TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
27.08.2008
Let Hillary Be Hillary

The TV commentators I saw last night loved the Hillary speech. Thus far, the print pundits I've read have been considerably harsher, obsessing about Hillary's lack of visible enthusiasm and passion for Obama personally. I tend to be more generous. I mean, it's not as though Hill is widely known for her passionate, warm, and inspirational oratory in the jolliest of times. The gal has trouble connecting, whether talking about Barack Obama or universal health care. It's a central shortcoming of her as a public figure.

All told, I thought it was a damn good speech delivered in an atmosphere so pressurized it would make most people's ears bleed. Hillary knew every word, gesture, smile, sigh, and facial tic would be torn apart by the press and public. She nonetheless delivered arguably the best speech I've seen her give. What's the point now in sitting around opining about whether deep down she really really thinks she should have been the nominee and is still resentful of Obama. Honestly. What normal person in her situation wouldn't harbor such thoughts? 

But I digress. Watching last night's performance made me think that, in the coming weeks, the Obama people would be wise to use Hillary as a key attack dog against McCain and the GOP. Obama is the leader of hope and unity and change and promise. He cannot afford to be too angry or too negative. But Hillary...Hillary has always been a polarizer. She is angry. She is a brawler. She is a grudge-holder. She has issues. Most particularly, she knows what it's like to be slapped around by Republicans better than anyone in this country, and, whatever bipartisan strides she has made in her senate years, she still has the taste for Republican blood. You can see it in those bulging blue eyes. 

Better still, playing the attack dog would lessen the need for Hillary to fake enthusiasm for Obama. All her anger and resentment and disappointment of the past 20 months--hell, the last 20 years--could be channeled into gutting McCain like a trout. People expect Hillary to rage against the Republican machine. For years, she has been their whipping girl, just as for years she has stood as a symbol of perseverence and strength for many Democrats--especially women. Instead of having her run around trying to sunnily convince women or working-class whites of what a swell guy her former opponent is, Obama's people should just wind her up, point her in the direction of these constituencies, and let her rip John McCain and his whole lousy party a new one. It would be honest. It would be real. For Obama, it would be useful. For Hillary, it might even be a little cathartic. Everybody wins! Except McCain. Which is the whole point, right?

--Michelle Cottle

 


Posted: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:11 AM with 10 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

scire said:

agree with you completely. And what a terrific idea of using her as attack dog.

August 27, 2008 12:10 PM

stgla said:

There's a lot of commentary out there but this one stands out for me.  A great case for Hillary's role as attack dog.  Problem is, she wouldn't want to do it.  What's in it for her?  Not to be too cynical, but the best outcome for her is for Obama to lose.

August 27, 2008 12:12 PM

tec619 said:

Michelle said: "I tend to be more generous. I mean, it's not as though Hill is widely known for her passionate, warm, and inspirational oratory in the jolliest of times."

I agree with your characterization of Hillary's oratory. However, I'm a bit surprised that most of the critics o er performance hail from the print media. I guess one had to be there.

That said, it is good to know that she received positive reviews. Though it is a bit strange, because I labor under the impression that the members of the media--especially the tv variety--don't like Hillary and Bill.

August 27, 2008 12:30 PM

GSpinks said:

If HIllary is as concerned about the issues as she let on with her speech, this is a no-brainer. She and Obama share the same position on over 90% of the issues facing America; losing the primary in no way detracts from her ability to fight for the causes she claims to champion, and that she lost to someone who supports her causes should make it that much more tolerable. It really boils down to who Hillary really is: the person she was at the beginning and end of the primaries, or the person she was attacking Obama. FWIW, I think the attack stuff was a facade based on Republican/Rovian tactics designed to prove a point of contention. If Obama lost to her, it would be a good thing because he would more easily lose to the Republicans. If Obama won, it meant Obama probably has what it takes to beat McCain in the fall.

August 27, 2008 12:40 PM

a_long said:

no, she'll do it, because she's a pro. but the problem is that she'll be back in the senate with him when it's all over. and they do seem like they are, or were, real friends, not like McCain-Lieberman or Graham, but more so than just your run of the mill Senate backslapping comraderie. On the upside, maybe he'll lose a bid for reelection to Napolitano in 2010.

August 27, 2008 12:43 PM

ndmackenzie said:

I thought Hillary Clinton gave a great speech last night - but a speech that was long overdue.

Michelle Cottle writes:

-- For years, she has been their whipping girl, just as for years she has stood as a symbol of perseverence and strength for many Democrats--especially women.

On the other hand, Clinton has shown appalling leadership to those of her supporters who claimed they would vote for McCain. Undoubtedly, some women supported Clinton only because she was a woman and they have a legitimate reason to return to the Republican fold. However, given the policies espoused by Obama and Clinton are far more aligned with each other than they are with those of  McCain it should be unthinkable for any Democratic voter to betray the party by switching to McCain. And last night Clinton told them as much - but she waited far too long to teach them about the realities of the world.

August 27, 2008 1:11 PM

wildboy said:

McCain will be dead or disabled in 2010, win, lose or draw.

August 27, 2008 1:28 PM

ndmackenzie said:

In my earlier post I meant to write "On the other hand, Clinton has shown appalling leadership OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS to those of her supporters who claimed they would vote for McCain."  As I pointed out, I thought she did as good a job last night as could reasonbly be expected.

August 27, 2008 2:36 PM

austinexpat said:

These insights are why my torrid intellectual affair with Michelle Cottle refuses to die, despite her inability to tell the difference between a Chicago Bears cap and a Chicago Cubs cap.  Bravo madam, and I agree in every particular.

August 27, 2008 3:01 PM

dbhuff said:

Woof

August 27, 2008 4:55 PM