TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
23.07.2008
Postcard From Berlin, The Perfect Obama City

As Obama prepares to give his much-anticipated speech in Germany tomorrow, we asked Berlin-based journalist Cameron Abadi, who writes regularly for Die Zeit and the Financial Times Magazine, to give us some perspective from the ground: 

There was a time when to be mayor of Berlin meant to have gained entry to the grand stage of world politics: When John F. Kennedy rode through the streets of Berlin waving at crowds from the back of an open-topped car, Mayor Willy Brandt was riding shotgun; likewise, when Ronald Reagan passed through town the first time, his tour guide would be then-mayor Richard von Weizsaecker. Alas, times have changed: Current mayor Klaus Wowereit hasn't even been guaranteed a meeting with Barack Obama.

The snub is an apt illustration of the fact that the city itself has lost most of its former political luster. As a local newspaper remarked yesterday, Berlin is in some ways an unlikely site for a major transatlantic speech. It is no longer a divided city, the frontline of the Cold War; it is a peaceful, but poor town, the capital of a united and prosperous country. It is a place with many problems--high unemployment, a ballooning budget deficit, a population of third-generation immigrants that has not yet been integrated--for which it doesn't seem in a particular hurry to find answers. People from around the world have long sought an escape in Berlin, but the place has been freed of the existential angst of the Cold War that once granted that gesture poignancy.

Many critics have questioned Obama's choice of the "Victory Column" for the site of his speech, as it was originally built to commemorate German military aggression. But today's Berliners actually associate the column with its post-Wall significance: the gathering point of the "Love Parade," an international techno music extravaganza (see above). The students, artists, freelancers, and expats who will flocking to Obama's speech are the same ones who were attracted to Berlin's cheap rents, thriving art scene, and mid-town water front that has been transformed into hopping beach space. Thus, Berlin is actually quite an appropriate setting for Obama's speech--a town drained of its political drama, in front on a monument largely cleansed of its historical associations. Obama's candidacy aims to inspire a new generation, not dwell on the wounds of the past.

Obama's stop in Berlin will be the perfect high point for his rockstar world tour, which is more about gravitas than political substance. Berliners aren't looking for a sober event, in either sense of the word; they'll come for Obama, but they'll stay for the beer.

--Cameron Abadi

Posted: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:29 PM with 14 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

teplukhin2you said:

Ground zero for the techno-punk "Love Parade": brilliant. Deaver would be impressed.

Anyway, if Obama's giving a speech in Europe's version of the East Village, why not go all the way and have an Obamapalooza in Kreuzberg?

July 23, 2008 2:03 PM

teplukhin2you said:

One not-so-slight problem that Obama's advance people would do well to ponder: what kinds of placards do you think the facial jewelry crowd will be holding upwhen he speaks? They're probably assuming a majority will be pro-Obama and specifically aimed at Bush-- or in their more extravagant moments, against McCain.

But what if most of the placards are aimed at the US itself? Have Obama's people considered the strong possiblity that there will be multiple photos and video feeds showing Obama fans holding aloft Palestinian flags and banners flaying "AmeriKKKa"?

Maybe if our candidate had had a bit more experience of the world-- like, um, maybe actually visiting Berlin once or twice and seeing for himself the actual lay of the land there-- he'd not haven chosen this capital of western anarcho-punk politics for his Euro rave.

July 23, 2008 2:09 PM

adamvaught said:

tep,

Did Obama kick your puppy, or something?

July 23, 2008 2:21 PM

teplukhin2you said:

No, I want my UHC. I find it utterly bizarre, and depressing, that in poll after poll, on issue after issue, our _party_ has an enormous lead vs the GOP and yet our party's _candidate_ is almost dead even with his GOP oppponent.

The obvious conclusion is that the candidate we selected detracts from our natural advantage. IOW we nominated the wrong guy, and could have and should have done much better. nb Rasmussen's polling data support this conclusion. Both Gore and HRC do _far_ better than Obama vs McCain in Rasmussen's hypothetical matchups.

If you can -- objectively, in a reality-based and deliberate, good-faith manner-- demonstrate convincingly that Obama is not undermining our party's natural advantage, please do so. (nb awareness surely doesn't explain this gap-- BHO's been all over the media, and the coverage has been far more flattering to BHO than to McCain).

Me, I think it's obvious that this man, for all his charm, chose to run way before he was ready or qualified. We should be absolutely trouncing the GOP. Instead, the race is going to be a nail-biter.

Anyway, I don't own a puppy. Sorry to criticize the Obamaphiles' puppy (love).

