TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
07.08.2008
Veep Veep: Hey, What About This Guy?

By all accounts, Barack Obama is quite far along in his deliberations over a running mate. If he hasn't already made his choice, it's down to a tiny handfull of people. The time for suggesting new names, in other words, has long since passed. But with Michigan and its pivotal role in the election on my mind, I can't help but throw out another possibility, one so seemingly ideal I'm surprised we haven't heard more about him already: Senator Carl Levin.

What woud Levin bring to the ticket? First, and most important, he's qualified both to help the president govern and, in an emergency, to become commander-in-chief himself. A graduate of Swarthmore and Harvard Law School, Levin has a resume in public life that dates back to the 1960s, when he was state attorney general. He became a U.S. Senator in 1978 and since that time has built a reputation as one of its most effective members.

Levin has consistently championed the cause of good government, pushing to close tax loopholes and expose corrupt contracting practices. (Among the measures credited to him are the Whistleblower Protection Act.) He's also become one of the Senate's most knowledgeabe, and trusted, voices on military and national security affairs. As chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he commands respect from both the military brass and his Republican senate colleagues. He's demonstrated consistently sharp judgment, too: Like Obama, he was against the war from the start. And he justified that opposition by warning, correctly, that the evidence of Iraq's threat was far too thin.

The potential drawbacks to Levin are all political, starting with the fact that he's been around Washington for a long time. But his credentials as a reformer are pretty impeccable; that might help blunt the Washington charge. In appearance and manner, Levin conveys the image of a rumpled, wise, but friendly old man--which is rather different than the blow-dried, vapid, mechanical impression more stereotypical politicians--including, ahem, this guy--tend to make.

Wouldn't a black-Jewish ticket be politically deadly? I'm not so sure. If anything, a Jewish running mate could actually help Obama's candidacy both in suburban Detroit (where Levin is insanely popular) and South Florida, the communities that may well hold the key to their respective states. Meanwhile, Levin has always shown a strong ability to won over blue-collar voters, as any successful Michigan politician must. (It probably goes without saying, but he's also a favorite of the unions.)

One final thing: Levin, who appears regularly the Sunday shows, is also a terrific surrogate. He goes after opponents aggressively--and, based on what I've seen, cleverly. If his grandfatherly way means he's not always the most electric speaker, it also lets him deliver his attacks without seeming nasty.

I know, I know--it's way too late for this sort of thing. If we haven't heard about Levin by now, we're not going to see him on the ticket. But surely Obama will want to be pondering something while he's taking that vacation next week. Why not this?

--Jonathan Cohn 

Posted: Thursday, August 07, 2008 2:06 PM with 20 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

dylanposer said:

Agreed.  Supremo choice.

August 7, 2008 2:58 PM

raylward said:

What's in his head would make Levin a great VP.  But what's not on his head would make him a bad condidate for VP.

August 7, 2008 2:59 PM

BHLnyc said:

"The Daily Show" once indelibly likened Levin to a kindly old watchmaker. I very much doubt that that's the image of 21st century readiness to lead that the Democrats want to push. Bad choice.

August 7, 2008 3:39 PM

psantillana said:

Didn't Levin get all denouncy and huffy about Obama "disenfranchising" his state during the primary? My very considerable respect for him went down the drain right there, so someone correct me if I'm wrong.

August 7, 2008 3:39 PM

guptatomic1 said:

Blunts the easiest line of McCain parody/attack:  he ooooold, son.

August 7, 2008 4:02 PM

EricWitte said:

Yeah, but that comb-over is probably disqualifying.  It's one of the worst in the Senate, and that's saying something.

August 7, 2008 4:43 PM

kgrant1054 said:

Levin isn't dead?!?  Sorry, thought that he had been pushing up the daisies for quite some time.

Oh, I know he isn't dead but, honestly, Carl Levin?

If you want to put a great candidate on the ticket who happens to be Jewish, I would go to Russ Feingold first.  

Tell me there is another Democrat out there who is as staunch a defender of the Constitution as our man Russ.  That, and his political ads are just wonderful (especially for his first senate run).  He is good on the stump, performs well on the chat shows, and has more sense of the common Wisconsinite than any ten WI politicians combined, which would translate into a very deft touch with folks all around this great land.  Finally, he won't need to desperately hope that people won't realize that he has been far too chummy with Detroit for his entire political career (which may not be a real big 'plus' at this stage of the game).

