TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM
July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.07.2008
McCain: Americans Tiring of the Obama Presidency

The McCain campaign's response to Maliki's endorsement of a 16-month withdrawal can be summed up as "La la la la la Ia I can't hear you." Today, McCain foreign policy advisor Randy Scheunemann said "there were some translation problems" with Maliki's statement, even though the New York Times has produced and translated a verbatim transcript of the recorded interview. Scheunemann also asserts, "One inartful statement from from Prime Minister Maliki certainly does not change Iraqi government policy."

But the statement was clear as a bell. Also, as Chris points out, Maliki's spokesman has subsequently endorsed a 2010 withdrawal. I really wonder how much longer McCain can keep this up. (I'm imaging Scheunemann in mid-August: "A half-dozen inartful statements by Iraq's Prime Minister, a few signed letters plus a white paper and a legislative resolution do not change the fact...")

As long as I'm critiquing McCain's message of the day, I'll note that his new ad begins, "Who can you thank for rising prices at the pump? Obama, Obama." Are they really trying to convince voters that Obama, who has not yet been elected president and may never be, is responsible for rising fuel prices?

Putting these things together, it seems that McCain is trying to persuade Americans that the junior Senator from Illinois currently has total control over American energy policy, while the Prime Minister of Iraq has no influence whatsoever over Iraqi foreign policy.

--Jonathan Chait

Posted: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:22 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

tnmats said:

Wow, I never realized Obama was such an effective senator while being useless at the same time.  Glad McLiar pointed that out to me.

July 21, 2008 1:29 PM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

Of course I agree with Slugger that this new McCain effort is lame. What I sense, from the great story on that Salter dude and from other McCain comments is an "inartful" sense of resentment and near inferiority on the part of the Old Man. It is really clear to me at least that Obama gets under McCain's thin skin. I know that the nat'l polls currently have it close but once the campaign season starts (you can tell that I am older because I still define that as after the conventions) the gap will grow and what we will see and hear from McCain will be very painful to witness: An old bull trying to hold off the young bull. Classic case but still, played upon a national electioin canvas, very painful to see...

July 21, 2008 1:37 PM

blackton said:

Did the spirit of John Kerry's campaign somehow manage to take possession of John McCain's? I thought McCain ran a decent primary but since he won the nomination has gone completely off the rails. The only reason I can see that Obama is not up by 20 points is that too many Amreicans are just racist bastards or completely oblivious to the campaign thus far.

July 21, 2008 1:44 PM

mpatrickhendri said:

Perhaps if McCain had been elected in 2001, he might well have been a smart, effective president. But seven years dragging himself to the right appears to have compromised his ability to think and tell the truth. It's hard to blame him, nearly eight years bringing himself into perfect harmony with the Bush Admnstration has got to cause some form of braindamage.

In any event, his loud call to have Obama admit the tactical success of the "Surge," - conditions on the ground as he says - seems a bit hallow when he is claiming that the precise and repeated words of the Iraqi leadership is simply an "inartful statement." if he can't come to terms with actual conditions in Iraq, them asserting their own right to rule, he has no business being president.

July 21, 2008 2:00 PM

GSpinks said:

blackie, I'd vote strongly for oblivious. The population at large simply refuses to embroil itself in these events as we have done.

This is unfortunately, because it is obvious that the GOP is screaming louder, and more often, which improves their chances at building a positive impression of themselves and a negative impression of Obama basically while no one is looking (rumor, hearsay, gossip, news flashes, etc). Once the fall hits, everyone is going to start out hating Obama, but you would be hard pressed to get anything consistent or coherent out of even the smallest groups.

July 21, 2008 5:42 PM

The Plank said:

My response to the McCain gas prices ad was similar to Jason's --that is, I think the "O-ba

July 22, 2008 10:42 AM