July 23, 2008 2:46 PM

TammyA said:

Here's something to consider for a campaign that seems content and dependent on "perfect" visuals: better to not have the ravers and their same-age peers dominating the cameras on the million plus crowd they predict tomorrow in Germany.  While the size of the crowd may be impressive, it would still lack the US-comparison groups Obama needs to win the presidency.  So, I think it best to shuffle the few old-timers that might show up tomorrow to the front of the pack and solidly around Obama.  This way, grandma and grandpa in the US might stop to think, "well, if people like me in Germany support the guy, maybe I can too."  

Tep, the polls are very troubling.  Peeps think the state polls show better data.  Not really.  Our candidate should not be pulling single digit leads at any point in time.  Here's another thing, if he doesn't pull way ahead from this trip (I said earlier I think he would) and the soon to follow Dem Convention, we are in trouble.  

July 23, 2008 3:26 PM

singlespeed said:

Tep....

Too Berliners these days would be busy doing other 'alternative' lifestyle event parties to wave 'AmeriKKKa sucks!' placards. I suspect the facial piercing crowd will be busy holding post-Obama-speech gatherings like sheize parties and minimizing the chaffing from all the leather and latex they wore.

But if I were there in Berlin, I'd be enjoying a nice cold Weinstephaner Hefe in the Tiergarten biergarten and then stroll over into Mitte instead for some laid back local flair.

July 23, 2008 3:27 PM

ndmackenzie said:

Abadi writes:

-- As a local newspaper remarked yesterday, Berlin is in some ways an unlikely site for a major transatlantic speech. It is no longer a divided city, the frontline of the Cold War; it is a peaceful, but poor town, the capital of a united and prosperous country.

Not really. Berlin is the capital of Germany - by far the largest country, by population, in Western Europe and easily the most important country in the European Union. I suspect much of the anti-EU right in Europe would have been offended had Obama decided to do his set piece in Brussels as the "capital" of Europe. The wingnutty right in the US would have been mortally offended had he given a speech in Paris. London is so yesterday. This leaves Rome and Berlin - which is not much of a choice if you are trying to look like a  serious politician.

July 23, 2008 3:42 PM

tec619 said:

Tep: What is your deal? More expereince in the world? Did Dubya  have any? Or would it matter if Dubya traveled widely? Incurious George strikes me as the kind of guy who lands in Paris and catches a cab to the nearest McDonalds. (Dubya talk: Duh, they speak FRENCH here? This isn't Paris, Texas? I Don't wanna go to the Louvre (Bush pronounciation: louie'Vra). There's just dumb art and culture stuff there. Let's go to Disneyland instead. I hear they letcha drink. Fucking a-a-a.)

Why are you such a hater? Hillary didn't win. So what/ Are yo going to be like the "there isn't any difference between the parties " idiots who voted for Nader?

July 23, 2008 5:46 PM

teplukhin2you said:

tec, for you to call someone a "hater" is like Bill O'Reilly calling someone a bully.

Why are you comparing Obama to W? He's not on the ballot. I didn't vote for Hillary. What is your point?

July 23, 2008 8:03 PM

psantillana said:

As a former East Village dweller, and to the extent that the place has kept its identity at all, I must point out that those people are/were waaaaaaay too cool for Lollapalooza.

Also, I don't think these German hipsters are going to be saying bad things about Amerikkka; People going to this rally will more likely be the sort whose opinion of our country has risen as a result of our nominating Obama as the candidate of a major party. If they hate us, believe me it's not because of him. Unless there are a couple of Naderites in the crowd, in which case I think their numbers will be proportionally tiny.

Anyway, we'll all find out soon enough.

July 24, 2008 1:13 PM

sullydog said:

Tep, you are a treasure on Talk Back, and you know I respect you and all, but I have to concur that your incessant Obama-bashing is getting a bit tiresome. Okay, we get it, you wish somebody else had won the nomination. Okay, we get it, he won't give you uhc (not that any of the other candidates, red or blue, would have either). Okay, we GET it, you prefer your dem candidates old, battle-scarred, thoroughly vetted, kinda boring and...well, not Obama. We get it. Really, we do.

But he did beat Hillary, he did win the nomination, he's not Conan the Barbarian, he won't socialize medicine (much as I, too, wish that he would), he can't compare with McCain on the war hero metric, and he's SUCH a young whippersnapper, and has come SO far on his silver tongue and he's oh, SO clever and political. Check. We got it.

Now, do YOU get that he's our candidate, the progressive candidate, a candidate who excites people, and who appears to thoroughly have his shit together? That, as of right now, he's beating McCain in the Electoral College? That his policies are progressive without being radical, and that an Obama presidency would be far, far preferable to a McCain presidency? Of course you do.

