TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.08.2008
Last-Minute Veep Thoughts on Biden

By now, it's quite possible the vice presidential nomination is a done deal: Barack Obama has already spoken to the nominee, along with the other finalists, and all that remains is for everybody's cell phones to start ringing or vibrating with text messages.*

(I'd love to be in Washington right now: Will they all go off at once? What will it sound like at the Palm--or in one of the Dupont Circle Starbucks?)

Still, I can't help but note how absolutely perfectly John McCain's housing comments would play to Joe Biden's political strenghts. According to the financial disclosure statements, compiled at opensecrets.org, Biden is the least wealthy member of the Senate. And he's famously good at connecting with working-class voters, at least when he's not using somebody else's words. (This seems like a good time to mention that, if Biden is the nominee, I hope somebody at the Obama campaign read his past statements, including his book, very carefully for evidence of exaggerations or similarly borrowed language.)

Of course, McCain's housing statement is just one incident. But it's safe to assume this isn't the last we've heard that McCain is out of touch with the economic anxieties of average Americans. A running mate like Biden could come in handy.

Note: Jack Reed, who also has a working-class background, is similarly well-positioned to make economic elitism an issue, albeit without the same flair for which Biden is known. I mention this only because Obama's statements about an ideal vice presidential candidate, as relayed by Karen Tumulty over at Time's Swampland, sound suspiciously to me like a description of Reed. Over at the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol seems to think the very same thing I do. (Yes, that's a sentence I've never imagined I would put in print.)

*Update: Just to clarify, I'm saying all of this could have happened already. I have literally no idea if it really has. 

--Jonathan Cohn 

Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2008 2:37 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

dylanposer said:

Not only will it come in handy, Jonathan, but the public can rely on Biden to explout the issue with his fiery rhetoric, which can be so striking in so few words, that even editing the entirety of his remarks won't erase the wound he inflicts.  I'd have my tail between my legs at the VP debates if I were the GOP candidate.

August 21, 2008 3:05 PM

kevincollins said:

The good thing is that the VP nominee is supposed to handle most of the criticism launched against the P nominee during the campain, and Biden is just the man to do just that. I'm sure we can all recall Edwards doing a simply pathetic job of that in '04. One thing, though: National Review ran an article yesterday listing all the criticisms Biden made about Obama when he started his own presidential run, and they're pretty damning. If the McCain campaign is smart, this'll be one of the first things out of their starting gate if Biden gets the nod.

August 21, 2008 3:35 PM

mpatrickhendri said:

Yes, and unlike Senator Judgement, Biden realized the Bush Adminstration and Rummy had no plan for Iraq before 2007.

I like Biden and think he's the smartest guy in the Senate, but the Republicans will hammer away at the plagarism issue endlessly. It will be picked up as the new media narrative and be huge negative in the end. I wish Obama would pick Robert Reich, but little dudes never get the nod.

August 21, 2008 3:57 PM

cal80 said:

I thought the same thing as kevincollins when I read that National Review piece yesterday.  It makes Biden radioactive.  Not just his negative comments about Obama's lack of experience, but all the great things he's said about McCain.  He has no choice but to go with a relatively  unknown/plain vanilla/nondescript vp that can fit in with the largely unimaginative campaign he is running.  

August 21, 2008 3:57 PM

ndmackenzie said:

Jeffrey Goldberg quotes today from his 2005 New Yorker article on Biden:

-- "There are some really bright guys and women in my party who underestimate the transformative capability of military power, when coupled with a rational policy that is both preventative and nation-building in nature," he said. He told me about a recent visit to Los Angeles, where he met with a group of wealthy liberals and laid out the following scenario: "Assume you're the President, and I'm your Secretary of Defense or State or C.I.A. director, and I come to you and tell you we know where bin Laden is, he and four hundred of his people, and they're in this portion of Pakistan the Pakistanis won't go into, and they told us not to go in. This is going to cost us five hundred to five thousand lives, of our soldiers, but we can get him. What do you do?" Biden said they had no answer. "The truth is, they put their heads down," he said.

jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/.../biden_more_hawkish_than_bayh.php

The war in Iraq has "cost us five hundred to five thousand lives, of our soldiers" but hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Perhaps the wrong people put their heads down.

It is perhaps telling that in his Atlantic blog Jeffrey Goldberg ommitted the first sentence of the paragraph he quoted which states: "Biden says that a "small faction" of the Party is mistrustful of even the occasional use of force."

August 21, 2008 4:31 PM

GoodLiberal said:

Why is he the first Biden to be running for Veep in 120 years?

August 22, 2008 10:47 AM