TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM
July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
14.08.2008
McCain: "The Eddie Haskell of Politics"

Reporter and longtime John McCain coverer Amy Silverman of Arizona's New Times has an astounding long feature detailing the senator's history in Arizona politics. Silverman has compiled a treasure trove of data on McCain's political biography--all of public record, but long buried in Arizona, it seems--including episodes in which she was an actor. She details the circumstances of some of the most unsavory political moments of McCain's public life, including the Keating Five scandal, barbs and brawls that reek of misogyny, and his steady courtship of the press. It's a must-read; some of the details are really cutting:

"During lunch, McCain said, almost with mischievous glee, that he had slipped some highly technical questions to [James McClure] to ask Mofford — questions she wouldn't be prepared to answer or expected to answer.

"Flabbergasted, I asked McCain why would he want to sabotage Mofford's testimony, when in fact the CAP was the nonpartisan pet of Republicans and Democrats — such as far-left Udall and far-right Goldwater — since its inception.

"His reply, as near as I remember, was, 'I'll embarrass a Democrat any time I get the chance.'

Callowness and opportunism seem to shade other of his behaviors, particularly regarding the legacies of the two most famous legislators from Arizona. Most interesting to me--if not surprising--is the disconnect between his hard-fought filiation with Morris Udall (and to a lesser extent, Barry Goldwater) and his actions, particularly when it comes to environmental policy:

McCain tends to support big-picture issues that will play well with voters, but when it has come to protecting Arizona over the past 26 years — well, not so much.

In the 1980s, McCain made a name for himself, supporting the limitation of air flights over the Grand Canyon, but in recent years, backed off the effort when environmentalists wanted to expand the limits from small tour planes to commercial aviation. And he's taken a lot of heat recently for refusing to weigh in on efforts to mine uranium near the Grand Canyon.

In fact, despite a vague statement issued last week saying he might, at some point, support mining reform, McCain has failed for years to back proposed changes to the horribly outdated Mining Act of 1872 — and evidence of that is strewn all over Arizona in the form of large strip mines and environmental degradation.

When it comes to Arizona environmental issues, though, McCain's best known for an infamous U.S. Governmental Accountability Office report that details threats he made to the job of a forest service official who dared to disagree with him on the topic of the endangered Mount Graham red squirrel.

Anger, inattention, and a preening instinct--check! Nevertheless, Silverman writes,

 the Udall comparison has stuck, mostly because McCain makes it whenever he can. Even Newsweek, in an April cover story, noted the phenomenon, writing of McCain:

"He traces his environmental awareness to the sainted Rep. Mo Udall, an Arizona Democrat who took McCain as a young congressman under his tutelage . . . To environmentalists, that's like saying you learned about civil rights by driving around Alabama with Martin Luther King Jr."

Which, of course, McCain most certainly did not do. Ultimately, the whole story--which also covers Cindy McCain's drug addiction and more scenes of press bias--conveys nothing more than one inside take on hardball political life. But the final chapter of the Udall saga is very sad:

[McCain] does deserve credit for the time he spent with Udall during his final years. "There was no steadier visitor," Bob Neuman recalls of McCain's visits to his old boss' bedside during Udall's very long struggle with Parkinson's disease. And for that, Neuman says, McCain earned his "respect and admiration and affection."

Until McCain went public with it.

In 1997, Michael Lewis profiled McCain for the New York Times Magazine. Lewis' piece was well-written, and he did get great access to McCain. In fact, the senator even took the journalist to the veterans hospital in Washington, D.C., for one of his visits with Udall. According to Lewis, McCain tried in vain to wake Udall that day. (Udall died the following year.)

About the encounter, Neuman says, "That was devastating to me, that he brought in a reporter. I thought that was crossing the line, and it destroyed me."

Woof. Silverman also links to several (brilliantly titled) articles she has penned since the 1980s, which are themselves worth a read. And in them, I daresay I can't see many instances in which McCain puts "country first." Leading Neuman to call McCain "the Eddie Haskell of politics." Silverman concurs, writing of the senator's still-pristine image, "something seems to be getting lost in translation." Indeed. Obama's skinny resume cuts both ways, I guess--and I doubt this mixed legacy is enough to put Arizona in play--but if even half the tales offered by Silverman's lengthy rundown are true, it's remarkable what relative success McCain is having running a bruising characterological campaign against him.

