TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.07.2008
The Earliest Transition Team Ever*

As Marc Ambinder reported this morning, the Obama campaign is putting together a post-campaign "transition team" to ease Obama from candidate to executive. Several Obama staffers confirmed to Ambinder that the campaign has begun transitional planning, though a formal announcement will not be made until the fall.

University of Chicago public policy professor William Howell, who specializes in presidential history, is shocked by how early Obama has assembled the team. "I can't think of another instance where this has happened," Howell said, and he thinks the difference has to do with our sped-up electoral process:

"For so much of American history, the conventions were real events. It was unfathomable that, when the action was all in the conventions, any candidate would form a transition team before the convention.

But he's smart to prepare. There are general challenges just in terms of learning--who are you going to appoint? What are the first days going to look like? So, it makes really good sense that he's forming this. I think those challenges are compounded by the fact that he's going to be assuming a presidency that's undergone radical changes by the Republican regime. The first days of the Clinton presidency, remember, were rough-going. And, like Clinton, we have a young candidate. Since there are going to be claims that he doesn't have the experience, to the extent that he can appear organized and on top of things, he wants to do that."

There's another way to look at this, of course. By planning his assumption of office before officially receiving the nomination, Obama sets himself up for accusations of presumptuousness and egotism. During his Berlin speech today, at which he was welcomed with seeming rapture, he spoke to the "people of the world" as if he were already president of the United States of America and all she represents. The McCain camp was quick to read some irony into this.

But if Obama does manage to conquer the general election, he'll be that much closer to legislative, administrative, and emotional preparation for the relatively demanding-sounding job: "President of the World."    

*Okay, so it turns out that Obama hasn't assembled the earliest transition team ever. Bush put one together around this time in 2000, and Reagan began making post-election plans in early 1980. Also, according to NBC, McCain is "already working on policy and political proposals so they could hit the ground running." I regret the error. Yet, given the perception that Obama can hold himself in high regard--and fairly or not, as a result of how CW works, he has had to grapple with that perception more than McCain has this campaign--I think the words of E. Pendleton James, director of the Office of Presidential Personnel under Reagan, on building a presidential transition team could've proved helpful in this case: "Do it, but don't let anyone know it."   

UPDATE: We've received a couple calls from the Obama campaign noting that McCain went on TV yesterday and outright said that he has a transition team in place, while Obama has yet to confirm--or deny--Ambinder's initial report. Would McCain have offered that information on television had news of the Obama team's plan not already been aired? It's impossible to say with certainty. But we just wanted to set the chronology straight.

--Nicole Allan

Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:12 PM with 23 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

a_long said:

it'd help if you did some more reporting on the subject before posting, specifically to find out if in fact McCain is also currently laying the groundwork for a transition (it sounds like it) and whether earlier nominees had done anything similiar (yes, Bush-Cheney did the same thing n the summer of 2000, because their executive director of the transition team, Clay Johnson, said it would be "irresponsible not to be doing this."

Both details are in this post today, at Media Matters:

mediamatters.org/.../200807240009

July 24, 2008 8:55 PM

WoodyBombay said:

Oh, come on - now you guys are just making fun of tep.

July 24, 2008 9:00 PM

rozenson said:

WoodyBombay -- my thoughts as soon as I read the post.

July 24, 2008 9:34 PM

mbholman said:

Well in light of the fact that there's evidence everywhere showing that Obama's transition isn't even the earliest of this campaign, let alone ever, this post should be deleted or amended.

July 24, 2008 9:38 PM

mbholman said:

Well in light of the fact that there's evidence everywhere showing that Obama's transition isn't even the earliest of this campaign, let alone ever, this post should be deleted or amended.

July 24, 2008 9:43 PM

blackton said:

"An aide confirms that Podesta will probably be asked to head the transition team, which would take over from the campaign if Obama wins in November, and would be tasked with ensuring a smooth handover of power."

Oh my God, an aide asked Podesta such a question now, how horrifying. I am sorry but the huge freaking IF they mentioned kind of takes away whatever manufactured sting you imagine this has. Election day is only a little more than 3 months away, getting the guy who will handle it committed now isn't such a bad move.

Earliest transition team ever? One aide making a phone call. Woody is right, this is parody, right?

July 24, 2008 9:51 PM

n4blake said:

Facts just get in the way of contrarian snarkiness, I guess.  Bush started in the spring of 1999.  transition2008.wordpress.com/.../transition-2000-george-w-bush and www.jstor.org/.../1554756

In fact, as Bush's guy (Clay Johnson) said, "it's irresponsible not to be doing this" at this point of the campaign cycle.  So what's McCain doing?

And the "citizen of the world" language is not exactly novel either.  (See, e.g., Kennedy and Reagan.)

July 24, 2008 10:11 PM

s4200 said:

I am proud to reject him.

