to court. Giuliani's aides were already preparing to move him to his waiting SUV. He could have just left.

"Time out," he said bringing his hands together to make a T. "Time out." The crowd quieted down. "The other thing we have to learn is that we can't get into this partisan bickering. The fact is that Republicans and Democrats have the same objectives. … Democrats are loyal Americans. Republicans are loyal Americans. I think we have better answers, but we have to respect each other."

Of course, Dickerson's coda to this story was the prediction that "This guy is never going to get the nomination." But if McCain's going to spend the next four weeks throwing Hail Mary's, he might as well throw some that actually enhance his reputation, rather than further degrade it. After all, there's a reason Bob Dole was able to bounce back from his loss to Bill Clinton and score that Viagra endorsement deal.

--Jason Zengerle

Posted: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 10:08 AM with 17 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

icarusr said:

Jason, thanks for the Giuliani quote.  When McCain has to learn a lesson in civics and civility from Mad Dog Rudy, you know the man is far gone.

"What if McCain, instead of continuing with his speech, had stopped cold, looked the audience member in the eye, and gently but sternly rebuked him with a homily about how we're all Americans and the problem with Obama isn't that he's a bad man or a terrorist, but that he's wrong on the issues?"

What if my grandmother had wheels and wore yellow?  The "what if" makes no sense: this is what he has sown and he is reaping it; what's more, I'm sure he is revelling in it.  He's thinking, "He he, the message is sinking in; I'M WINNING; he he he [creepy malevolent smile]."  The man shouting out "terrorist" is the direct and intended result of the attacks POWPOW and the Palin are mounting on Obama.

What if, indeed.

October 7, 2008 10:52 AM

JEFF FREY said:

Sorry, Jason. What makes you believe that the John McCain who has been running for President in 2008 would actually do as you suggest? He didn't even act like that in the Republican primary. I was watched a clip from one of the GOP debates (thanks, Rhubarbs), and it was the same smirking guy we saw in debate one against Obama. Wake up and smell the real John McCain.

The fact is that McCain is losing on the issues, and losing on temperament. The only hope has left for victory is to smear Obama and pander to the fear, ignorance and racism (he has the explicit racists in his camp already, he needs to rope in those who are uneasy about Obama being black) of part of the electorate. He's not going to win on his health care plan, or his handling of the bailout, or his expertise in economics.

October 7, 2008 10:59 AM

Wasatcher said:

There is another more recent and more salient example.

John McCain, February 2008: “It’s my understanding that before I came in here a person who was on the program before I spoke made some disparaging remarks about my two colleagues in the Senate, Senator Obama and Senator Clinton,” he said. “I have repeatedly stated my respect for Senator Obama and Senator Clinton, that I will treat them with respect. I will call them ‘Senator.’ We will have a respectful debate, as I have said on hundreds of occasions. I regret any comments that may have been made about these two individuals who are honorable Americans.”

This was in response to talk show host Bill Cunningham repeatedly using Obama's middle name and taking cheap shots. Say it ain't so, Johnny.

thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/.../mccain-repudiates-hussein-obama-remarks

October 7, 2008 12:06 PM

moldndecay said:

At the GOP convention, McKrazy said that we were all Americans and he would run an honorable campaign. Guess those ideals are gone now that hes down in the polls. Sad really, to see someone sell themself out like this.

October 7, 2008 12:15 PM

ndmackenzie said:

I seem to remember John McCain not calling out a questioner for referring to Hillary Clinton as a "bitch," so I wouldn't get any hopes up about a suddent transition to honor from this man.

October 7, 2008 12:18 PM

Political Animal said:

HOPE VS. HATE, PART II.... Yesterday, we heard McCain/Palin supporters call Obama a "terrorist," use racial slurs, and exclaim that Obama should be "killed." Today, the hate continues. In the latest instance of inflammatory outbursts at McCain-Palin rallies

October 7, 2008 12:36 PM

moldndecay said:

Great line from NR,

"So, by all means, McCain should highlight Obama’s troubling friendships, but he has to be careful. If it’s the candidate of “change” versus the candidate of “change the subject,” he’ll lose in an electoral landslide."

— Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review

Obama should start using it in his campaign. "Im the cadidate of change, McKrazy is the candidate of change the subject. Dont like the economy, change the subject. Dont like your opponent, change the subject. Dont like the questions, change the subject. Dont like the past 8 years, change the subject".

Man he could hammer them with this. And it would resonate.

October 7, 2008 12:39 PM

fougasseu said:

Americans haven't been this afraid in years. The economy, the Middle East, immigration, the list is endless. Palin, the "Bride of Talk Radio", is playing on these nativist fears. Everything she says was said first by Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Levin, and others in Talk Radio, who make their living pandering to angry white males.

