TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 4:05 PM
July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
26.08.2008
Manufacturing Contempt

Oh lord, I thought, as I clicked on The Hill story headlined Bill Clinton in Denver again undercuts Obama. But then I read the damning quote and I thought, you call that undercutting?

He said: "Suppose you're a voter, and you've got candidate X and candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything, but you don't think that candidate can deliver on anything at all. Candidate Y you agree with on about half the issues, but he can deliver. Which candidate are you going to vote for?"

I know Bill Clinton sort of invited us to parse his every utterance with his meditation on the meaning of is some ten years ago. And I don't doubt that the Clintons are filled with ill will toward Obama. But I also think that we in the media are all a bit too eager to keep the Clinton soap opera going, despite our protestations that we desperately want it to end.

--Jason Zengerle 

Posted: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:16 PM with 14 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

GSpinks said:

DUH! You're just figuring this out now? Better late than never, I suppose...

August 26, 2008 2:37 PM

chrismealy said:

WTF is he talking about? I don't get it.

August 26, 2008 2:54 PM

ramboorider said:

Sounds like undercutting to me. He's calling Obama candidate X, right? The guy he agrees with on everything but doesn't think can deliver. How is this anything OTHER than undercutting?

August 26, 2008 3:26 PM

fougasseu said:

No need to wring your hands over Bill's disenchantment with Obama. America is fed up with Bill Clinton. He may be more helpful as the resentful, aging satyr grimacing at Obama from afar, than as an insincere booster. He represents the status quo and Crony Capitalism at its worst. Clinton's hostility is vivid proof that Obama represents real change.  

If Bush growled at McCain, it would help McCain. McCain may say he's not running for Bush's third term, but you wouldn't know that for all of the winks going back and forth between them.

August 26, 2008 3:27 PM

J.J. Gould said:

Jason, come on; this is *obviously* meant to undercut Obama. It's a passive-aggressive swipe, of a piece with Clinton's pseudo-theoretical reflection while in Africa that "you could argue" no one is ready to be president.

August 26, 2008 4:15 PM

williamyard said:

Well, let's see. It's almost Labor Day. Obama picks Biden and loses a point or two in both Gallup and Rasmussen.

Now, it seems to me the Democrats don't have much interest in retaking the White House. They want to be liked, they want people to agree with them, they want the media to tell them they're right, blahblahblah, but they don't want to win. If they wanted to win, they wouldn't give a rat's ass about any of those issues; instead, they'd be reaming John McCain a new butthole, because that's the only way they will retake the White House, because that's the only way anyone ever retakes the White House.

Bill Clinton doesn't care one iota if Barack Obama wins or loses. Neither does Hillary. For that matter, neither do many of the people who support Barack Obama! All they care about is, do you like me? Do you like my guy? They're too hi-tone to get their hands dirty backing McCain into a corner. Might break a nail if they did. Perish the thought.

So, what's the purpose of this exercise? Just playing out the string, I guess.

It's like in baseball. Soon we'll be watching some of the guys from AA and AAA who aren't quite ready to be everyday major leaguers but could use some ABs against real big league pitching. So they'll be some exciting games when Cincinnati will beat Pittsburgh 4-2 or the A's will slip by the Mariners 3-2 and everyone will have a hot dog and a beer and it will be a nice sunny day at the yard to watch a bunch of minor leaguers give the veteran losers another day off.

August 26, 2008 4:26 PM

GSpinks said:

I don't think that is undercutting nearly as much as a backhanded compliment; Clinton has implicitly declared that Candidate X has the right vision of the future, and explicitly declared that this candidate will need some help getting there.

Of course, the answer should be obvious for Clinton; give the guy a hand! If he's got the right idea, why don't you help him put it into play instead of going to half-assed route?

August 26, 2008 4:51 PM

psantillana said:

williamyard, it takes one to know one, and as I am one, I have the credentials here: you need to get some exercise and sleep and do something outside or something. You are reminding me also of my cat when she licked all of the fur off her stomach. Exercise and sleep. Also tasty nutritious food.

August 26, 2008 6:28 PM

williamyard said:

Mmmm...that's good stomach fur...

August 26, 2008 7:29 PM

Illuminismo said:

williamyard, are you subtly invoking Laraine Newman (if memory serves) saying, "mmmm... that's good chinch" from the Saturday Night Live "Chinch Ranch" commercial parody of the 1970s.  (The Chinch Ranch gave investors both skins and meat.)  Given that you seem to be, from your comments, "of a certain age," I thought it might just be possible.  As if the comment, even without such an allusion, weren't funny enough, and as if we ( I ) needed more reasons to idolize you.  To hell with Obama; YOU are The One.

August 26, 2008 8:57 PM

ironyroad said:

say it bro

August 26, 2008 9:34 PM

ChanRobt said:

Jason, you are clearly in denial.

At what other candidate than Obama or what other situation could his "hypothetical" observation possibly have been aimed?

It doesn't take a helluva lot of "parsing" when someone lays out such an on the nose parable. to know what he's getting at.

August 26, 2008 10:29 PM

ChanRobt said:

fougasseu wrote, "...He may be more helpful as the resentful, aging satyr grimacing at Obama from afar, than as an insincere booster. He represents the status quo and Crony Capitalism at its worst. Clinton's hostility is vivid proof that Obama represents real change."

That's subtle thinking, foug, and there may be some validity to it for a segment of the population.

But, I'm afraid there are probably more people in the actively voting electorate who are something like Bill Clinton than there are young hipsters eager to vote for the change they imagine they believe in.  Whatever that is.

August 26, 2008 10:33 PM

ChanRobt said:

BillyYard, astute and droll as always.

Only, I would take the Clintons a little further.  They don't just not care if Obama wins.  They have good reasons to actively make sure he doesn't.

After Hillary has done the requisite niceties tonight, she will do her Lady Macbeth in the background and make damn sure Barry takes the fall.  Why, she's poisoning apples as we speak.

August 26, 2008 10:36 PM