UPDATE: Headline hyping tomorrow's candidate appearances at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church: Warren "Plans to bring up Obama, McCain's Personal Life." I'll believe it when I see it.

--Dayo Olopade

Posted: Thursday, August 14, 2008 4:32 PM with 11 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

jemerk said:

All it will get is ignored by the national press - they have already issued their studied opinion and they do NOT flip-flop.

August 14, 2008 4:54 PM

tomeg said:

Finally! I was wondering when McCain's cesspool would be dug up, only to discover that it's a burial ground  as well. Kudos to Dayo (and to Silverman, of course).

I admit I have a exaggerated and irrational attitude toward the states, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, and Idaho. Each has its creepy politics, to say nothing of "spiritual" cults and pseudo-religions

August 14, 2008 5:12 PM

cal80 said:

The reason this won't be taken seriously is because the source, New Times, is notoriously liberal.  They make Huff Po look downright conservative.

August 14, 2008 5:18 PM

blackton said:

jemark is right. McCain is coasting on his rep. and Nobama. That is it.

August 14, 2008 5:32 PM

kerouac9 said:

Amy Silverman has done incredible work for a newspaper that is in constant decline.  Contrary to what cal says, The Phoenix New Times is perhaps the finest newspaper in the state, and has reported viciously against Dem. Governor Janet Napolitano (who is in all likelihood a lesbian) as much as it has aimed at the other party.  

It's criminal what the press has failed to report--I with the Left would put together a 527 who can slander McCain, but apparently winning remains a secondary priority.  

August 14, 2008 7:08 PM

teplukhin2you said:

"has reported viciously against Dem. Governor Janet Napolitano (who is in all likelihood a lesbian)"

Is that a crime in Arizona? This is the output of "the finest newspaper in the State"?

August 14, 2008 7:30 PM

GSpinks said:

"Is that a crime in Arizona?"

Tep, this was obviously a response to the allegation of New Times being "notoriously liberal". If I didn't know better, I'd think you were having a tiff because someone dared tell the truth about the sins of Saint McCain. This is no reason to be petulant and snarky. Personally, this just reinforces what I've come to think of McCain over the last 8 months; it almost makes me sick to think that I ever wanted to vote for him.

August 14, 2008 11:00 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Ain't no saint. But he'd stand up to Putin. I'm pretty sure I know who Putin would prefer in the WH. After Bush, of course.

August 15, 2008 12:07 AM

cal80 said:

"The finest newspaper?!?"  Go look at the Phoenix New Times website for this week's headlines:  "The Pig Drinks with Vampie Zombies" and "Not Your Mom's Scrapbook," an Amy Silverman story about a woman who scrapbooks nude photos of her kids and displays them in an art gallery.  Let's just say this is not a mainstream newspaper and leave it at that.  They have done some great investigative work over the years, exposing  local politicians like sheriff Joe Arpaio and county attorney Andrew Thomas, but their working falls into the category of crusading and over-the-top reporting at times.   That is why they remain a once-a-week, free , tabloid-style newspaper that you pick up on college campuses (because they have the best personals section and porn reviews).

August 15, 2008 11:42 AM

psantillana said:

I am familiar with the work of New Times, as they have these kinds of papers all over the country, and in St. Louis, my hometown, it's "The Riverfront Times", where a few of my friends worked. When New Times bought it, the quality took an immediate nosedive. But even still, it wasn't and isn't all bad. New Times likes to hire young people they can boss around and pay little, and they like to run stories that are sensationalistic and empty, but for whatever reason, like weeds through concrete, there will be a very good piece here and there, because the New Times Overlords are not completely omniscient and can be got around from time to time.

Nutshell: New TImes is awful, but the papers are not uniformly and reliably so. Sorry.

August 15, 2008 12:35 PM

The Plank said:

Confession: When it comes to highly exposed women columnists (if it must come to that), I prefer the

August 15, 2008 4:16 PM