This isn't just dangerous for Obama and his family, it's dangerous for all of us. I saw an ugly confrontation at Target this week when someone just went off on a young man wearing an Obama t-shirt. It was an older woman who just tore into him about Obama being a traitor, etc.. The young man mumbled a weak defense and walked away. The woman continued to rant.

Palin and McCain are playing with fire.

October 7, 2008 12:57 PM

GSpinks said:

It is something of a shame that Obama, who regularly stops his speeches in order to rebuke some unruly audience member or overzealous partisan, receives scant praise; the first dozen times it was news worthy, now its yawn-worthy.

But, Oh! the celebration to be held should McCain once again decide to exhibit any of the decency for which he was known in prior election cycles.

October 7, 2008 1:05 PM

mjmckay said:

Five bucks to the person who, at the next McCain or Palin rally at which "terrorist" or "kill him" or "sit down, boy" is yelled from the crowd, shouts out "Give us Barabbas!" and then "Crucify him!" at the appropriate time.

(I don't know quite how to unpack that, but it sure seems of a piece.)  

October 7, 2008 1:34 PM

kj_593 said:

I disagree. It would have seemed ODD if he rebuked the person for responding just as he was hoping.  He was knowingly invoking the very language that has been floating in all of the various emails suggesting Obama was in league with terrorist or a Manchurian candidate.  In short, it would have completely muddy his entire point.

And anyone else notice that no Ayers ads have appeared?  Weren't they supposed to drop today?

October 7, 2008 1:41 PM

hellx said:

Yeah, it looked to me like McCain kind of smiled when that guy yelled out "terrorist."

October 7, 2008 2:03 PM

ironyroad said:

As this gets closer the propensity for genuine nutters to give the tone at McCain/Palin rallies will increase, including invocations to murder.  Either they deal with this or they are collaborating in it.

October 7, 2008 2:04 PM

Wandreycer1 said:

I'd love a fairy tale ending right about now.  I've had my jaw clenched so hard today from this, my entire head hurts.  Aren't you (the collective you out there in TNR land) so very tired of being angry and afraid?

I have a fantasy. McCain, with nothing to lose and (despite being a total prick) at 73 years old, a nagging desire to go out with his honor somehow restored - kicks Palin off the ticket tonight, in a brief phone call telling her its over.  He tells her she can tell the press whatever she wants, but he's telling them its all about her family.  He doesn't care.

This after a reasonably calm and at times even funny debate.  McCain calls the press himself and announces that Palin has dropped out - to take care of her family.  He does not care a whit about the consequences, what Palin says to anyone about what happened, or the death of his dream of being President.  He is at peace with his decision.  He lights a cigar and opens a good book.

The press goes mad.  Joe Lieberman steps in as a stand in the next montn until an orderly ending can come to this campaign.  McCain cuts his appearances to almost nothing and decides to rest by his pool for the duration.  Call up Henry, have a scotch and water and watch a sunset or two.

Palin is enveloped in the far right moronic nutter culture where she belongs and McCain never so mch as speaks to her again.  

Yeah, I know.  Lke I said, I'm just so tired of being angry and scared.

October 7, 2008 2:35 PM

icarusr said:

Wandrey: we keep going back and forth at this.  "his honor somehow restored" - the operative and incorrect verb there is "restored".  He never had any to have it restored.  He is, has been, and will forever be, a charlatan, a knave and a cad; "Honour", seeing McCain in a dark alley, flees for fear of being soiled.  McCain feels entitled; he wants to outdo Daddy Admiral and standing between him and his dream is an uppity unamerican nigger.  Shakespeare saw his type four hundred years ago: McCain is Macbeth and Prospero rolled into one; he is Iago, consumed with hatred and envy, with no thought whatever to the carnage he is causing or will be causing, to America or to its national psyche.  Why whipping up this frenzy, this orgy of violence, he is the real terrorist in all of this, using fear and fear of violence as a political weapon.

And you know why he won't drop the Palin?  Because has the hots for her, the old goat, and because she is useful to him, the same way the bag/hag Cindy is.  He'll drop the Palin after he has juiced her for all she's worth and not a moment earlier - and that will be November 4.

October 7, 2008 3:00 PM

chmclean said:

I watched the video just now, and what's obvious to me is that the audience actually laughs at the a**hole who shouts out "terrorist." Yeah, McCain does a little double-take, but then that half-smile breaks across his face. He too thought it was funny?

I'm so angry about this that my head feels like it's going to explode. And to think I really did intend to vote for him had Hillary won the nomination.

October 7, 2008 4:03 PM

awrobi01 said:

I get the distinct feeling that due to the acquiescence of the McCain campaign to these outbursts and their obvious desire to pull them out of the audience we will have blood in the streets. I can easily envision people from both sides outside the last debate and a huge bloody brouhaha erupting. The Repugnant brown shirts will have their fight.

October 7, 2008 10:34 PM