TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
26.08.2008
A Rising Star?

Other than Michelle Obama and Ted Kennedy, the most compelling speaker at the Democratic convention so far has been Lilly Ledbetter.  The victim of discrimination at a Goodyear plant, Ledbettter won her case before a jury before losing it in the Supreme Court.  On paper, she is the best the best personification in years of why the Court matters to ordinary people.

She's even better in person.  With a deep Southern drawl, and with a clearer speech than many politicians, she explained how the Court had "sided with big business" against her.  Simple and powerful.

Ledbetter’s story brings together two issues: an economy that works for everyone and a Supreme Court that does too.  Her message of economic fairness resonates with women—and with everyone.  It's too bad the network TV audience will miss her.
 
--Robert Gordon and James Kvaal

Posted: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 10:05 PM with 4 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

adaglas said:

A surprisingly savvy move by the Dems.  I brought up this very case when trying to remind an Obamoskeptic friend that the importance of the Court extends far beyond RVW.

August 26, 2008 10:47 PM

CRS9TNR said:

Lily Ledbetter may be a great person, but suing for discrimination when you retire is the type of problem with doing business in America.

She worked for 10 years and took an early retirement.  Then she sues the company.  Sorry but as you're walking out the door , that really isn't the time to claim you were screwed.  If the Supreme Court upheld that precedent everybody would sue their employer to see what they could get when they have nothing to lose.

And it took 10 years of legal work to decide this.  Shows how incompetent our courts are.

Kind of a dumb story to publicize, but not as bad as Jennifer Granholm's Dog & Pony show on C-Span.

August 26, 2008 11:03 PM

GSpinks said:

"Sorry but as you're walking out the door , that really isn't the time to claim you were screwed."

Unfortunately, thats also the time she found out; they ruled she had to file within 6 months of the first instance getting stiffed. Sounds like a very pro-business application of the statute of limitations, if you ask me: "Too bad you didn't find out for 12 months that you got screwed by your employer. The statute of limitations says you only had 6 months. Have a nice day."

August 26, 2008 11:24 PM

kerouac9 said:

I would add that the problem with Lily was that the amount of botox she put into her face before speaking prevented her upper lip from moving at all, and made her delivery difficult to follow.  

August 27, 2008 1:01 PM