TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
07.08.2008
Politics: Still a Man's Game

Because I don't have anything better to do with my day than waste my time on stupid Internet gimmicks, this morning I clicked over to "Mike on Ads" to see whether my web surfing reflects my gender. If you haven't heard or read about this little toy yet, it basically looks at your browser history to see what sites you've visited. Then, using data on which genders are more likely to use each site, it guesses whether you are male or female and assigns a probability to it. Ezra Klein and Jeff Goldberg both tested out at 97 percent male. (In other words, the likelihood that the two of them were men was 97 percent.) Andrew Sullivan tested out at 92 percent, which is where I came out, too.

But, like Ezra, I'm more fascinated by the underlying data about who uses which website. The site that gave me the lowest male/highest female score was nwa.com, which is the reservations site for Northwest Airlines. (I live near Detroit, a Northwest hub, so that's usually the site where I make travel plans.) Are women more likely to make their own travel reservations online? Does this simply reflect the heavy usage by administrative workers in offices, the majority of whom, I bet, are also women?

My highest male score came on RealClearPolitics, whose ratio of male to female users is 1.82. Close behind that was Politico, with a ratio of 1.7. And that doesn't seem so surprising until you realize that both figures are significantly higher than the ratio at mlb.com. Mlb.com is the site for Major League Baseball, where I follow the Red Sox. The ratio there is just 1.33.

I'm not saying girls and women can't like baseball, naturally. But it goes to show you just how male-dominated our political conversation remains, even today. (And, no, I don't think that's a terribly good thing.)

--Jonathan Cohn

Posted: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:05 AM with 15 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

michael said:

The gizmo is flawed. My report: Likelihood of you being FEMALE is 1% Likelihood of you being MALE is 99% ------ Well, I did beat (no pun) Andrew and I'd not brag about a coming out where he did (no pun).

So, I still need to recover the missing 1% of my masculinity. Going the mlb site is out of the question for me & I need a quick way to pump up my testosterone. Can't they put a sign on the home page of websites? Like restrooms.

But I can recommend a site with balls: <http://thewho.net>

August 7, 2008 10:52 AM

propositionjoe said:

I only scored 90% male. I feel inadequate. Apparently, visiting Jstor and Amazon diminish one's masculinity. I should have known.

August 7, 2008 10:54 AM

blackton said:

I came out at 50% so for some reason it isn't working for me (or I am really in touch with my feminine side)

August 7, 2008 11:12 AM

anonevent said:

propositionjoe,

I scored 85% male, but it actually seems to be missing a number of political sites - mydd, thinkprogress.  Interestingly, it gives barackobama.com a score of 0.68.

August 7, 2008 11:36 AM

isik1 said:

Thank you for bringing this up. I drew the same conclusion when I scored 98% male yesterday. As a 50 year old woman, it was somewhat of a surprise!

August 7, 2008 12:32 PM

bigfish said:

Another politics post???  TNR is really doing a disservice to its female readership by always talking about politics.  Can't we switch to something more gender-neutral?  Like, apparently, baseball?

August 7, 2008 12:36 PM

emigdio said:

I'm 99% MAN, it seems...sheesh, turns out all those porn sites really jack up your MANness...who knew?

August 7, 2008 1:42 PM

rozenson said:

Bigfish -- Josh Patashnik does his fare share of sports-related posts. That'll even things out.

I scored a 61%, which is strange given that it was based only on five websites, and I know I've been surfing around more than five websites. A couple of the websites listed I barely even used at all. The two female-weighted ones, which were both 0.9s, were very high-traffic sites (Yahoo! and Gmail). Interesting gadget in theory, but flawed in practice.

August 7, 2008 1:45 PM

scire said:

I came out 69% chance of being female, 31% male. Frankly, I was surprised. I am a woman, but I rarely surf what I consider female sites -- mostly politics, bills, job sites. I expected to come out higher on the male side. Guess I'm sexist in thinking the sites I go on are masculine.

August 7, 2008 1:53 PM

jobeek2 said:

Uhhuh. It's just The Politico and RCP that betrayed you as a male. That's all. Or the baseball site, that must have been it. Nothing else in the browser history to give you such a high masculinity score... no, really, nothing to see here, move along.. ;-)

August 7, 2008 1:56 PM

scire said:

emigdio -- you'd think those porn sites my son always sneaks on would drive up my masculinity, but the ones he surfs didn't register.

August 7, 2008 1:56 PM

jet said:

I came out 50% male,  50% fenale.

BUT, I run my browser in secure private mode which is where all you should too.  Shame on you Jon and other TNR readers for running your browsers promiscuously without condoms (aka herpes mode)!

My browser cache and cookies are cleared every time I close my browser.  Sure, it's a (very minor compared to the threat) inconvenience that I have to say, log into TNR each time I visit, but it's well worth that hassle.

August 7, 2008 2:16 PM

jobeek2 said:

Yeah, on a more serious note I got a 64% likelihood of being male ... (which I am) ... but it didnt find many sites to work with.

Some commenters on that site posted lists of several dozen websites the gadget had picked up on, but in my case it found just 10 it recognized.

Except for RealClearPolitics all of them were pretty much average, gender-wise, between 0.87 (Imageshack) and 1.15 (Flickr).

Still interesting though.

August 7, 2008 2:17 PM

jet said:

cache, cookies, browsing history , saved forms and search, download history, and authenticated sessions if you're counting

August 7, 2008 2:20 PM

rozenson said:

Scire -- maybe he's experienced and knows a good cover-up. Then again, if you know of his activities, maybe not.

August 7, 2008 2:24 PM