He and his handlers want to put a puppet tyrant into the oval office, and practice an unlimited corruption from day 1.

Can you not see it?

July 24, 2008 10:15 PM

williamyard said:

If he'll spring for snacks, I'll promise to take teppy to the Obama Monument on the Mall (they're tearing down that tall sandy-colored obelisk thingee to make room for it, according to the campaign).

July 24, 2008 10:22 PM

hewstino said:

You are a very brave man for rejecting Obama, s4200.  Years from now, when the Obama Tyranny has finally crumbled, people will speak in hushed, reverent tones of  those who tried to warn us.  Men and women like s4200 and  the gang at Hillaryis44 will finally get their due.  But for the time being, you may have to resign yourself to the fact that you'll be treated  as a kook for a while.

July 24, 2008 11:38 PM

hewstino said:

Also, s4200, you say "He and his handlers want to put a puppet tyrant into the oval office", but I'm confused.  If he wants to put a puppet tyrant in office, it's probably not him, because he couldn't want anything since puppets have no will.  Does this mean he wants someone else to come into office?  Is he a stalking horse?  

Or does he intend to put an ACTUAL puppet tyrant in office, like made of felt and with pasted on eyes and  everything?  Could it be a muppet?  Because I'd actually like to live through that fascinating period of American history.  Sam the Eagle would be an awesome tyrant.

July 24, 2008 11:49 PM

icarusr said:

Fucking hubris.

July 25, 2008 1:06 AM

emigdio said:

Business Plan! Billy Yard's Guided Tours of the Mall! It's like a license to print money!

July 25, 2008 2:20 AM

psantillana said:

Yeah, the nerve of that guy planning ahead. He should just go where the wind takes him.

July 25, 2008 4:31 AM

purcellneil said:

I can't imagine why Obama would want to start planning for transition now - it's not like he needs to hit the ground running in January.  After all, we are only engaged in two failed wars and mired in recession - what's his hurry?

July 25, 2008 8:16 AM

drdannyu said:

If you listen carefully, you can hear the sounds of tep having a seizure, waaaaaay in the distance.

July 25, 2008 9:09 AM

drdannyu said:

Oh, and also, this post is factually wrong, and thus pointless.  Cheers!

July 25, 2008 9:09 AM

Rhubarbs said:

On a serious note, this post was journalistic malpractice. It was predicated on an assertion of fact that was both false and easily researched. The assertion was itself drawn from an obvious misinterpretation of primary report that was also readily available. This "earliest transition ever" thing is a falsehood based on an obvious misinterpretation of the source material. "Back in my day," I say with the onion tied firmly to my belt, we didn't put up with this kind of crap "reporting" on high-school newspapers, much less a professional newsroom. If someone says Obama is planning his transition earlier than anyone ever, you damn well LOOK IT UP. Until you've done a Nexis search to establish the first reported dates for transition planning for every nominee in the previous five or more election, and made a little chart in your notes with dates and references that you can show your editor, you don't write the assertion.

I mean, really. This is Kirchick-level "reporting" here. If I wanted to read bloggers who just make shit up, or who pass along mad-up-shit without investigation, I'd be reading stuff on Blogspot, or The Weekly Standard. Here, I expect a minimum of actual journalism to go on -- at least to the extent of not repeating easily disproved falsehoods.

July 25, 2008 9:33 AM

drdannyu said:

Nicole, please... spare me.  That post-script is a piss-poor way of trying to justify your post in the face of your easily-avoided error.  Please do not insult our intelligence by pretending there was any merit to your contribution, which was clearly part of TNR's current "Obama Hubris-fest."

July 25, 2008 10:23 AM

blackton said:

"Yet, given the perception that " sorry but screw you, you are a journalist, if you want to write your perceptions somewhere that completely disregard facts, start your own blog. I am paying for this so don't justify your incompetence by saying your incompetence is based on a perception you insist on applying universally.

July 25, 2008 10:36 AM

icarusr said:

Rhubs: it would take work, what you propose.  Sneering is easier.

DrDan and Blackie: yeah - even in my severe hung-over state, the asterisk was too much.  I see a budding Kirchick here.  Where's the stake and the silver bullet?

July 25, 2008 11:31 AM

Nari224 said:

hewstino -

"Could it be a muppet?  Because I'd actually like to live through that fascinating period of American history.  Sam the Eagle would be an awesome tyrant."

That is truly awesome!  Perhaps the cookie monster (now appointed as AG) could come back on the Colbert show and take him away in cuffs?

July 25, 2008 1:43 PM

GSpinks said:

Super Grover for Sec Def, Mr Snuffalupagous as VP, Cookie Monster in charge of the Fed Res, Fozzie for Press Sec. and Oscar the Grouch on the Supreme Court!

July 25, 2008 3:35 PM