August 7, 2008 5:28 PM

jon shaw said:

I think Bob Graham would be even better than Levin: former Florida governor and senator and the ONLY member of the Senate to vote for Gulf War I and against Gulf War II. Not to mention that he was chairman of the Intelligence Committee. Take Florida and you don't need Michigan.

Let me repeat that most important point: only one Senator (out of the more than 60 that voted on both wars) had the keen foresight to support Gulf War I and oppose Gulf War II -- Bob Graham. The only other prominent politician that I can think of who took those same positions is Al Gore but he wasn't in the Senate in 2002 for that vote.  

August 7, 2008 5:45 PM

LDuncan said:

Jonathan deserves a bit of love here.  I actually really like Levin.  He's the opposite of flashy or of a 'celebrity."  And, on the Michigan vote issue, he presented the case for a relatively pro-Obama compromise beautifully.  He was the only really impressive speaker on that awful day before the Rules Committee.  

I suggested Levin a few weeks ago on another blog, and several people said that he had a very poor environmental record due to his alliance with the auto industry.  I have no idea whether that is a fair criticism of Levin.  

August 7, 2008 7:43 PM

teplukhin2you said:

I've always thought he looked like that guy on the dollar bill (sans dentures). Especially now that his hair's white.

August 7, 2008 7:47 PM

Gavriel Meir-Levi said:

It's not a bad idea... it's just not exciting.  Of course getting excited about VP picks these days is getting harder and harder (Eric Cantor... YAWN).

I sure wish Al Gore would go for it.  He'd be great.  I know, he doesn't want it.  But maybe if we beg?  Waddya say Al?  If you be my bodyguard...

August 8, 2008 2:17 AM

kindlight said:

jon shaw has a great point. Bob Graham. Outstanding resume, reassuring demeanor. A swing state asset. Case closed.

August 8, 2008 9:36 AM

icarusr said:

This is the same 74 year-old Levin who has been in the Senate for 30 years?

Bob Graham sounds good - what are his social policy creds?

August 8, 2008 11:18 AM

butchie b said:

The reason Bob Graham was not on the ticket in the past is because he has this obsession about keeping a journal that reflects what he wears, what he eats, etc., every single day of his life for decades.

This strikes many people as weird.  And Graham is nearly 70, I think.

August 8, 2008 11:29 AM

purcellneil said:

I like Levin for the job.  I admire Graham for his effort to stop the war before it started, but he doesn't impress me much beyond that one asset.

August 8, 2008 12:20 PM

tomeg said:

How is he as a campaigner? Whomever Obama chooses, s(he) must be a rabid attack dog when loosed on McCain and the Repubs (they *do* travel together, McCain's few (and not very consistent or serious, though much publicized) divergences. Otherwise, no sale. Separated from his phony media persona, McCain is as stale as a week-old saltine.

August 8, 2008 3:25 PM

tomeg said:

Off-topic somewhat, Obama has few effective tactical options to take against McCain, and pretending to be Mr. Clean isn't one of them, no matter how much Obama would like to stroke his self-image. His choice should *definitely not* be any Democratic Senator, and that includes Biden, sorry to say but there it is.

The tried and true method to derail McCain's straight -talk express is to push it into a ravine, negative, dirty, humiliating. Start with his long-steeped involvement with the notorious corruption machine of Arizona political and "business" interests. And expose his media-slap-happy maverick schtick, compared to low-level and low-quality works of righteousness and virtue. In other words push him where *his* rubber meets the road and watch him skid get "testy."

Obama could continue to take the "high road" of criticizing McCain's commitment, or lack of, and flip-flops while MoveOn goes for the gutter.

Seriously, it works, and if done right, works beautifully. Nixon had this down to an art form, but he couldn't avoid using a rusty dull knife.

I'm playing devil's advocate again, but sometimes you have to go with your dark side if only to redress an overbalance of good.

August 8, 2008 3:56 PM

teplukhin2you said:

tomeg - you remind me of that New Yorker cartoon character, the generic commuter type leaving his 5:15 train and thinking [thought bubbles] "My heart's in the highlands, My mind's in the gutter..."

August 8, 2008 5:24 PM

The Plank said:

Barack Obama could surely do worse than to tap Evan Bayh as his running mate. He is an honorable and

August 13, 2008 3:39 PM

The Plank said:

No, I don't have any new information. As far as I know, Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed may never

August 16, 2008 7:38 PM