TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
28.08.2008
Media to McCain: "Do I Know You?"

Once upon a time, John McCain flattered political reporters for "intellectually stimulating" him--and political reporters returned the compliment by writing largely flattering things about McCain. But now the first half of that equation appears to be, uh, inoperative. Check out this snippet of an interview Time did with a, as the magazine describes him, "prickly" McCain:

There's a theme that recurs in your books and your speeches, both about putting country first but also about honor. I wonder if you could define honor for us?
Read it in my books.

I've read your books.
No, I'm not going to define it.

But honor in politics?
I defined it in five books. Read my books.

[Your] campaign today is more disciplined, more traditional, more aggressive. From your point of view, why the change?
I will do as much as we possibly can do to provide as much access to the press as possible.

But beyond the press, sir, just in terms of ...
I think we're running a fine campaign, and this is where we are.

Do you miss the old way of doing it?
I don't know what you're talking about.

Really? Come on, Senator.
I'll provide as much access as possible ...

In 2000, after the primaries, you went back to South Carolina to talk about what you felt was a mistake you had made on the Confederate flag. Is there anything so far about this campaign that you wish you could take back or you might revisit when it's over?
[Does not answer.]

Do I know you? [Says with a laugh.]
[Long pause.] I'm very happy with the way our campaign has been conducted, and I am very pleased and humbled to have the nomination of the Republican Party.

You do acknowledge there was a change in the campaign, in the way you had run the campaign?
[Shakes his head.]

You don't acknowledge that? O.K., when your aides came to you and you decided, having been attacked by Barack Obama, to run some of those ads, was there a debate?
The campaign responded as planned.

I think my favorite part of that interview is the Time reporter's beseeching question, "Do I know you?" We've already seen, in John Kerry's case, what can happen when McCain disappoints an old friend. Are we about to see the same thing with the media?

--Jason Zengerle

Posted: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:47 AM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

drdannyu said:

So, um... you and Chait don't share an office, do you?

August 28, 2008 11:04 AM

Robert Powell said:

Read the whole interview. McCain wins, Big Media/Time reminds us of NYT's aiding and abetting the enemy, Dan Rather's flaking forgeries, and the disgraceful Quisling period in Iraq reporting.

"Help" like this Obama doesn't need. When he's seen as supported by traitors, it's the same mistake we make by writing a big check for Iranian dissidents, thereby targeting them for arrest. Thanks, but no thanks.

August 28, 2008 11:18 AM

ndmackenzie said:

Jason Zengerle writes:

-- political reporters returned the compliment by writing largely flattering things about McCain.

Jonathan Chait writes:

-- I'm no psychiatrist, but I kind of get the sense from this interview that John McCain feels a little bit guilty about the kind of campaign he's running

Hmmm.

August 28, 2008 11:55 AM

ironyroad said:

I have to disagree with Robert's interpretation.  Reading the whole interview, my impression is that he almost doesn't want to win.  At least as the words on the page indicate, McCain seems emotionally closed down, unable to connect.  Moreover, one can't help but note that he resists all attempts to discuss more personal matters and declares his family out-of-bounds, while at the same time his supporters are spreading lies about the Obamas around the internet.

August 28, 2008 1:17 PM

icarusr said:

"he resists all attempts to discuss more personal matters"

You mean, Irony, aside from having spent 5-1/2 years as a POW, which is his personal answer to 1) health care, 2) not knowing how many houses he's got, 3) ) his taste in music (literally), 4) the colour of his tie, etc.?

August 28, 2008 2:15 PM

miceelf said:

What the hell is Robert Powell talking about? Does anyone know?

August 28, 2008 7:45 PM