TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 4:05 PM
July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
05.10.2008
The Liberal Media: Shaming Non Racists Daily!

Jonah Goldberg:

Stephanopolous said that one of the ways the polls may be "undercounting" is that they aren't counting all of the people who won't vote for Obama because he's black. Nonsense. The people who aren't voting for Obama "because he's black" have undoubtedly already told pollsters they're not voting for Obama.

In other words, there will be no 'Bradley Effect' this year. But wait! 

If there's much undercounting because of race, it's overwhelmingly because non-racist people are afraid to tell pollsters they're not voting for the black guy for fear of people like Stephanopolous calling them racist. [Italics His]

Notice how Jonah has left himself some wiggle room in case Obama's vote totals do not in fact measure up to his poll numbers. The great and good American people are not racist; instead, they have been intimidated by the liberal media. Poor Mr. and Mrs. X really, really have no problem with voting for a black man. No problem at all. But they have heard elitist liberals on television talk about racism, and, alas, they have no choice but to lie to a Gallup employee (or a Rasmussen computer) because they do not want to be publicly humiliated for supporting a white candidate like McCain (George Stephanopolous, duh, keeps personal files on every McCain voter; he may start showing their pictures on television). 

Still, this seems weak. Can we have a little more wiggle room, in case a Bradley Effect does appear to have occured?

And, if there are racists who might be costing Obama the election, they're Democrats.

Thank you.

--Isaac Chotiner 

Posted: Sunday, October 05, 2008 9:54 PM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

simon greenwood said:

When Goldberg was doing those webcam debates with TNR he seemed like a reasonable, high-functioning person, yet when he gets close to a keyboard he is apparently overcome by some sort of brain fever that makes him write about all those racist and fascist leftists.  Strange guy.

October 5, 2008 11:26 PM

JEFF FREY said:

Can someone explain to me how Jonah Goldberg somehow became a person that anyone listens to? I have not read anything of his that was anything but crap. This example certainly counts. (1) X is undoubtedly  true. (2) If X is not true, it would be for this reason. (3) In any case, if X is not true, it is the Democrats' fault. Way to reason, Jonah.

October 5, 2008 11:29 PM

icarusr said:

This is eerily similar to Ahmadinejad's pronouncements on freedom of speech and the like.  As Tolstoy said, all Right Wing idiots are the same; each left winger is peculiar in its own way.

October 6, 2008 1:03 AM

7EV3 said:

...just another one of the excuses that will be used if McCain steals the election.

October 6, 2008 2:20 AM

emigdio said:

Well said, Greenwood.

For my part, I'll propose a theorem: the volume of right-wing bloviating on the Bradley Effect is directly proportional to Barack Obama's poll lead.

Discuss.

October 6, 2008 2:20 AM

miceelf said:

Poor Goldberg. I think he broke something.

October 6, 2008 6:15 AM

Wandreycer1 said:

Holy time-to-pull-out-the-nuclear-ni**ger card.  Check out Drudge.  I knew we'd get there eventually.  Here we are.  Time to scare whitey.  

I have to hope they have McCain juiced up on Thorazine somewhere.

October 6, 2008 9:35 AM

icarusr said:

Wandrey: the Uppity Nigger card is going to be played increasingly overtly; we all knew it would come, and based on the discipline and organization of the Obama campaign, I'd say that there is a "Nuclear War" manual in there somewhere, stuffed mostly with Cindy and Track's drug habits, POWPOW's womanizing, the Palin's adulterous affair(s) and various and sundry financial irregularities of the Palin family.  I doubt very much if any of it has to be used - $1 trillion in lost wealth wonderfully concentrates the mind - still, as we know for a fact that McCain has no honour and that his conception of a "clean campaign" is dredging the bottom of a Third World open sewage canal, it will get uglier still.

October 6, 2008 9:52 AM

gflibCDL said:

wait, what about non-sexists sexists who tell the feminist media they'd vote for a woman, only to keep her under the glass ceiling in the poll-booth or something...

October 6, 2008 10:04 AM

Rhubarbs said:

"Can someone explain to me how Jonah Goldberg somehow became a person that anyone listens to?"

That's easy. Jonah is the son of longtime Republican dirty-tricks operative Lucianne Goldberg. As far as the interplay of native talent and inherited influence, he's my generation's Bill Kristol, God help us.

October 6, 2008 10:33 AM

fougasseu said:

Zogby's numbers are in: Looks like post-debate, the McCain/Palin numbers are heading down. More Palin!!

zogby.com/.../ReadNews.dbm

October 6, 2008 10:59 AM

CAM2 said:

How about the anti-Bradly effect:  long-time Democrats who say they won't vote for Obama because they won't vote for a black candidate but who get in the booth, away from their friends, and pull the lever for him anyway.  

More than a few working class whites may not want to vote for Obama, but are repulsed by McCain.  It's a sharp choice for those who want their vote to count

October 6, 2008 11:03 AM

Political Animal said:

MONDAY'S MINI-REPORT.... Today's edition of quick hits: * It was another very painful day on Wall Street, with the Dow, at one point, dropping 800 points. It ended up closing down nearly 370 points, for the first close below 10,000...

October 6, 2008 5:31 PM