Are you going to vote for McCain? I think not. You are going to vote for Obama. And you are going to do it knowing that he's not the ideal perfect candidate who will make Everything Perfect Forever. Believe it or not, we know that too. Let's move on. Puh-LEASE.

July 24, 2008 1:45 PM

sullydog said:

Oh, and by the way, after watching the speech, I can assure you that the only flags that were being waved around were American and German flags. American flags. In Berlin. Being waved. Enthusiastically. Not burned.

By a crowd of 100,000 + people, who love America again.

The visuals for Obama were stunning.

Decent speech, too. Generic, but decent.

July 24, 2008 2:03 PM

teplukhin2you said:

sully - Obama is first and foremost a BS artist. If he were a progressive, he would be bashing the sama artists on Wall Street who have created our financial mess and who, unbelievably, are now demanding that the public bail them out. He'd also be in favor of means-tested school vouchers for working families with kids trapped in atrocious public schools, and he'd have a serious plan for lowering gas prices, not one that punishes blue-collar people who have no choice but to commute long distances. And of course, if he were truly progressive he'd make his top priority the severing of this insane linkage between employment and health insurance.

Instead, we have nominated the darling of the hedge funders, a timid and slippery man who refuses to even make a peep about his Wall Street pals' scams, whose energy policy does nothing to help working families, who refuses to spend any capital whatsoever on vouchers or UHC, whose helath care plan in fact PRESERVES the link between employment and insurance rather than doing away with it.

And yet he's progressive because... he'll filibuster FISA and get us out of Iraq in short order. Except, of course, he isn't against FISA anymore and is rapidly eliding into W and McCain's position (Friedman nails this in his column this week).

Sully, tell me true, in all good faith: don't you find it a little precious that this man has created his own quasi-presidential seal for his podium?

Or that he and his staff talk about his presidency in the active rather than the conditional tense?

Or that he fumbles his way along when not in front of a teleprompter and is so uncomfortable with tough scrutiny that he's stiffed the press and is now holding fake "interviews" in which journalists are granted only the sublime privilege of listening in on internal campaign con calls?

I know I've exhausted whatever influence I had on these boards, but maybe you'll listen to wiser voices like James Joffe or Jim Grant or Joel Kotkin. In various ways, these experts on foreign policy, finance, and urban development and demographic change, respectively, have pointed out the huge deficiencies in Obama's candidacy, both his style, campaign message and policy priorities. Whatever you want to label this man, he's simply not a progressive in the sense that many millions of ordinary working families in this country would understand the term.

Joffe's piece is in TNR. Marty linked to the Grant piece. Here's Joel Kotkin: www.american.com/.../the-democrats2019-dilemma

July 24, 2008 2:43 PM

sullydog said:

Tep, I'm worried about you. Another volley, same old stuff full of sound and fury...

I'll say it again. We get it. You don't like Obama because he's young and inexperienced. You don't like Obama because he's trying to win. Because he's trying to woo voters in an incredibly tight electorate. Because he's trying not to piss off people who could destroy his chances of election. Because he's not as liberal -- or won't TALK as liberal -- as MoveOn.org would like (which would guarantee four more years of Republican rule). Because in 2008 he recognizes the political reality that if he makes a UHC part of his platform he can't, you know, get elected (which, correct me if I'm wrong, the point of the exercise--you'd rather have McCain's plan?). Because he's moving to the center in the general like...uh, well, like every presidential candidate in modern history.

So, yeah, WE GET IT. You don't like Obama because he's a _politician_.

I don't know how to help you with that one, except to point out that it's evern worse than that. He's a BLACK politician, with the middle name "Hussein" and a surname that rhymes with "Osama." Hard to believe that, as of right now, he's winning. Still, a 47 year-old good-looking black guy with no medals, adored by Europeans, moving to the center, with a terrorist name and a fist-bumping wife...yeah, that's a flawed candidate. I'll give you that. We really do GET IT, Tep.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, he put floofy seal on his podium. Yeah, yeah, yeah, he's willing to play politics on issues from the war to FISA to energy. (For my part, I think his position on energy is defensible, while McCain's is shameless). Yeah, yeah, yeah, he's the biggest slipperiest gladhander since Slick Willy.

So what?

As to being timid or fumbly...what are you _smoking?_

You still haven't answered me: are you going to vote for McCain? Because I don't think you will. Your party has chosen its candidate, and we are all exquisitely, completely, painfully aware, Tep, that you wish it had been somebody else. Duly noted. Granted. Acknowledged. Some of us do, too. You might be surprised.

But, you see, the difference between you and some of the rest of us isn't that we don't recognize that Obama is a flawed candidate--like all the other candidates.

The difference is that we're _over_ it.

July 24, 2008 3:32 PM