TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 4:05 PM
July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
10.07.2008
This Just In: Six Years of Torture Take Toll on Marriage

Ingrid Betancourt's release from FARC rebels on July 2 marked the end of a six-year nightmare. In addition to the constant feeling of bugs crawling all over her body, the mental torture of being screamed at incessantly, and the near starvation she faced every day, there are still some horrors she can't yet discuss. According to CNN.com, in an interview with Larry King, "Betancourt also would not detail the punishment she endured after a failed escape attempt. 'Oh, that was horrible,' she said before telling King that she was 'not ready for that.'" Nor would she talk about the circumstances of a child born to another hostage in captivity. What Betancourt is doing is shining more of a global light than we've seen in many years on a intolerably sadistic rebel group. Which is why it is galling to see the following headline accompanying a CNN story about Betancourt: "Betancourt's Husband Admits Icy Reunion." Apparently, she wasn't as warm to husband Juan Carlos Lecompte as, well, as what? As a survivor of six years of torture should be? It seems that before leaving for France without him--no!--she "greeted him coldly." Well, I guess he is the real victim here after all. Thanks CNN, for bringing us all angles of the story.

 --Sacha Zimmerman

 

Posted: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:04 PM with 15 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

williamyard said:

I hate that: you've been keepin' the home fires burning, paying the rent, filling the hummingbird feeder, etc., and all of a sudden after six years of doing who knows WHAT (likely including a lot of plain old sitting around, while the rest of us have to go to WORK), da bitch just walks right in, all la-de-da, and not even a goddamned peck on the cheek. I mean, sure, she's been held captive under horrific conditions by sadistic nutjobs but, Cheeses, not even a fucking post card? Too much trouble to find a 27-cent stamp, huh? Well, excuuuuuuse me.

July 10, 2008 2:34 PM

nbarry said:

Right. And John McCain's five years of torture had no effect on his marriage. What kind of a world is CNN living in?

July 10, 2008 2:43 PM

ChanRobt said:

Sacha, get off your feminist rant.  I doubt the implication of this was that her husband had suffered more than she.  Only, that her reaction to him would be counter-intuitive, or at least counter the fairy tale in our heads about what such a reunion would "normally" be like.

Perhaps, if you want to get Freudian, she unconsciously or consciously feels that he failed her in the archetypal male role.  That is, he did not rescue her.

Or, maybe she just didn't like him that much before the kidnapping.

In any event, your reaction to the discussion point is hypersensitive and ridiculous.  It does not seem that this was the entire focus of the interview.

July 10, 2008 2:47 PM

tnr1.com said:

ChanRobt: is that what's passing as a "feminist rant" these days? I thought it was just good-natured ribbing. Anyway, you're right: marriage isn't the entire focus of The Larry King interview--or even a focus at all. Berencourt's marriage is, however, the exclusive provence of a CNN storylette that I, ahem, linked to because of the really bad header. Hypersensitively yours, Sacha

July 10, 2008 3:48 PM

ChanRobt said:

Sacha, your satiric intent didn't come through to me. It just sounded like you were annoyed.  No doubt the fault of this reader.  

July 10, 2008 4:17 PM

tnr1.com said:

aw shucks, now I feel bad. -Sacha

July 10, 2008 4:52 PM

blackton said:

Sacha, yeah, it is Channy's fault, no question. I have no idea where the feminist angle came in. I frankly don't want to know the private affairs of their long sought reunion. It is not my business, nor anyone else's.

Channy could be right about the other points, but as I said, I have no desire to intrude on their lives by speculating.

July 10, 2008 6:18 PM

TammyA said:

What is tragic here is CNN's turning the Betancourt ordeal into a tabloid-like story.  Leave it up to CNN to do this.  If I were you Sacha, I wouldn't defend your editorial to Chan.  In addition to trvializing the Betancourt ordeal into a marital-gossip matter, the mini story posted comes across as blaming her for being "cold" to her hubby.  If we were talking about a US male soldier doing this to his wife, the mental health experts would be flooding the airwaves with PTSD stuff.  No wait a minute.... the marital issues of a US male hostage wouldn't even be discussed.   Chan, you have the slightest idea of what feminist rant really is.  

July 10, 2008 6:20 PM

ChanRobt said:

OK, ladies, I'll confess to reading Sacha's piece quickly.  When I miss irony or satiric intent, I'm always annoyed with myself because I'm generally considered by those who know me to be on the droll side.

Inasmuch as my brain was in gear on this one, it seemed that Sacha was complaining that the Larry King interview was "all about him," rather than focusing on Betancourt's six year ordeal.

Obviously, if that had truly been the case, it would have been outrageous.  But, though I did not see the interview, I couldn't imagine that this could possible have been so.  

Inferring that Sacha had taken umbrage where none was justified, I characterized her doing so as a "rant".  Perhaps a bit hyperbolic.  But, not an unheard of transgression on my part.

NOW am I sensitive enough?

July 10, 2008 9:54 PM

TammyA said:

chan.  you're much more than sensitive: you're smart, witty n cool.  good combo.

July 10, 2008 10:51 PM

ChanRobt said:

How sweet of you, TammyA.  Those are much more tender words than usually heard on these mean streets.

Not that I'm ever very nice.

July 11, 2008 3:47 AM

ChanRobt said:

it occurs to me that another notorious kidnapping also ended a romance:  Patty Hearst never returned to her fiancé, who I believe had the unfortunate last name, Weed.

July 11, 2008 3:53 AM

ChanRobt said:

Sacha, the more I think about this, why did you write so flippantly about the unfortunate Juan Carlos.  

Is this not a tragedy for him, as well?  to wait six years for his wife to be freed.  To have, according to the CNN story you linked, worked assidiously all this time to secure her freedom.  And then, to find he has lost her?

Of course her suffering was beyond comprehension.  But, we must assume that his was, too.

It is bizarre how the media-- by which I suppose we mean actual people-- pick favorites in such situations.  One to be mourned, one to be scorned.

July 11, 2008 4:01 AM

blackton said:

channy, who are you calling a ladie?

July 11, 2008 1:19 PM

ChanRobt said:

Did I say lady?  I meant laddie.

rcc

July 11, 2008 6:25 PM