TNR BLOGS

September 06, 2008 | 3:43 PM
September 05, 2008 | 8:32 PM
September 05, 2008 | 8:16 PM

September 05, 2008 | 2:53 PM
September 05, 2008 | 3:45 AM
September 05, 2008 | 12:25 AM

September 06, 2008 | 3:14 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:10 PM
September 05, 2008 | 4:28 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

September 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
September 03, 2008 | 1:01 PM
September 02, 2008 | 6:20 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
29.07.2008
Obama Vindicated

Yesterday, I posted an item about an accusation from Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv that the Obama campaign had leaked a copy of his Western Wall note to the foreign press (rather than Ma'ariv having bought it from some yeshiva kid who stole it out of the wall). After some additional reporting last night, I noted that the story sounded a bit fishy--not only has Ma'ariv not offered any tangible evidence to support this claim, but they also have only made the claim via a spokesman to various Israeli papers rather than printing the accusation in their own paper.

I just got off the phone with a Ma'ariv spokesman who says that the accusation is "completely false," and that he has no idea who these papers were quoting from Ma'ariv. "No official spokesman for Ma'ariv told this to any of the papers." I've got some calls in to these papers to find out where they got the quote. (I'll update here when I hear back.) He told me definitively that "the Obama campaign did not give us a copy of the letter or approve it for printing."

UPDATE 1: I just spoke with an editor at one of the four publications who quoted the alleged "Ma'ariv spokesman." This editor broached the possibility that Ma'ariv was trying to deflect criticims of it by releasing these spurious rumors about the Obama campaign, but upon realizing that they'll have to back up those accusations, is now disavowing them. This editor is going to look into this alleged "Ma'ariv spokesman" they quoted in his publication so we can try to ascertain if this is a Ma'ariv cover-up. I'll update here when I hear back from him and if I get anything interesting from the other publications who also quoted this alleged spokesman. 

--Zvika Krieger 

Posted: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:25 PM with 15 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

psantillana said:

I think it's safe to remove the question mark, if nobody's even accusing him now.

July 29, 2008 4:37 PM

rozenson said:

Well, thanks for coming clean. However, my fellow commenters already placed my doubts to rest yesterday.

July 29, 2008 4:51 PM

GSpinks said:

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck...

Thanks for the followup, Zvika.

July 29, 2008 4:53 PM

thetraytiger said:

Zvika, may I remind you of your original leap-to-conclusions assertion: "Barack Obama may be above politicizing our troops, but I guess he isn't above politicizing religion."

While I see that the snarkiness was scrubbed from your original post (replaced with the skepticism the story originally deserved), it's good to see you've finally noticed the story's, ahem, fishiness.

Better luck next time.

July 29, 2008 4:59 PM

Robert Powell said:

Obama can be counted upon to survive. Anyway, I add my thanks to Zvika for paying attention.

July 29, 2008 5:26 PM

rriley said:

As a commenter who expressed serious doubt about Zvika Krieger's prior post on WesternWallPrayergate, I freely acknowledge that Krieger is a mensch for this forthright update.  Much appreciated.

But I also have to agree with psantillana that there's no need for the question mark.

July 29, 2008 5:49 PM

colablease said:

Like the others, I appreciate Zvika's efforts to get to the bottom of this allegation.  But I couldn't help but notice that one of the links in the original posting was to israelinsider.com--a site that has been relentlessly, and scurrilously, anti-Obama, playing up the false claim that Obama's Kenyan half-brother had confirmed that he was a Muslim in his youth, and more recently flogging lunatic-fringe claims that Obama had forged his birth certificate.  Is this a credible source?

July 29, 2008 5:50 PM

tomeg said:

As a credulous responder, I'm relieved and a little embarrassed (unlike yesterday when I was greatly embarrassed "and chagrined"). Thanks to all the other posters who helped contain my overreaction! Zvika, it's ok (sort of) but a little more due diligence next time, thanks.

July 29, 2008 6:09 PM

benberger said:

Is this the National Review?  Remove the question mark.  

July 29, 2008 7:19 PM

thetraytiger said:

"He told me **definitively** that 'the Obama campaign did not give us a copy of the letter or approve it for printing.' "

For God's sake, remove the question mark.

July 29, 2008 7:45 PM

psantillana said:

Yay - question mark removed! psantillana et al vindicated! A nod and curtsy to ZK.

July 29, 2008 9:33 PM

WoodyBombay said:

OK, now add an exclamation point!

July 29, 2008 10:34 PM

Soccer Dad said:

via memeorandum I wanted to believe the worst of the Obama campaign. I wanted to believe that they had released the note that the candidate had place in the Kotel (Western Wall) to two newspapers. There was some indication that the paper making the claim

July 30, 2008 8:32 AM

Historian1956 said:

Having missed the original report, but seeing something about this incident elsewhere today, that does mention Obama's prayer note having been stolen, let me state for the record that it is despicible for anyone to STEAL a prayer left in the Kotel.  This would be tantamount to someone standing outside a confessional with a tape recorder attempting to record a penitent's confession.  What is this world coming too?

July 30, 2008 5:20 PM

The Volokh Conspiracy said:

Sen. Obama, in response to the controversy over Israeli newspapers' publication of the note he placed in the Western Wall: Asked what he wrote, O...

August 1, 2008 4:36 PM